Tenant Granted Right to Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal to acquire the freehold interest in their property. The Tribunal followed the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 and determined the price payable for the freehold interest to be £75.00.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to acquire the freehold interest in their property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the price for the freehold interest in a property based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the price payable for the freehold interest in a property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The Tribunal agreed with the valuation provided by the tenant's representative and set the price at £75.00.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/OOCG/OAF/2022/0035 Property : 121 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] [COMPANY] Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] of Application : Leasehold Reform Act 1967, Section 21(1)(a) Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge J.E. Oliver Tribunal Member J. Faulkner Date of Determination : 20th January 2023 Date of Decision : 2nd February 2023
DECISION
Decision
1. The price payable for the freehold interest in [ADDRESS], Sheffield is £75.00.
Application
2. This is an application by [APPELLANT] (“the Applicant”) for the Tribunal to determine the price payable for the freehold interest in [ADDRESS], Sheffield (“the Property”) pursuant to section 9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (“the Act”).
3. The Applicant holds the leasehold interest in the Property.
4. The Property is held under a lease (“the Lease”) dated 9th December 1938 for a term of 800 years from 25th March 1936.
5. The Respondents to the application are the freeholders who are the Executors of [NAME] [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT].
6. The Applicant served a Notice of Tenant’s Claim to Acquire the Freehold pursuant to the Act (“the Notice”) on the Respondents agent, [NAME] [COMPANY] by a letter dated 7th February 2022. There was no substantive response to the Notice and the Applicant thereafter issued her application to the Tribunal on 23rd August 2022 7. Directions were issued on 17th October 2022 for the parties to file and serve statements and a bundle of documents and for the matter then to be determined on paper without an inspection.
8. The Respondents did not file any documents as directed by the Tribunal.
The Property
9. The Tribunal relied upon the description of the Property given by [COMPANY] in their valuation sent by letter to the [NAME] on 25th August 2022. 10. The valuation describes the Property as a three bedroomed semi-detached house, built in 1930 and “for Leasehold Reform Act purposes can be generously valued at £300,000”.
Submissions
11. [COMPANY] advised the ground rent payable under the Lease is £4.10 shillings per annum, equivalent to £4.50 per annum when decimalised. The remaining term is 715 years.
12. It was said there are no terms under the Lease to prevent a valuation pursuant to Section 9(1) of the Act. Consequently, the valuation only requires the freeholder to be compensated for their right to collect the existing ground rent for the remainder of the Lease. This is calculated as the ground rent of £4.50 deferred at a rate of 6.5% for 715 years, equivalent to £77.00.
Determination
13. The valuation date is the date of the Applicant’s Notice which is 3rd March 2022. The Lease is for 800 years from 25th March 1936 and the Tribunal therefore agrees the unexpired term is 715 years.
14. The valuation approach under section 9(1) of the Act has three stages: (1) capitalise the annual rent until the expiry of the term; calculate the modern ground rent under a 50 year extension, capitalise this and then defer the capitalised sum, to the valuation date; (3) defer the market value of the standing house for the unexpired lease term plus the extended lease term of 50 years.
15. There are two possible relevant valuations that could be applicable to this property. The correct one is determined by the rateable value of the property at 31st March 1990. If that value was £500 or less then section 9(1) applies; if more than £500, section 9(1)(a) applies. Here, the Applicant has advised the rateable value at the relevant date was £137.
16. However, there will be no difference in the valuations. The market value of a property that has 715 years remaining will not reduce even if there was a notional extension of the lease of 50 years as provided by section 9(1).
17. The Tribunal accepts the valuation should be a simple capitalisation of the ground rent. The Applicant has provided a simple valuation for a ground rent of £4.50 for a remaining term of 715 years, subject to a deferment rate of 6.5%, giving a capital value of £77.00. The Tribunal notes this calculation is, in fact, incorrect. A capitalisation rate of 6.5% gives a Year’s Purchase of 15.3864 (100/6.5). When multiplied by the ground rent of £4.50, this produces £69.23.
18. The Tribunal considers the widely accepted capitalisation rate of 6% should be applied, rather than 6.5%.
19. The Tribunal therefore determines that the price payable under Section 9(1) of the Act for the freehold interest in the Property is £75.00.
Tribunal Judge J Oliver 2nd February 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Acquire Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Ac…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Valuation of Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Buy Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Premium Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Purchase Price at £13,160
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Buy Freehold Interest
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Acquire Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Ac…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Freehold Premium for Property Enfranchisement
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant was entitled to acquire the freehold interest under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
- The unexpired term of the lease was 715 years.
- The valuation should be a simple capitalisation of the ground rent.
- The widely accepted capitalisation rate of 6% should be applied.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined the price payable for the freehold interest in the property to be £75.00.
Who was involved?
The tenant applied to acquire the freehold interest in their property, while the freeholders were represented by a legal firm.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, agreeing with the valuation provided by the tenant's representative.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was applied to determine the price for the freehold interest.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation of the freehold interest was the central argument, focusing on the ground rent and the remaining term of the lease.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may apply to the First-tier Tribunal to acquire the freehold interest in their property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation provided by the tenant's representative was crucial in determining the price for the freehold interest.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
