VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Must Pay Capital Expenditures Service Charges

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that a tenant must pay estimated service charges for capital expenditures if the charges are reasonable and the tenant has not challenged them. The ruling was made by Judge Simon Brilliant on 9 September 2019.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable to pay estimated service charges for capital expenditures if the charges are reasonable and the tenant has not challenged them.

Topics

service chargescapital expenditureslandlord and tenant disputes

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.18Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.19Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20BCommonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.18

A 'service charge' refers to an amount paid by a tenant as part of or in addition to rent, which can cover services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance, or the landlord's management costs. It can also vary based on the costs incurred by the landlord.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.19

Service charges must be reasonable, considering the actual costs incurred by the landlord and ensuring that the services or works provided are of a reasonable standard.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal ruled on the reasonableness of service charges for capital expenditures.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that the tenant must pay estimated service charges for capital expenditures if the charges are reasonable and the tenant has not challenged them. The decision was made by Judge Simon Brilliant on 9 September 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BE/LSC/2019/0203 Property : 63 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative :

Respondent : [redacted] (2) Ms [COUNSEL] :

Type of [NAME] : For the determination of the reasonableness of and the liability to pay a service charge Tribunal member : Judge S Brilliant Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 9 September 2019

DECISION

2 Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the sum of £4,375.95 is payable by the Respondent in respect of the estimated service charges for the years 2015/6 and 2016/7. (2) Since the tribunal has no jurisdiction over county court costs and fees, or the state of the running account between the parties, this matter should now be referred back to the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch. The [NAME]

1. The Applicant seeks a determination pursuant to s.27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”) as to the amount of service charges payable by the Respondents in respect of the service charge years 1 April 2015-31 March 2106 and 1 April 2016-31 March 2017.

2. Proceedings were originally issued under claim no. D5QZ2Q1T in the County Court Business Centre. The claim was transferred to the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch and then in turn transferred to this tribunal, by order of District Judge Bell on 4 June 2019.

3. The relevant legal provisions are set out in the Appendix to this decision. The hearing 4. The [NAME] was heard on paper as neither party had requested an oral hearing and the tribunal did not consider one necessary or proportionate. The Applicant provided a statement of case and a hearing bundle. The Respondents did not comply with any of the directions made on 19 June 2019 and did not engage in the proceedings. The background 5. The property which is the subject of this [NAME] is a first and ground floor flat in a very large estate owned by the Applicant.

6. Neither party requested an inspection and the tribunal did not consider that one was necessary, nor would it have been proportionate to the issues in dispute.

7. The Respondents hold a long right to buy lease of the property which requires the landlord to provide services and the tenant to contribute towards their costs by way of a variable service charge. Provision is made for advance estimated service charges.

3 The issues 8. The sole issue is whether the Respondents are liable to pay estimated service charges of £4,375.95 for the years 1 April 2015-31 March 2106 (£1,750.38) and 1 April 2016-31 March 2017 (£2,625.57).

9. These service charges all relate to one off substantial capital expenditure being carried out by the Applicant at the Respondents’ estate. The expenditure is being incurred in carrying out primary and secondary mains renewal work to the underground heating system. The total anticipated cost is £2,780,727.90. The Respondents’ share is £3,783.30 plus £194.84 professional fee and £397.81 administration fee. These sums total £4,375.95.

10. The Respondents have not challenged the reasonableness or payability of these charges.

11. The County Court Defence complains of inefficient and expensive heating and hot water supplies and a failure to clean the common parts. None of this relates directly to the capital expenditure the subject matter of these proceedings. There is no Counterclaim.

12.

Accordingly, no or no arguable challenge has been made to the amount in issue in these proceedings. The tribunal’s decision 13. The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of service charges is £4,375.95.

14. The tribunal has no jurisdiction over the state of account between the parties, ground rent or county court costs. This matter should now be returned to the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch.

Name: [NAME]: 9 September 2019

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

4 If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

5 Appendix of relevant legislation

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 18 (1) In the following provisions of this Act "service charge" means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent - (a) which is payable, directly or indirectly, for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements or insurance or the landlord's costs of management, and (b) the whole or part of which varies or may vary according to the relevant costs. (2) The relevant costs are the costs or estimated costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf of the landlord, or a [NAME], in connection with the matters for which the service charge is payable. (3) For this purpose - (a) "costs" includes overheads, and (b) costs are relevant costs in relation to a service charge whether they are incurred, or to be incurred, in the period for which the service charge is payable or in an earlier or later period. Section 19 (1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the amount of a service charge payable for a period - (a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred, and (b) where they are incurred on the provisions of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard; and the amount payable shall be limited accordingly. (2) Where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred, no greater amount than is reasonable is so payable, and after the relevant costs have been incurred any necessary adjustment shall be made by repayment, reduction or subsequent charges or otherwise. Section 27A (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable,

6 (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An [NAME] may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No [NAME] under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are limited in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement—

7 (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is limited to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations is limited to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20B (1) If any of the relevant costs taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge were incurred more than 18 months before a demand for payment of the service charge is served on the tenant, then (subject to subsection (2)), the tenant shall not be liable to pay so much of the service charge as reflects the costs so incurred. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply if, within the period of 18 months beginning with the date when the relevant costs in question were incurred, the tenant was notified in writing that those costs had been incurred and that he would subsequently be required under the terms of his lease to contribute to them by the payment of a service charge. Section 20C (1) A tenant may make an [NAME] for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are

8 not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the [NAME]. (2) The [NAME] shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal; (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the [NAME] is made may make such order on the [NAME] as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances. Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11, paragraph 1 (1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals, (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a dwelling the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act.

9 (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Schedule 11, paragraph 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. Schedule 11, paragraph 5 (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to— (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a dwelling (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or

10 (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined that the estimated service charges for 2015/6 and 2016/7 were payable by the respondent.
  • The service charges were related to substantial capital expenditure for renewing the underground heating system.
  • The respondents did not challenge the reasonableness or payability of the charges.
  • The respondents did not engage in the proceedings or comply with any directions.
  • The complaints raised in the County Court Defence did not directly relate to the capital expenditure in question.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision determined that the tenant must pay estimated service charges for capital expenditures if the charges are reasonable and unchallenged.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant and a landlord, with the landlord seeking a determination of the reasonableness of service charges.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant must pay the service charges because the charges were reasonable and the tenant had not challenged them.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the service charges were reasonable and the tenant had not contested them.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure that the service charges are reasonable and not contested if they want to avoid paying them.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the estimated costs of the capital expenditures and the lack of challenge from the tenant.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving service charges.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.