VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant's Fair Rent Determination Capped Under Rent Acts Order 1999

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant but capped it at a lower amount due to specific regulations. This means the tenant will pay a capped rent rather than the originally calculated fair rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Retail Price Index and additional statutory adjustments.

Topics

fair rentmaximum fair rentrent cap

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent but capped it under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,400 per month but capped it at £1,263.50 due to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAM/LON/00AM/F77/2023/0346

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 54 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge I [NAME] [NAME] (Econ) MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1263.50 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 16 January 2024

3. The amount for services is not applicable Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

not applicable Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

n/a

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1,400 per month.

Chairman Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of decision 16 January 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 305.5

X 377.3 Minus Y 305.5 = (A) 71.8

(A) 71.8 Divided by Y 305.5 = (B) 0.235024

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.285024

Last registered rent* 983 Multiplied by (C) = 1,263.17 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1,263.5

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,263.17 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference:

LON/00AM/F77/2023/0346

Property:

54 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant: `

Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord:

[APPELLANT] of Objection:

10 September 2023

Type of Application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal:

Judge I [NAME] [NAME] (Econ) MRICS

Date of Summary Reasons

: 16 January 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £1,263.50 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 January 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. There were no written submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,500 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Assuming a dated kitchen and bathroom, tenant’s floor coverings, curtains, white goods and decoration obligation under the terms of the tenancy and the reported existence of damp and mould and disrepair.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£2,500

Less Deductions above

)

) approx. 30% )

£750

£1,750

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£350

£1,400

7. The Tribunal determines a fair rent of £1,400 per calendar month.

Decision 8. However, the rent is capped under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 in the sum of £1263.50 per month.

Tribunal Judge: [NAME]: 16 January 2024

3

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The court allows claims when the tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The court considers the Retail Price Index as a key factor in calculating fair rent.
  • The court takes into account the current market conditions and the state of the property for fair rent determination.
  • The court allows claims when the fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The court considers the scarcity of properties and tenant improvements when determining a fair rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The court dismissed the case where the tenant requested a fair rent calculation without addressing the necessary statutory adjustments.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent for a tenant but capped it at a lower amount.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Retail Price Index and statutory adjustments, capping the rent under specific regulations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also have their fair rent capped under these regulations.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The papers provided by the parties were considered, but there were no written submissions.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed, but specific procedures must be followed.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.