Tenant's Rent Repayment Order Application Rejected Due to Timing Issues
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled against a tenant's request for a rent repayment order because the application was submitted too late. The alleged offence occurred more than 12 months ago, making the application invalid under the Housing Act 2004 and 2016.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is not entitled to apply for a rent repayment order if the alleged offence occurred more than 12 months prior to the application.
📖 What the law says
A tenant can apply for a rent repayment order if the offense relates to housing they rented at the time of the offense and if the offense was committed within two years before the application.
This section allows a local housing authority to issue a temporary exemption notice to a person managing an HMO that needs a license but isn't licensed yet, exempting the HMO from licensing requirements for up to three months.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's application for a rent repayment order was dismissed due to timing issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) dismissed the tenant's application for a rent repayment order due to the application being made out of time, as the alleged offence occurred over 12 months prior to the application. The decision was based on sections 41(2) and 62(2) of the Housing Act 2004 and 2016 respectively.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Refused
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AP/HMF/2024/0188
Property : 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] : [NAME], Justice for Tenants
Respondent: [redacted] In person
Type of Application : Application by Tenant for rent repayment order. Sections 40,41, 43 & 44 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Tribunal
: Judge [NAME], FCIEH CEnvH M.Sc
Date of Hearing : 21 January 2025
Date of Decision : 21 January 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 DECISION
1. The application is made out of time because the claim relates to an offence that ended on 3 May 2023 by virtue of a Temporary Exemption Notice made by the London Borough of Haringey. That date is more than 12 months before the date on which the application was made to this Tribunal. The Applicant is therefore not entitled to apply for a rent repayment order and accordingly the application for a rent repayment order is refused.
Background
2. The application is for repayment of rent in respect of the period 19 September 2022 until 16 July 2023. However, by notice dated 3 May 2023 the relevant local authority, the London Borough of Haringey made a Temporary Exemption Notice under section 62(2) Housing Act 2004 in relation to 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the Property). The notice states:
“The council has decided, under section 62(2) of the Housing Act 2004, to grant a temporary exemption from the requirement to licence.
44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] shall be exempted from the need to be licensed under Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004 and shall come into force from 3 May 2023 and will end on 2 August 2023, which is three calendar months from the start date.”
3. The effect of this notice was that for three months from 3 May 2023 the Property was exempt from the licensing requirements. This therefore means that the last date an offence was committed was 2 May 2023.
3 4. The Applicant’s application for a rent repayment order was received by the Tribunal on 24 May 2024. Under section 41(2) of the 2016 Act, “A tenant may apply for a rent repayment order only if … the offence was committed in the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made”.
5. The Applicant asked the Tribunal to consider whether or not the Temporary Exemption Notice had been given on a false basis given that the Tenants had confirmed to the London Borough of Haringey that they were not going to vacate the Property on 20 June 2023. However, the Tribunal does not accept this argument. The Temporary Exemption Notice was made and remained in force. The Tribunal cannot go behind that notice.
6. The application is therefore out of time because the claim relates to an offence ending on 3 May 2023, and that date is more than 12 months before the date on which the application was made. The Applicant is therefore not entitled to apply for a rent repayment order and accordingly the application for a rent repayment order is refused.
Judge: Bernadette MacQueen
Date: 21 January 2025
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-Tier at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
3. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request to an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (ie give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Prohibition Order Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Financial Penalties for Failing to License Properties
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Allowed to Bypass Consultation Requirements for Electricity and Ga…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Service Charge Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants Win Rent Repayment Orders for Landlord's Unlicensed HMO Operation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Financial Penalty Reduced in Housing Offence Appeal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants Win Rent Repayment Order for Unlicensed HMO
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Request for Rent Repayment Order Rejected by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Application for Rent Repayment Order Dismissed
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Right to Buy Denied Due to Property Suitability for Elderly
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The alleged offense occurred more than 12 months before the application.
- The court considers the timing of the offense relative to the application date.
- The court upholds the requirement for timely applications.
- The court does not allow rent repayment orders for offenses outside the statute of limitations.
- The court enforces strict adherence to the time frame for filing rent repayment orders.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant's application for a rent repayment order was denied because it was submitted too late.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the application was out of time because the alleged offence occurred more than 12 months ago.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 41(2) and 62(2) of the Housing Act 2004 and 2016 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the application was made more than 12 months after the alleged offence.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their application for a rent repayment order is made within 12 months of the alleged offence.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The Temporary Exemption Notice issued by the local authority was crucial in determining the timing of the alleged offence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal proceedings.
