VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Granted Right to Manage Premises Under Leasehold Reform Act

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The tribunal determined that the applicant had complied with the statutory requirements, including providing a register of members and serving the claim notice correctly.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to acquire the right to manage their premises if they comply with the statutory requirements under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

Topics

right to manageleasehold reformproperty management

Provisions

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s.78Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s.79Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s.80

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal ruled that the applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The tribunal determined that the applicant had complied with the statutory requirements, including providing a register of members and serving the claim notice correctly.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AH/LRM/2019/0014 Property : 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL]; Solicitors Type of [NAME] : Right to manage Tribunal member : Judge [NAME] of decision : 6th August 2019

DECISION

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the Applicant was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act, and the Applicant will acquire such right within three months after this determination becomes final. The [NAME]

2 1. This was an [NAME] to acquire the right to manage 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the premises”) under Part 2 of Chapter 1 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 ("the Act"). The Respondent freeholder has served a counter-notice disputing the claim alleging that the applicant had failed to establish compliance with various sections of the Act.

2. The property contains just two flats. The flat on the ground and basement floors is [ADDRESS] and the owners of the flat are [NAME] and [NAME]. (The property is leasehold for a term of 125 years from and including 14 September 2015 and is registered at the Land Registry under title number SGL763859). The flat on the first and second floors is [ADDRESS] and is owned by [NAME], (The property is leasehold for a term of 125 years from and including 14 September 2015 and is registered at the Land Registry under title number SGL763861). The law 3. The relevant provisions of the Act in particular mentioned by the respondent are set out in the appendix to this decision. Rights of appeal are set out in the annex to this decision. The counter-notice 4. In its counter-notice, the Respondent raised alleged issues or breaches in regard to sections 78(1), 79(2), 79(3), 79(8), 80(3), 80(8) and 80(9) of the Act. Having considered the copy deeds, letters, emails and documents in the two bundles, (one from each party), the tribunal has made the following decisions. The issues or alleged breaches 5. With regard to s.79(3), membership, the respondent asserts that no register of members has been provided. The respondent also asserts that [RESPONDENT] was not a subscriber to the company. With regard to sections 78(1) and 79(2) the respondent asserts that Ms [RESPONDENT] “who was not a subscriber but may have been incorrectly noted as a member did not receive the benefit of a notice inviting participation as required” by statute.

6. With regard to s.79(8) the respondent says that there is no evidence of service of the claim notice on the [NAME] tenants. With regard to sections 80 (3), 80 (8) and 80 (9) the respondent asserts that there may be errors within the notice as the respondent says it incorrectly names [NAME] as a member and by doing so breaches sections 80 (8) and 80 (9) of the Act.

3 7. In response the applicant observed that the claim notice had been correctly and lawfully served on the landlord and consequently the applicant is entitled to acquire the right to manage. More specifically and in response to the point regarding membership the applicant says that all [NAME] tenants are members of the [COMPANY] and a copy of the register of members was disclosed to the tribunal to confirm this assertion. Secondly and in response to the point about Ms [APPELLANT] the applicant confirmed that she was not a subscriber but that she joined the company shortly afterwards. A copy of her signed [NAME] was also disclosed to the Tribunal. This was on 19 April 2019. The claim notice was dated 23 April 2019.

8. Regarding the issue relating to the notice on invitation to participate, the applicant says that all [NAME] tenants have agreed to be members and as such no notices of invitation to participate are required to be served. The applicant also confirms that the claim notice was served on all the [NAME] tenants. A Mr [NAME] submitted a witness statement to the Tribunal to confirm this. He did so saying “I act for Prime Management ([COMPANY], the company secretary of [ADDRESS] (Croydon) [COMPANY].” He thus confirmed that claim notices were given to all the [NAME] tenants. The Tribunal's decision 9. The Tribunal is mindful of the following decisions. First in the Upper Tribunal [COMPANY] V 110 [COMPANY] [2017] UKUT 316 (LC) and secondly in the Court of [COMPANY] [COMPANY] v Avon Freeholds Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 89. These cases were concerned with issues very much in line with those raised in this case. In Assethold a quote is included from Elim stating that: -

“In para 57 and 58 he (Lewison LJ) approved the following passage: Finally, it may be that even non-compliance with a requirement is not fatal. In all such cases, it is necessary to consider the words of the statute or contract, in the light of its subject matter, the background, the purpose of the requirement, if that is known or determined, and the actual or possible effect of non-compliance on the parties.” 10. In [NAME] LJ observed: - “I have drawn attention to the Government's policy that the procedures should be as simple as possible to reduce the potential for challenge by an obstructive landlord. That policy has not been implemented by the current procedures which still

4 contain traps for the unwary. This is, we were told, the third attempt by the [COMPANY] to acquire the right to manage [ADDRESS]. The Government may wish to consider simplifying the procedure further, or to grant the FTT a power to relieve against a failure to comply with the requirements if it is just and equitable to do so. Otherwise I fear that objections based on technical points which are of no significant consequence to the objector will continue to bedevil the acquisition of the right to manage.” 11. Taking into account all these factors the Tribunal determines the notice of invitation to participate is valid. It does so as it is persuaded by the evidence of the applicant more particularly set out in the paragraphs above. The Tribunal accepts that all the issues raised by the respondent fall by the wayside in the light of the evidence and documentation issued by the applicant. [NAME] tenants are members of the [COMPANY]. Ms [NAME] is clearly involved in the company and was so prior to the issuing of the claim notice. [NAME] tenants have agreed to be members of the company and so this deals with the issue around notices of invitation. Finally, the Tribunal notes and accepts that the claim notice was served on all [NAME] tenants. Summary 12. Overall, the Tribunal determines that the Applicant was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act.

13. Therefore, in accordance with section 90(4) within three months after this determination becomes final the Applicant will acquire the right to manage these premises. According to section 84(7): “(7) A determination on an [NAME] under subsection (3) becomes final— (a) if not appealed against, at the end of the period for bringing an appeal, or (b) if appealed against, at the time when the appeal (or any further appeal) is disposed of.” Costs 14. Section 88(3) of the Act states: “(3) A [COMPANY] is liable for any costs which such a person incurs as party to any proceedings under this Chapter before a leasehold valuation tribunal only if the tribunal dismisses an

5 [NAME] by the company for a determination that it is entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises.” 15. In the light of the Tribunal’s decision, there is no question of awarding any costs of the proceedings to the Respondent because the [NAME] for the right to acquire has not been dismissed.

Name: Judge Professor Robert Abbey Date: 6th August 2019

6 ANNEX

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

7 APPENDIX

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002

78 Notice inviting participation (1)[NAME] a claim to acquire the right to manage any premises, a [COMPANY] must give notice to each person who at the time when the notice is given— (a)is [NAME] of a flat contained in the premises, but (b)neither is nor has agreed to become a member of the [COMPANY]. (2)A notice given under this section (referred to in this Chapter as a “notice of invitation to participate”) must— (a)state that the [COMPANY] intends to acquire the right to manage the premises, (b)state the names of the members of the [COMPANY], (c)invite the recipients of the notice to become members of the company, and (d)contain such other particulars (if any) as may be required to be contained in notices of invitation to participate by regulations made by the appropriate national authority. (3)A notice of invitation to participate must also comply with such requirements (if any) about the form of notices of invitation to participate as may be prescribed by regulations so made. (4)A notice of invitation to participate must either— (a)be accompanied by a copy of the articles of association of the [COMPANY], or (b)include a statement about inspection and copying of the articles of association of the [COMPANY]. (5)A statement under subsection (4)(b) must— (a)specify a place (in England or Wales) at which the articles of association may be inspected, (b)specify as the times at which they may be inspected periods of at least two hours on each of at least three days (including a Saturday or Sunday or both) within the seven days beginning with the day following that on which the notice is given, (c)specify a place (in England or Wales) at which, at any time within those seven days, a copy of the articles of association may be ordered, and (d)specify a fee for the provision of an ordered copy, not exceeding the reasonable cost of providing it. (6)Where a notice given to a person includes a statement under subsection (4)(b), the notice is to be treated as not having been given to him if he is not allowed to undertake an inspection, or is not provided with a copy, in accordance with the statement. (7)A notice of invitation to participate is not invalidated by any inaccuracy in any of the particulars required by or by virtue of this section.

8

79 Notice of claim to acquire right (1)A claim to acquire the right to manage any premises is made by giving notice of the claim (referred to in this Chapter as a “claim notice”); and in this Chapter the “relevant date”, in relation to any claim to acquire the right to manage, means the date on which notice of the claim is given. (2)The claim notice may not be given unless each person required to be given a notice of invitation to participate has been given such a notice at least 14 days before. (3)The claim notice must be given by a [COMPANY] which complies with subsection (4) or (5). (4)If on the relevant date there are only two [NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises, both must be members of the [COMPANY]. (5)In any other case, the membership of the [COMPANY] must on the relevant date include a number of [NAME] tenants of flats contained in the premises which is not less than one-half of the total number of flats so contained. (6)The claim notice must be given to each person who on the relevant date is— (a)landlord under a lease of the whole or any part of the premises, (b)party to such a lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (c)a manager appointed under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (c. 31) (referred to in this Part as “the 1987 Act”) to act in relation to the premises, or any premises containing or contained in the premises. (7)Subsection (6) does not require the claim notice to be given to a person who cannot be found or whose identity cannot be ascertained; but if this subsection means that the claim notice is not required to be given to anyone at all, section 85 applies. (8)A copy of the claim notice must be given to each person who on the relevant date is [NAME] of a flat contained in the premises. (9)Where a manager has been appointed under Part 2 of the 1987 Act to act in relation to the premises, or any premises containing or contained in the premises, a copy of the claim notice must also be given to the tribunal or court by which he was appointed.

80 Contents of claim notice (1)The claim notice must comply with the following requirements. (2)It must specify the premises and contain a statement of the grounds on which it is claimed that they are premises to which this Chapter applies. (3)It must state the full name of each person who is both— (a)[NAME] of a flat contained in the premises, and (b)a member of the [COMPANY], and the address of his flat.

9 (4)And it must contain, in relation to each such person, such particulars of his lease as are sufficient to identify it, including— (a)the date on which it was entered into, (b)the term for which it was granted, and (c)the date of the commencement of the term. (5)It must state the name and registered office of the [COMPANY]. (6)It must specify a date, not earlier than one month after the relevant date, by which each person who was given the notice under section 79(6) may respond to it by giving a counter-notice under section 84. (7)It must specify a date, at least three months after that specified under subsection (6), on which the [COMPANY] intends to acquire the right to manage the premises. (8)It must also contain such other particulars (if any) as may be required to be contained in claim notices by regulations made by the appropriate national authority. (9)And it must comply with such requirements (if any) about the form of claim notices as may be prescribed by regulations so made.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The applicant company was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises.
  • All leasehold tenants were members of the applicant company.
  • The individual named as a member was clearly involved in the company before the claim notice was issued.
  • The claim notice was properly served on all leasehold tenants.
  • The notice of invitation to participate was valid.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The respondent's arguments regarding alleged issues or breaches of the Act were not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal ruled that the applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant who wanted to manage their own building and a landlord who disputed the claim.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the tenant because the tenant had complied with the statutory requirements for acquiring the right to manage the premises.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, specifically sections 78, 79, and 80 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenant had provided a register of members and served the claim notice correctly.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with all statutory requirements when applying for the right to manage their premises.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents such as the register of members and proof of service of the claim notice were crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this to ensure compliance with all statutory requirements.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.