Tenant Wins Return of Holding Deposit Under Tenant Fees Act 2019
📌 In brief
A tenant successfully recovered a holding deposit of £600 from the landlord's agent because no tenancy agreement was entered into despite passing the necessary checks. The decision was made by Judge Tagliavini in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to the return of a holding deposit if a tenancy agreement is not entered into within the deadline set by the Act.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal ordered the repayment of a holding deposit under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal ordered the repayment of a holding deposit of £600 to the tenant under the Tenant Fees Act 2019, as no tenancy agreement was entered into despite successful referencing and the offer of a contract. Judge Tagliavini presided over the case in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BG/HTC/2025/0606 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : I/P Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] of [NAME] : For recovery of all or part of a prohibited payment or holding deposit: Tenant Fees Act 2019 Tribunal member : Judge Tagliavini Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 6 August 2025
DECISION
2
The tribunal’s summary decision
(1) The respondent is required to pay to the applicant the sum of £600
representing the tenancy deposit paid in respect of the property at [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].
(2) The sum of £600 is to paid no later than 7 days of this decision being
sent to the parties.
_____________________________________________________
The [NAME]
1. This is an [NAME] for an order for the recovery of a holding deposit
paid in respect of a tenancy of [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the flat’) pursuant to section 15 of the
Tenant Fees Act 2019.
The background
2. The applicant asserts in January 2025 the respondent received
payment of £600 as a holding deposit representing 1 month’s rent for
the [NAME] of a the subject flat. Although the [NAME]
passed the necessary referencing checks the tenancy was not entered
into due to the actions of the landlord and/or the respondent his agent.
The respondent subsequently informed the [NAME] the
deposit would be returned but has failed to do so.
The hearing
3. Neither party requested an oral hearing and the [NAME] was
determined on the documents provided by the applicant only as the
respondent failed to comply with the tribunal’s Directions dated 30 May
2025 and did not provide or rely upon any response or evidence
objecting to the [NAME].
The tribunal’s decision and reasons
4. The tribunal determines the applicant is entitled to the return of the
£600 paid as a holding deposit for the tenancy of the subject flat.
5. In reaching its decision the tribunal had regard to the [NAME] provisions
of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 which states at Schedule 2:
(1)This Schedule applies where a holding deposit is paid to a
landlord or [NAME] agent in respect of a proposed tenancy of
housing in England.
3
2(1)In this Schedule “the deadline for agreement” means the
fifteenth day of the period beginning with the day on which the
landlord or [NAME] agent receives the holding deposit.
(2)But the landlord or the [NAME] agent may agree with the
tenant in writing that a different day is to be the deadline for
agreement for the purposes of this Schedule.
Requirement to repay holding deposit
3Subject as follows, the person who received the holding deposit
must repay it if—
(a)the landlord and the tenant enter into a tenancy agreement
relating to the housing,
(b)the landlord decides before the deadline for agreement not to
enter into a tenancy agreement relating to the housing, or
(c)the landlord and the tenant fail to enter into a tenancy
agreement relating to the housing before the deadline for
agreement.
4If paragraph 3 applies, the deposit must be repaid within
the period of 7 days beginning with—
(a)where paragraph 3(a) applies, the date of the tenancy
agreement,
(b)where paragraph 3(b) applies, the date on which the landlord
decides not to enter into the tenancy agreement, or
(c)where paragraph 3(c) applies, the deadline for agreement.
6. Section 15 of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 makes provision for the recovery
of the holding deposit and states:
(2)Subsection (3) also applies where—
(a)a landlord or [NAME] agent breaches Schedule 2 in relation to
a holding deposit paid by a [NAME], and
(b)all or part of the holding deposit has not been repaid to [NAME].
(3)[NAME] may make an [NAME] to the First-tier
Tribunal for the recovery from the landlord or [NAME] agent of—
(a)if none of the prohibited payment or holding deposit has been
repaid to [NAME], the amount of the prohibited
payment or holding deposit;
…
(9)On an [NAME] under subsection (3) or (5), the First-tier
Tribunal may order the landlord or the [NAME] agent to pay all
or any part of the amount or (as the case may be) the aggregate
amount referred to in that subsection to [NAME]
within the period specified in the order.
4
(10)A period specified under subsection (9) must be a period of
at least 7 days but not more than 14 days beginning with the day
after that on which the order is made.
(11)An order of the First-tier Tribunal under this section is
enforceable by order of the county court as if the amount payable
under the order were payable under an order of that court.
7. It appears from the [NAME] that the [NAME] of the
subject flat were the applicant and [APPELLANT], although this has not
been expressly stated by the applicant. The tribunal is satisfied the
respondent was acting as the [NAME] agent of the landlord and by an
email dated 25 January 2025 informed [RESPONDENT] that a £600
deposit was required to be paid to the respondent in order to secure the
flat pending referencing. On 25 January 2025, the deposit was paid and
the respondent subsequently received £600 as a holding deposit from
[APPELLANT] as evidenced by the documents provided by the applicant.
8. However no tenancy agreement was subsequently entered into despite
referencing having been successfully completed and the offer of a
contract made. The tribunal is satisfied the landlord failed to enter
into a tenancy agreement despite the [NAME] being willing
to do so. Consequently the holding deposit was required by the Tenant
Fees Act 2019 to be returned by the respondent who had received it on
behalf of the landlord.
9. In conclusion the tribunal orders the respondent to repay the holding
deposit of £600 to the applicant no later than 7 days of this decision
being sent to the parties.
Name: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 6 August 2025
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case.
5 The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-[NAME]-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Claimant's Request for Holding Deposit Return
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Fees Act 2019 Does Not Apply to Common Law Tenancy Agreements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Application for Holding Deposit Recovery Dismissed by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-Tier Tribunal Awards £25k Costs Against Claimants in Service Charge C…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Found Liable for Service Charges Under Lease Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Landlord to Repay Holding Deposit
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Refund for Prohibited Re-Letting Fee Under Tenant Fees Act 2019
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Holding Deposit Refund Under Tenant Fees Act 2019
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Unreasonable Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Holding Deposit Repayment Due to Lack of Timely Notice
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to the return of a holding deposit if a tenancy agreement is not entered into within the deadline set by the Act.
- The tenant is entitled to the repayment of a holding deposit if the landlord fails to provide a timely written notice explaining why the deposit will not be repaid.
- The tenant is entitled to the repayment of a holding deposit if the landlord fails to provide a written explanation within the relevant period.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant must take all reasonable steps to enter into a tenancy agreement before the deadline for agreement to be eligible for the return of a holding deposit.
- A tenant is not entitled to the protections provided by the Tenant Fees Act 2019 in a common law tenancy agreement.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant was entitled to recover a holding deposit of £600.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord's agent were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the tenant because the holding deposit was not returned despite the tenant passing all necessary checks.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the holding deposit should be returned as no tenancy agreement was entered into.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that their holding deposit is returned if a tenancy agreement is not entered into.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence showing that the tenant passed all necessary checks and that no tenancy agreement was entered into mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving property law.
