VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Entitled to Freehold Under Leasehold Reform Act - First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided on the purchase prices for four properties under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The decision was made because the landlord could not be found, allowing the tenants to acquire the freehold of their properties.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to acquire the freehold of their property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 when the landlord cannot be found.

Topics

tenancyleasehold reformfreehold acquisition

Provisions

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.27Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the purchase prices for four properties under section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the purchase prices for four properties under section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, where the landlord could not be found. The decision was made by Judge JR Morris on 17th October 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

1

Case Reference

: CAM/00ME/OAF/2019/0006

Properties

: 21 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] 22 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] 23 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] 24 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Applicants (Tenants) : [NAME] (21) [NAME] (22) [NAME] (22) [NAME] (23) [NAME] (24) [NAME] (24) Representatives : [COMPANY]

Respondent (Landlord): The Freehold Owner(s) whose identity is unknown

Date of Claim

: 7th December 2018

Type of Application : To determine a purchase price on enfranchisement where the landlord cannot be found (section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 as amended.

Date of Determination : 17th October 2019

Tribunal

: Judge JR Morris

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

Decision

1. The Tribunal determined that the Premiums payable for each Property are: FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 £1,205.00 for 21 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,405.00 for 22 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,305.00 for 23 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,305.00 for 24 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Reasons

The Application

2. This is an application to the Tribunal under section 21 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (the 1967 Act) to determine the amount to be paid into court pursuant to Section 27(5) of the 1967 Act as amended by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

3. Directions were issued on 8th August 2019 in which it was stated that provided the parties complied with the Directions the application would be determined on the basis of the documents alone and without an oral hearing unless the parties requested an oral hearing within 14 days or the Directions were not complied with or a comprehensive valuation report was not provided.

4. No request for an oral hearing was made and the Tribunal found that the Directions were complied with. The following Decision is therefore based on the documents and information provided in the Bundle submitted in accordance with the Directions.

5. This matter has been transferred to the First-tier Tribunal to determine the price payable in accordance with section 9(1) of the Leasehold reform Act 1967 (“the 1967 Act”) pursuant to a Vesting Order (“the Order”) made by District Judge Henson on 9th July 2019 at the County Court sitting at Reading Aylesbury in case number E02RG103 in respect of the individual freeholds of the following properties (“the Properties”): 21 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] (“House 21”) 22 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] (“House 22”) 23 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] (“House 23”) 24 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] (“House 24”)

The Law

6. The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 as amended by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (“the 1967 Act”) enables tenants of houses on long leases at low rent to enfranchise (acquire the freehold) their properties.

7. Section 27 of the 1967 Act provides for an application to the court where the landlord cannot be found to dispense with notice and require a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal to determine a price under s 9 to be paid into court and terms of transfer to be filed with the court.

8. Section 9 of the 1967 Act provides for one of three methods of valuation to determine the price depending on the rateable value of the property at a specific time (the appropriate day). The relevant method in this case is that set out in s9 (1) which requires the Tribunal to assume that at the end of current term, the tenant

3 has applied for and been granted an extended lease under section 14 of the 1967 Act for a term of 50 years from the date of the existing tenancy at an open market ground rent. The basic principle is that the enfranchisement price should compensate the landlord for the loss of rents (including any current arrears) until the extended term date and the loss of the freehold at that time.

Documents

9. The Order was made following a statement dated 4th December 2018 the salient points of which were included in the Order. These were that the Applicants are the respective registered proprietors of the Properties pursuant to a lease dated 11th December 1608 for a term of 500 years (“the Lease”) having been so registered for more than two years prior to the issue of the claim and so qualified under the legislation to purchase the freehold. It was also stated that the Applicants (Claimants in the County Court) satisfied all the legislative conditions.

10. The registered titles are as follows:  Title Number BK385544 shows [NAME] to have Good Leasehold Title of House 21 from 20th November 2003 (purchased 23rd October 2003).

 Title Number BK57481, BK353622 & BK346222 shows [NAME] and [NAME] to have Good Leasehold Title of House 22 from 31st July 1972.

 Title Number BK376659 shows [NAME] to have Good Leasehold Title of House 23 from 19th September 2007 (purchased 3rd September 2007).

 Title Number BK159543 shows [NAME] and [NAME] to have Good Leasehold Title of House 24 from 15th May 1978.

11. All the Leasehold Titles are derived from the Lease, the known details of which are recorded on the entries at the Land registry as: Date: 11th December 1608 Term: 500 years from 11th December 1608 Rent: £0.0s.4d if demanded Parties: (1) [NAME]

(2) [NAME] The registered titles of each property included land which was not subject to the Lease.

12. The Order designated [NAME] Partner at [COMPANY] to execute the related conveyances, HM Land Registry Forms Transfer of part of registered title TP1.

13. The amount of ground rent outstanding and owed to the Landlord was calculated as being £13.80.

14. The supporting documents were provided in the Bundle.

4 Description of Properties

15. The Applicant’s Surveyor was [NAME] BA(Hons) MRICS who provided a written Report as an Expert and made the necessary Declaration to act as such.

16. The Report included a description of the Properties the main points of which are:

Situation

17. Houses 21, 22, 23 and 24, collectively known as [COMPANY], are n a semi- rural position in the village of [NAME] about 4 miles from Thatcham and a little over 2 miles from Newbury.

Description

18. The Houses are a terrace of four, two storey cottages and appear to be constructed of brick or stone behind rendered elevations with timber floors and under a pitched clay peg tile roof. Photographs were provided of all the Houses and each House was described as follows:

19. House 21

The property is a double fronted end of terrace with gravelled off-street parking in the front and a rectangular rear garden. The cottage has replacement uPVC framed double glazed windows and modern electric heating and hot water system.

Ground floor Hall/Dining area Reception Room Rear Hall Kitchen Bathroom/wc

First floor Small Landing with walk in cupboard Master Bedroom with rear dormer recess serving wc and wash hand basin Second Bedroom

Outside Front courtyard/garden Small/average sized rear garden

Gross internal floor area approximately 72.52 square metres (781 square feet)

Improvements to be disregarded Dormer added increasing usable floor space in master bedroom.

20. House 22

The property is a mid-terrace with paved off-street parking in the front and a large ‘L’ shaped garden to the rear. There is an under-croft passageway to the right-hand

5 side of the ground floor which serves the front door and provides an informal shared access to the rear of House 21. The cottage has replacement uPVC framed double glazed windows and modern electric heating and hot water system.

Ground floor Hall Reception Room Kitchen Area Open Plan Dining Area and Family Room Bathroom/wc

First floor Small Landing Master Bedroom partly above the under-croft passageway Second Bedroom Study leading to [ADDRESS] and Driveway Large ‘L’ [ADDRESS] internal floor area approximately 97.37 square metres (1,048 square feet)

Improvements to be disregarded Significantly extended to the rear providing for open plan dining area and family room on the ground floor and study and third bedroom on the first floor approximately 37.12 square metres (400 square feet).

21. House 23

The property is a double fronted mid-terraced cottage with gravelled off-street parking in the front and a large rear garden with pedestrian access to a shared unmade path. The cottage has replacement uPVC framed double glazed windows and an oil-fired central heating and hot water system.

Ground floor Reception Room Kitchen Bathroom/wc Conservatory

First floor Small Landing [ADDRESS]/[ADDRESS] internal floor area approximately 67.44 square metres (726 square feet)

6

Improvements to be disregarded Conservatory approximately 8.54 square metres (91.92 square feet)

22. House 24

The property is a double fronted end of terrace with gardens to the front and side. The cottage has replacement timber framed secondary glazed windows and an electric heating and hot water system (solar panel on the roof).

Ground floor Entrance Hall Reception Room Dining Room Kitchen with door to Lean-To Inner Hall Cloakroom/wc

First floor Landing Two Bedrooms Study/Third Bedroom Bathroom Separate wc

[ADDRESS] Sized Side garden Single Garage via Small Driveway Small Brick-built Potting /Storage Shed

Gross internal floor area approximately 85.04 square metres (915 square feet) excluding Garage and Outbuilding

Improvements to be disregarded Enlarged and garage added.

23. Development Potential

The Properties are not listed or in a conservation area and so could be extended. However due to their being a terrace on plots which are irregular in size and shape, it was submitted that they had already been developed to their fullest extent.

Calculations

Valuation Date

24. The Valuation date in this instance is the date on which the claim to enfranchise is issued in the County Court for a Vesting Order. This is 4th December 2018.

7 25. Firstly, [NAME] identified the two methods of calculation under the legislation of the Original Valuation Basis and the Special Valuation Basis the main determining tests between the methods being the rateable value and the ground rent.

26. The first day of the term of the Lease being before 1965 then the 1965 rateable value is the relevant value. If it is below £200 then the Original Valuation Basis applies. [NAME] said that he was not able to find the 1965 rating List but [NAME] was able to provide the rateable values for 1973 as: House 21 £67.00 House 22 £194.00 House 23 £100.00 House 24 £100.00

27. On the balance of probabilities, the rateable value for each of the Houses in 1965 was less than £200.0 and the passing ground rent for each of the Houses in 1965 was less than two thirds of the rateable value. Therefore, the Original Valuation Basis applies.

28. [NAME] identified the three statutory components of the Original Valuation Basis for calculating the cost of the enfranchisement as:

1) The capital value of the Ground Rent Interest is calculated to compensate the freeholder for the loss of the future ground rent. This is assessed by applying a capitalisation rate.

2) The capital value of Reversionary Interest is calculated to compensate the freeholder for the loss of the return of the property at the end of the Lease plus a statutory presumption of 50 year lease extension. The value is calculated by using a deferment rate applied to the current freehold value including any development potential (“entirety value”) of the property.

3) The Modern Ground Rent Interest to account for a lease extension of 50 years at the end of the Lease.

Ground Rent Interest (Capitalisation Rate)

29. In his experience a capitalisation rate for a ground rent as under the Lease would be between 6% to 7% and therefore, he submitted a capitalisation rate of 6.5%.

Reversionary Interest (Deferment Rate and Current Freehold Value)

30. Pursuant to Cadogan v Sportelli [2007] 1 EGLR 153Mr [NAME] adopted a deferment rate of 4.75%.

31. As stated, this is applied to the current freehold value. [NAME] said that there was a paucity of recent evidence as to the freehold value of the Houses. [NAME] used the last sales figures for House 23 and House 21, which were the most recent to be sold and taking into account the term unexpired on the Lease and applying the Land Registry Property Price Index for [NAME], sought to determine the value at the date of valuation.

8 32. House 23 sold in September 2007 for £233,500 with 101 years 3 months unexpired on the Lease and applying the Land Registry Property Price Index arrived at a value for December 2018 of around £314,657.

33. House 21 sold in October 2003 for £164,000 with 106 years unexpired on the Lease and applying the Land Registry Property Price Index arrived at a value for December 2018 of around £291,530.

34. To check these figures, he considered the sales of other freehold properties around the valuation date which, so far as possible, were similar to these Houses in [NAME].

35. [NAME] submitted the details of three houses as follows:

36. 32 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME], which was sold in February 2018 for £592,500 and again in July 2019 for £577,500. The property was submitted to be notably superior to the Houses. It was an early Twentieth Century, four-bedroom, semidetached house of about 153 square meters (1,647 square feet), ‘beautifully updated, with 120-foot garden and ample parking.

37. [ADDRESS], [NAME], which was sold in May 2019 for £368,000. The property is a mid-1980s three-bedroom semi-detached house of 154.9 square metres (1,667 square feet) with front and rear gardens and a car port. The property was also submitted to be superior to the Houses and the Land Registry Property Price Index for [NAME] showed a decrease of around 1.4% between December 2018 to May 2019.

38. 63, [ADDRESS], Newbury which was sold in October 2018 for £325,000. The property was built in that last 15 years and is a three-bedroom semi-detached house 81 square metres (876 square feet) with a small front garden and average rear garden. The property was said to be less attractive to some purchasers who would prefer the period features of the Houses but more attractive to the purchaser with a family who would prefer it layout and lower expected maintenance costs. The Land Registry Property Price Index for [NAME] showed a decrease of around 0.7% between October and December 2018.

39. Based upon this evidence [NAME] submitted that the freehold value of the Houses was as follows: House 21 £300,000 House 22 £350,000 House 23 £325,000 House 24 £340,000

40. Applying 4.75% to these figures he calculated the reversionary interest to be: House 21 £452 House 22 £528 House 23 £490 House 24 £513

9 Modern Ground Rent Interest

41. To capitalise the modern ground rent for the 50-year extended lease from 10th December 2108 following must be assessed:  the site value based on the ‘entirety value’  a capitalisation rate.

42. [NAME] submitted that it was appropriate to take a site value of 33.33%. In doing so he referred to a previous decision of the First-tier Tribunal BIR/41UB/OAF//2018/0014 in which a one third apportionment was adopted.

43. [NAME] said that in his experience a dynamic ground rent is often 5.5% and set the capitalisation rate accordingly.

Enfranchisement Price

44. Applying the capitalisation rate, deferment rate and current freehold value he had assessed, [NAME] provided calculations for each of the properties using the Original Valuation method and assuming that there was some form of negotiation with the freeholder. He submitted that the enfranchisement prices are as follows: House 21 £1,205.00 House 22 £1,405.00 House 23 £1,305.00 House 24 £1,365.00

Decision

45. The Tribunal noted the [NAME]’s report and agreed with the method of valuation being that under s9(1) of the 1967 Act.

46. The Tribunal also agreed with the basis upon which [NAME], the Applicant’s Surveyor, made his calculations.

47. The Tribunal therefore adopted the [NAME]’s calculations as set out in Annex 2 to these Reasons.

48. The Tribunal determined that the Premiums payable for each Property are: £1,205.00 for (House 21) 21 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,405.00 for (House 22) 22 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,305.00 for (House 23) 23 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE] £1,305.00 for (House 24) 24 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Judge JR Morris:

10

APPENDIX 1 - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the application is seeking.

11

APPENDIX 2 – VALUATION DECISION

Property: 21 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Date of Valuation:

17.12.2018 Ground Rent:

£0.02 expires 10/12/2108 Unexpired Term:

90 years Yield Capitalisation:

6.5% Modern Ground Rent Capitalisation Rate:

5.5% Deferment Rate:

4.75% Entirety Value:

£300,000.00 Site Value @ 33.33 % of Entirety Value:

£99,990.00 Section 15 Rent @ 5.5% of Site Value:

£5,499.45 Statutory Term:

50 years

Valuation Unexpired Term: Ground rent (£s pa)

£0.02

[NAME] for term of 90 years @ 6.5%

15.3315

£0.31

Statutory Term: S 15 Ground rent (£s pa)

£5,499.45 Years purchased ([NAME]) for term of 50 years @ 5.5% 16.9315 Present value (PV) deferred for 90 years @ 5.5% 0.0081

16.9315 x 0.0081

0.1371451 0.1371451 x 5499.45

£754.22

Reversion to an Estate in Fee Simple Capital Value of Reversion

£300,000.00

Present value (PV) deferred for 140 years @ 4.75% 0.0015

0.0015 x 300000

£450.00

Total

£1,204.53

Premium Payable

£1,205

12 Property: 22 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Date of Valuation:

17.12.2018 Ground Rent:

£0.02 expires 10/12/2108 Unexpired Term:

90 years Yield Capitalisation:

6.5% Modern Ground Rent Capitalisation Rate:

5.5% Deferment Rate:

4.75% Entirety Value:

£350,000.00 Site Value @ 33.33 % of Entirety Value:

£116,655.00 Section 15 Rent @ 5.5% of Site Value:

£6,416.03 Statutory Term:

50 years

Valuation Unexpired Term: Ground rent (£s pa)

£0.02

[NAME] for term of 90 years @ 6.5%

15.3315

£0.31

Statutory Term: S 15 Ground rent (£s pa)

£6,416.03 Years purchased ([NAME]) for term of 50 years @ 5.5% 16.9315 Present value (PV) deferred for 90 years @ 5.5% 0.0081

16.9315 x 0.0081

0.1371451 0.1371451 x 6416.03

£879.93

£350,000.00

Present value (PV) deferred for 140 years @ 4.75% 0.0015

0.0015 x 350000

£525.00

Total

£1,405.24

Premium Payable

£1,405.00

13 Property: 23 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Date of Valuation:

17.12.2018 Ground Rent:

£0.02 expires 10/12/2108 Unexpired Term:

90 years Yield Capitalisation:

6.5% Modern Ground Rent Capitalisation Rate:

5.5% Deferment Rate:

4.75% Entirety Value:

£325,000.00 Site Value @ 33.33 % of Entirety Value:

£108,322.50 Section 15 Rent @ 5.5% of Site Value:

£5,957.74 Statutory Term:

50 years

Valuation Unexpired Term: Ground rent (£s pa)

£0.02

[NAME] for term of 90 years @ 6.5%

15.3315

£0.31

Statutory Term: S 15 Ground rent (£s pa)

£5,957.74 Years purchased ([NAME]) for term of 50 years @ 5.5% 16.9315 Present value (PV) deferred for 90 years @ 5.5% 0.0081

16.9315 x 0.0081

0.1371451 0.1371451 x 5957.74

£817.07

£325,000.00

Present value (PV) deferred for 140 years @ 4.75% 0.0015

0.0015 x 325000

£487.50

Total

£1,304.88

Premium Payable

£1,305.00

14 Property: 24 [NAME]’s [ADDRESS], [NAME] [POSTCODE]

Date of Valuation:

17.12.2018 Ground Rent:

£0.02 expires 10/12/2108 Unexpired Term:

90 years Yield Capitalisation:

6.5% Modern Ground Rent Capitalisation Rate:

5.5% Deferment Rate:

4.75% Entirety Value:

£340,000.00 Site Value @ 33.33 % of Entirety Value:

£113,322.00 Section 15 Rent @ 5.5% of Site Value:

£6,232.71 Statutory Term:

50 years

Valuation Unexpired Term: Ground rent (£s pa)

£0.02

[NAME] for term of 90 years @ 6.5%

15.3315

£0.31

Statutory Term: S 15 Ground rent (£s pa)

£6,232.71 Years purchased ([NAME]) for term of 50 years @ 5.5% 16.9315 Present value (PV) deferred for 90 years @ 5.5% 0.0081

16.9315 x 0.0081

0.1371451 0.1371451 x 6232.71

£854.79

£340,000.00

Present value (PV) deferred for 140 years @ 4.75% 0.0015

0.0015 x 340000

£510.00

Total

£1,365.10

Premium Payable

£1,365.00

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenants qualified to purchase the freehold as they were registered proprietors for over two years.
  • The landlord could not be found, allowing the application to proceed under Section 27 of the 1967 Act.
  • The Tribunal agreed with the surveyor's method of valuation under section 9(1) of the 1967 Act.
  • The Tribunal adopted the surveyor's calculations for the enfranchisement prices.
  • The 1965 rateable value for each house was likely less than £200, making the Original Valuation Basis applicable.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the purchase prices for four properties under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about determining the purchase prices for the properties when the landlord could not be found.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, which allows tenants to acquire the freehold of their properties when the landlord cannot be found.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenants were entitled to acquire the freehold of their properties under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to acquire the freehold of their property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 if the landlord cannot be found.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents included the lease agreements, property valuations, and statutory requirements under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant Entitled to Freehold Under Leasehold Reform Act | VadeLab