Tenant Granted Lease Extension Under Missing Landlord Provisions

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AY/OCE/OLR/2025/0008 Property :

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant : [redacted] [COUNSEL] : [COUNSEL] [NAME] (Solicitors) Respondent : [redacted] : Determination of terms of lease extension (missing landlord) Tribunal Member :

[NAME]

Date of Decision : 8 April 2025

DECISION

Decision The premium to be paid by the applicant for the lease extension for [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] ([NAME]) under HM Land Registry title number SGL456234 is £46,000 (Forty six thousand pounds). The draft deed attached to the applicant’s bundle, is approved.

Introduction 1. This is an application made under Section 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the Act”) for a determination of the premium to be paid and the terms of an acquisition of an extension to the leasehold interest in [NAME]. The relevant legal provisions are set out in Appendix to this decision.

2 2. [NAME] is a ground floor maisonette with its own entrance. It forms part of a small purpose built two storey building of other flats. The building is an infill within an older well established residential area in West London.

3. The Applicant is the long leaseholder of [NAME] and holds their interest under the terms of a lease dated 31 January 1986, registered under title number SGL45612. That lease was granted by the then freeholder for a term of 99 years from 25 December 1985. The lease reserves an initial ground rent of £50 pa for 33 years, rising to £100 pa for the next 33, rising to £200 pa for the last 33 years. The residual term of the lease is now vested in the applicant, registered as leasehold proprietor.

4. The registered freehold proprietor of [NAME] was vested in the respondent under title number SGL397089 on 2 February 1994.

5. By order made by District Judge Jolly in the County Court at Wandsworth on 10 February 2025 and on the Court being satisfied that the respondent could not be found, the matter was referred to this Tribunal for determination of the terms of a lease extension under S.51(5); that following this the Applicant will surrender their lease and a new lease will be granted.

6. The Tribunal approves the form of surrender and renewal and refers this case back to the Court so that the new lease will be executed by a Judge of the County Court, in accordance with S.51(3) of Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

7. The Tribunal considered the issue on the papers submitted by the applicants, without a hearing, in accordance with Directions issued on receipt by the Tribunal, of the order from the County Court. The case was to be determined on the bundle papers subsequently in 2025. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is derived from the order. Statutory Basis 8. Part 2, Schedule 13 to the Act provides that the price to be paid by the leaseholder, the applicant for the new leasehold interest where there is no intermediary head leaseholder, applies here.

9. The premium payable in respect of the grant of a new lease is the total of: (a) the diminution in value of the landlord’s interest in the tenant’s flat as determined in accordance with paragraph 3, (b) the landlord’s share of the marriage value as determined in accordance with paragraph 4, and (c) any amount of compensation payable to the landlord under paragraph 5.

3 10. The diminution is: 3(1) The diminution in value of the landlord’s interest is the difference between (a) the value of the landlord’s interest in the tenant’s flat prior to the grant of the new lease; and (b) the value of his interest in the flat once the new lease is granted.

11. Paragraph 4 of the Schedule, as amended, provides that the freeholder's share of the marriage value is to be 50%, and that any marriage value is to be ignored where the unexpired term of the lease exceeds eighty years at the valuation date. Here it is included as the unexpired term is less than eighty years.

12. Paragraph 5 of the Schedule provides for the payment of compensation for other loss resulting from the enfranchisement. Evidence 13. The applicant provided a valuation report dated January 2025, by Mit Kotak BA(Hons) PGDip MRICS Registered Valuer of [NAME] of 40 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“Valuation Report” or “Report”).

14. Having considered the contents of the Valuation Report and the opinions expressed by [NAME], the Tribunal is satisfied that the method adopted is appropriate to determine the premium for the new lease for [NAME]. The Tribunal accepts the description of [NAME] and its location as stated.

15. A photograph of the front exterior of [NAME] within the building of which it forms part, was included in the Valuation Report. The Tribunal did not consider it necessary or proportionate to carry out an inspection of [NAME]. Valuation 16. As reported, the ground floor maisonette No.2 at No.[ADDRESS], consists of: A ground floor outside entrance door and hallway, kitchen, bathroom & WC, living room and two double bedrooms. It has its own small rear garden and space for parking one car off road, to the front. The GIA is 63.36m2 or 682ft2. [NAME] has UPVC windows double glazed and full gas fired central heating. No tenant’s improvements have been identified. [NAME] was in ‘fair’ condition in compliance with the lease obligations.

17. The valuation date prescribed by section 51(1) of the Act is the date of the applicants’ application to the court namely 24 October 2022. The unexpired residue of the lease for [NAME] is 62.07 years at AVD.

4 18. [NAME]’s assessment of the market value of the flat is based on evidence of completed sales of 4No. and of 1No. ‘under offer sale’, all of 2 bedroom comparables. The ‘under offer’ flat sale is of No.3 in the same 4 flat block as this Property. It had a newly extended lease wef 2020 a a peppercorn. The other sales are all from a purpose block, a recent gated community – [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS] within 100m of this Property. A purpose built low rise relatively small and modern block of flats.

19. These 4No. comparable flats have long unexpired leases ranging from 105 to 107 years. Their sales range from 11 July 2022 to 17 March 2022. There GIAs from 603 to 632ft2. The range of sizes being slightly smaller than [NAME] but are arranged around the AVD. [NAME] makes small allowance for time and takes the conventional uplift of 1% addition to reach the virtual FHVP value for all 4No. and for the flat sold under offer in the same block, at No.2.

20. Overall the Tribunal is satisfied with the relevance and detail of the five comparable property sales or pending sales, as provided in the Valuation Report and weighting accorded. It accepts [NAME]’s analysis of each in assessment of value of a new long lease here.

21. There is a small range in the FHVP values after adjustment for time, from approximately £319,000 t0 £376,000 overall. [NAME] appears to place equal weight on all 5No. comparables. [NAME] deducts £20,000 from 2 of the Beechcroft comparables on the FHVP, on account of both having been recently refurbished. All flats have private or gated communal gardens and at least one allocated parking space off road, so need no adjustment. [NAME] deducts 2.5% from the value of [NAME] on account of it being on a ground floor rather than the first and third floor levels of the comparables at Beechcroft.

22. The best comparable is said to be that of the two bed ground floor flat in the same block. It was subject of a Tribunal determination under the “Missing Landlord” provisions, in 2021 with which the Tribunal happens to be familiar, though the weight of such must be lower than the analysis of more recent sales around the AVD of this Property. Flat 3 was under offer at £375,000 near the AVD with 149 years unexpired.

23. The Tribunal notes and accepts the 1% adjustment by [NAME] in uplifting the extended long lease value to its notional freehold value.

24. As for relativity between short and long leasehold values for the unexpired term, [NAME] considered and adopted the use of graphs from the Deritend case of 2020 as fully cited in the Report. [NAME] takes a Relativity percentage of some 79.68% on 62.07 years unexpired here for the short leasehold value. When applied to the FHVP value for [NAME], taken by [NAME] to be £375,000 it gives a short leasehold value of £298,800.

5 25. The Tribunal accepts these steps and the conclusions.

26. The diminution in the value of the landlord's interest in the tenant’s maisonette is represented first by the capitalised value of the ground rent receivable under their lease, now at £100 and later £200 pa after the last fixed review. The calculations of these modest rents at 7% capitalisation yield referenced in the report, are adopted.

27. Secondly the effect of the lease extension will deprive the landlord of [NAME] for a further 90 years in addition to the current unexpired term. The present value of that delayed reversion is determined by applying a deferment rate to the freehold value of the flat. The deferment rate appropriate for leasehold flats in Central London was authoritatively determined to be 5% in the case of [NAME] (2006) LRA/50/2005. [NAME] also adopts the [NAME] deferment rate of 5% for this flat, which the Tribunal accepts.

28. The marriage value is then to be shared equally between the parties, 50:50 as required by the Act.

29. The Tribunal approves the assumptions, form, content and layout of the valuation set out the Report. It therefore does not produce its own.

30. The premium to be paid by the applicant for the new lease of [NAME] is therefore determined at £46,000. (Forty six thousand pounds). The draft deed attached to the applicant’s bundle is approved. Name: [APPELLANT]: 8 April 2025

6 Appendix

Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993

S.50 Applications where landlord cannot be found. (1) Where— (a) a qualifying tenant of a flat desires to make a claim to exercise the right to acquire a new lease of his flat, but (b) the landlord cannot be found or his identity cannot be ascertained, the court may, on the application of the tenant, make a vesting order under this subsection. (2) Where— (a) a qualifying tenant of a flat desires to make such a claim as is mentioned in subsection (1), and (b) paragraph (b) of that subsection does not apply, but (c) a copy of a notice of that claim cannot be given in accordance with Part I of Schedule 11 to any person to whom it would otherwise be required to be so given because that person cannot be found or his identity cannot be ascertained, the court may, on the application of the tenant, make an order dispensing with the need to give a copy of such a notice to that person. (3) The court shall not make an order on any application under subsection (1) or (2) unless it is satisfied— (a) that on the date of the making of the application the tenant had the right to acquire a new lease of his flat; and (b) that on that date he would not have been precluded by any provision of this Chapter from giving a valid notice under section 42 with respect to his flat. (4) Before making any such order the court may require the tenant to take such further steps by way of advertisement or otherwise as the court thinks proper for the purpose of tracing the person in question; and if, after an application is made for a vesting order under subsection (1) and before any lease is executed in pursuance of the application, the landlord is traced, then no further proceedings shall be taken with a view to a lease being so executed, but (subject to subsection (5))— (a) the rights and obligations of all parties shall be determined as if the tenant had, at the date of the application, duly given notice under section 42 of his claim to exercise the right to acquire a new lease of his flat; and (b) the court may give such directions as the court thinks fit as to the steps to be taken for giving effect to those rights and obligations, including directions modifying or dispensing with any of the requirements of this Chapter or of regulations made under this Part.

7 (5) An application for a vesting order under subsection (1) may be withdrawn at any time before execution of a lease under section 51(3) and, after it is withdrawn, subsection (4)(a) above shall not apply; but where any step is taken (whether by the landlord or the tenant) for the purpose of giving effect to subsection (4)(a) in the case of any application, the application shall not afterwards be withdrawn except— (a) with the consent of the landlord, or (b) by leave of the court, and the court shall not give leave unless it appears to the court just to do so by reason of matters coming to the knowledge of the tenant in consequence of the tracing of the landlord. (6) Where an order has been made under subsection (2) dispensing with the need to give a copy of a notice under section 42 to a [NAME] with respect to any flat, then if— (a) a notice is subsequently given under that section with respect to that flat, and (b) in reliance on the order, a copy of the notice is not to be given to that person, the notice must contain a statement of the effect of the order. (7) Where a notice under section 42 contains such a statement in accordance with subsection (6) above, then in determining for the purposes of any provision of this Chapter whether the requirements of Part I of Schedule 11 have been complied with in relation to the notice, those requirements shall be deemed to have been complied with so far as relating to the giving of a copy of the notice to the person referred to in subsection (6) above.

51 Supplementary provisions relating to vesting orders under section 50(1). (1) A vesting order under section 50(1) is an order providing for the surrender of the tenant’s lease of his flat and for the granting to him of a new lease of it on such terms as may be determined by a leasehold valuation tribunal to be appropriate with a view to the lease being granted to him in like manner (so far as the circumstances permit) as if he had, at the date of his application, given notice under section 42 of his claim to exercise the right to acquire a new lease of his flat. (2) If a leasehold valuation tribunal so determines in the case of a vesting order under section 50(1), the order shall have effect in relation to property which is less extensive than that specified in the application on which the order was made. (3) Where any lease is to be granted to a tenant by virtue of a vesting order under section 50(1), then on his paying into court the appropriate sum there shall be executed by such person as the court may designate a lease which— (a) is in a form approved by a leasehold valuation tribunal, and

8 (b) contains such provisions as may be so approved for the purpose of giving effect so far as possible to section 56(1) and section 57 (as that section applies in accordance with subsections (7) and (8) below); and that lease shall be effective to vest in the person to whom it is granted [NAME] expressed to be demised by it, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the lease. (4) In connection with the determination by a leasehold valuation tribunal of any question as to [NAME] to be demised by any such lease, or as to the rights with or subject to which it is to be demised, it shall be assumed (unless the contrary is shown) that the landlord has no interest in property other than [NAME] to be demised and, for the purpose of excepting them from the lease, any minerals underlying that property. (5) The appropriate sum to be paid into court in accordance with subsection (3) is the aggregate of— (a) such amount as may be determined by a leasehold valuation tribunal to be the premium which is payable under Schedule 13 in respect of the grant of the new lease; (b) such other amount or amounts (if any) as may be determined by such a tribunal to be payable by virtue of that Schedule in connection with the grant of that lease; and (c) any amounts or estimated amounts determined by such a tribunal as being, at the time of execution of that lease, due to the landlord from the tenant (whether due under or in respect of the tenant’s lease of his flat or under or in respect of any agreement collateral thereto). (6) Where any lease is granted to a person in accordance with this section, the payment into court of the appropriate sum shall be taken to have satisfied any claims against the tenant, his personal representatives or assigns in respect of the premium and any other amounts payable as mentioned in subsection (5)(a) and (b). (7) Subject to subsection (8), the following provisions, namely— (a) sections 57 to 59, and (b) section 61 and Schedule 14, shall, so far as capable of applying to a lease granted in accordance with this section, apply to such a lease as they apply to a lease granted under section 56; and subsections (6) and (7) of that section shall apply in relation to a lease granted in accordance with this section as they apply in relation to a lease granted under that section. (8) In its application to a lease granted in accordance with this section— (a) section 57 shall have effect as if— (i) any reference to the relevant date were a reference to the date of the application under section 50(1) in pursuance of which the vesting order under that provision was made, and (ii) in subsection (5) the reference to section 56(3)(a) were a reference to subsection (5)(c) above; and

9 (b) section 58 shall have effect as if— (i) in subsection (3) the second reference to the landlord were a reference to the person designated under subsection (3) above, and (ii) subsections (6)(a) and (7) were omitted.