VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Found in Breach of Lease Due to Repeated Water Leaks

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant breached their lease because of repeated water leaks. The tenant failed to maintain the property as required by the lease, leading to significant damage in the flat below.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant must comply with the terms of their lease, including maintenance and repair obligations.

Topics

breach of contractproperty lawtenant responsibilities

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal found the tenant in breach of their lease due to repeated water leaks.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal found the tenant in breach of their lease due to repeated water leaks, despite multiple requests for access to inspect and repair the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

In the FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Tribunal Case reference : LON/00AN/LBC/2023/0063 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted]

[COUNSEL], Solicitor Respondent : [redacted]

No appearance Type of application : Determination of breach of covenant Tribunal Judge : Judge Adrian Jack, Tribunal Member [NAME] MA MRICS Date of decision : 7th February 2024

DECISION

2

1. The applicant is the freeholder of [ADDRESS], London W6. The respondent is the holder of a long lease of the Top Floor Flat. The applicant complains that the respondent is in breach of the terms of his lease in a number of ways, all arising out of a problem of water leaks from the top (second floor) flat into the first floor flat.

2. The Tribunal inspected [ADDRESS] on the morning of 7th February 2024. It is a terraced house, typical of this area of West London, divided into three flats. The Tribunal’s directions had been sent to the parties concerning the proposed inspection. Notwithstanding this, the tenant did not appear to be in his flat and did not give access to his flat. Instead we inspected the first floor flat into which leaks were said to have come. We saw a substantial area where the ceiling had collapsed in the front living room. There was also some water staining to the wall.

The landlord’s case

3. The applicant pleads (correcting some minor grammatical and spelling infelicities):

“5. The Respondent’s obligations as they pertain to this application are set out in clauses 2, 3 and 4 and the Second and Fourth Schedule of the Respondents Lease, which reads as follows:

‘2. THE Tenant HEREBY COVENANTS with [NAME] and with and for the benefit of the owners and Lessees from time to time during the currency of the term hereby granted of the other flats comprised in the [NAME] that the Tenant and the persons deriving title under him will at all times observe the restrictions set forth in the Second Schedule hereto.

3(1) THE Tenant HEREBY COVENANTS with [NAME] that the Tenant and all persons deriving title under him will throughout the term hereby granted:-

(c)(i) Maintain uphold and keep the demised premises and all walls sewers drains pipes cables wires and the appurtenances thereto belonging well and substantially repaired cleaned maintained and renewed

(d)(i) [NAME] and its authorised surveyors or agents with or without workmen and others with tools and materials upon giving previous notice at all reasonable times but forthwith in the case of emergency to enter into and upon the demised premises or any part thereof for the purpose of viewing and examining the state and condition thereof and make good defects decays and wants of repair if which notice in writing shall be given by [NAME] to the Tenant and for which the Tenant

3 may be liable hereunder within three months after giving such notice.

(d)(ii) If the Tenant shall not have complied with [NAME]’s notice in writing within three months after the notice having been given it shall be lawful for [NAME] (but without prejudice to any other right or remedy) to enter upon the demised premises to repair and put in order the same or carry out any such works at the expense of the Tenant as 11 may then be necessary to render the demised premises in accordance with the covenants and provisions of this Lease and the costs and expenses thereby incurred by [NAME] shall be repaid to it by the Tenant upon demand

(i) [NAME] and (as respects works in connection with any neighbouring or adjoining premises) its lessees with workmen and others with tools and materials upon giving previous notice (or in the case of emergency forthwith without notice) to enter into and upon the demised premises or any part thereof at all reasonable times during the said term for the purpose of repairing any part of the [NAME] or any other adjoining or contiguous premises and for the purpose of making repairing maintaining supporting rebuilding cleansing lighting and keeping in order and good condition all roofs foundations damp courses sewers drains pipes cables water courses gutters wires party or other structures or other conveniences belonging to or serving or used for the [NAME] or any other part thereof and also for the purpose of laying down maintaining repairing testing drainage gas and water pipes and electric cables and for similar purposes and also for the purpose of cutting of water to the demises premises or any other premises in the [NAME] in respect whereof the lessee or occupier shall be in default in paying his share of water rate [NAME] or its lessees (as the case may be) making good all damage occasioned thereby to the demises premises

(l) To indemnify and keep indemnified [NAME] from and against all legal liability in respect of all loss damage actions proceedings suits claims demands damages liability and expenses in respect of any injury or the death or any person or damage to or destruction of any property moveable or immoveable by reason of or arising out of the repair state of repair condition existence or any alterations to or to the user of the demised premises and from all proceedings costs claims and demands of whatsoever nature in respect of such liability or alleged liability

4. The Tenant HEREBY COVENANTS with [NAME] and with and for the benefit or the owners and the lessees from time to time during the currency of the term hereby granted of the other flats comprised in the [NAME] that the Tenant will at all times

4 hereafter during the said term:- (1) Repair maintain uphold and keep the demised premises as to afford all necessary support shelter and protection to the parts of the [NAME] other than the demises premises and to afford the adjoining and neighbouring flats access for the purposes and subject to the conditions set out herein

The Second Schedule Restrictions imposed in respect of the demised premises

2 Not to do or permit to be done any act or thing which may render void or voidable any policy of insurance of any flat in the [NAME] or may cause an increased premium to be payable in respect thereof.

The Fourth Schedule Exceptions and Reservations

2 Power for [NAME] and its duly authorised surveyors or agents with or without workmen and others with tools and materials upon giving previous notice (or in the case of emergency to without notice) at all reasonable times enter into the demised premises for the purpose carrying out is obligations under this Lease

Alleged Breaches of Covenant

6. The Applicant has been advised by the leaseholder of the First Floor Flat… that water ingress has been experienced

13th July 2020 Leak into hallway and living room

17th November 2020 Major leak into kitchen necessitating a kitchen refit

11th February 2021 Leak into kitchen

15th July 2022 Leak into hallway

22nd August 2022 Leak into living room

26th September 2022 Significant leak in living room

20th December 2022 Leak above kitchen near gas meter

2nd February 2023 leak into hallway

3rd February 2023 leak into hallway leak

28th February 2023 Leak into hallway

5 4th April 2023 leak into hallway

5th April 2023 leak into hallway

17th June 2023 leak into hallway

7. On each occasion the water ingress has been experienced the leaseholder of the First Floor Flat has reported to the issue to the [NAME].

8. In [the] light of the frequency of the leaks at the requestion of the Applicant, the Applicant’s [NAME] managing agents instructed [NAME] to undertake an inspection of both flats in order to ascertain the source of the water ingress and to specify any required remedial action…

10. As no response was received to any of the requests for access, [NAME] were instructed to attend the property and to Flat door in the hope that the requested access would be provided. For the avoidance of doubt access was not provided as detailed in the Report of [NAME]…

11. The [NAME] has also requested access to the Respondent’s Flat in order for the Respondent’s Flat door which opens onto the common parts to be assessed in order to confirm whether or not it complies with current fire safety standards…

12. Regrettably, no reply was received to the request for access, and when the door assessor attended the [NAME] on 11th September 2023 access was not provided to the Respondent’s flat…

13. In light of the above the Applicant is contemplating forfeiture of the Respondent’s Lease and seeks a determination from the Tribunal that the Respondent has breached the covenants contained in the lease and referred to above.”

The tenant’s case

4. The tenant has not engaged with the Tribunal proceedings. He has not served any statement of case, nor filed any evidence. He did not attend the hearing of this matter held at noon on 7th February 2024.

The hearing and our determination

5. The landlord has served witness statements from Mr [APPELLANT], the tenant of the first floor flat, and Mr [COUNSEL], the landlord’s solicitor. These statements had extensive exhibits which amply bore out the allegations made the landlord as set out above. As we have noted, the respondent

6 did not attend and did not cross-examine or otherwise challenge the evidence of Mr [NAME] and Mr [NAME].

6. In these circumstances, we accept the evidence of Mr [RESPONDENT] and Mr [RESPONDENT]. We find that the landlord has proved the breaches of covenant alleged against the respondent.

Costs

7. The landlord is entitled to recover the legal costs associated with proceedings for forfeiture of the lease but this is not a matter over which we have jurisdiction. Likewise we are not asked to make any determination of these costs. The recoverability and amount of any legal costs which the landlord can recover in respect of the proceedings before us will be for a different jurisdiction to determine. We are, however, asked to make an order in respect of the fees payable to the Tribunal. These comprise the issue fee of £100 and the hearing fee of £200. Since the landlord has won, in our judgment he should have these costs.

DECISION

(a) The respondent tenant is in breach of the covenants of his lease as alleged by the applicant landlord. (b) The respondent do pay the landlord £300 in respect of the fees payable to the Tribunal.

Judge Adrian Jack 7th February 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant must comply with repair and maintenance obligations as set out in their lease agreement.
  • The tenant must not sublet or let for holidays without the landlord's written consent, as per the lease conditions.
  • A tenant must comply with lease terms regarding payment of council tax and notification of relevant notices.
  • A tenant must permit the landlord and its agents to enter the property after reasonable notice to view the condition of the flat.
  • A tenant must comply with all covenants in their lease regarding property maintenance and cleanliness.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was found in breach of their lease due to repeated water leaks.

Who was involved?

The case involved a landlord and a tenant.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the evidence presented by the landlord, including witness statements and inspections.

Which laws or rules were applied?

No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the repeated water leaks and the tenant's failure to address them.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with their lease terms, especially regarding maintenance and repairs.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Witness statements and inspection reports were crucial in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.