VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Appoints Manager for Victorian Building Converted into Five Flats

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal appointed a manager to oversee the management of a Victorian building converted into five flats, finding that the landlord had failed to comply with the RICS Code of Practice. The decision was made in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 22 October 2021.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to apply to the Tribunal for the appointment of a manager if the landlord fails to comply with the RICS Code of Practice.

Topics

management orderRICS Code of Practiceproperty management

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.24Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act OnClickListener 1993 s.87

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.24

The First-tier Tribunal can appoint a manager to oversee the management of premises if they find that the landlord has breached obligations related to the management of those premises or has failed to comply with a code of practice approved by the Secretary of State. Additionally, the Tribunal must also determine that it is just and convenient to make such an order considering all the circumstances.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal appointed a manager to oversee the management of a Victorian building converted into five flats.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal appointed a manager to oversee the management of a Victorian building converted into five flats, finding that the landlord had failed to comply with the RICS Code of Practice. The decision was made in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 22 October 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AW/LAM/2021/0011 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : V: CVP REMOTE Property : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants : [redacted] (2) [COUNSEL] : In person Respondents : [redacted] (2) [NAME] (3) [NAME] [NAME] (4) [NAME] : In person Type of [NAME] : Appointment of a manager Tribunal members : Judge N [NAME] T Sennett FCIEH Dates and venue of London Panel : 8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 22 October 2021

DECISION

2 Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote video hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V: CVP REMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in a digital bundle of 100 pages (including index) provided by the Applicants as well as the Applicants’ [NAME] and notice pursuant to section 22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, an official Land Registry copy of the freehold title, the proposed Manager’s schedule of charges and a statement, schedule of internal works and accounts relied upon by certain of the Respondents. The orders made are described below. Decisions of the Tribunal

(1) [NAME] [NAME] (Hons) [NAME] is appointed Manager of [NAME] in accordance with the terms of the Management Order below. (2) Of the Tribunal fees paid by the Applicants in the sum of £300, [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME] are each ordered to reimburse the Applicants the sum of £60 (leaving the Applicants to contribute £60 each). (3) The case management decisions made by the Tribunal are set out in the body of this decision.

The [NAME] 1. The Applicants seek an order under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (“the 1987 Act”) appointing [NAME] [APPELLANT] (Hons) [NAME] of [COMPANY] to manage 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“[NAME]”).

2. [NAME] is a Victorian building which has been converted into five flats. The Applicants, [NAME] and [NAME], are the long [NAME] of flats at [NAME]. The four Respondents, [NAME] [NAME] and [NAME] are the freehold owners of [NAME]. Accordingly, [APPELLANT] is both an Applicant and a Respondent.

3. The Tribunal has been informed that [RESPONDENT] and her two sons, [NAME] [NAME] and [NAME], are the joint [NAME] of one flat at [NAME] and that [NAME], [NAME] (also known as [NAME]); [NAME]; and [NAME] are the [NAME] of the remaining four flats.

3

4. Directions were given on 27 July 2021 2021 by Judge Tagliavini (“the Directions”) leading up to a final hearing which took place on 8 October 2021.

The hearing

5. A remote video hearing took place in this matter on 8 October 2021. All of the parties attended in person together with [NAME] [NAME], the proposed manager. [NAME] was at times represented by one of her sons with the Tribunal’s permission and, at other times, she spoke directly to the Tribunal. [NAME] [NAME] had to leave at approximately 12.30 pm. The other parties and the proposed manager attended for the duration of the hearing.

6. The Tribunal has identified that the issues to be determined in this appointment of manager [NAME] are as follows:

i. Whether a preliminary notice under section 22 of the 1987 Act has been served and, if not, whether service should be dispensed with;

ii. Whether there are grounds for appointing a manager;

iii. Whether it is just and convenient to appoint a manager;

iv. Whether the proposed manager is a suitable appointee; and

v. The terms of any management order.

7. At the commencement of the hearing, the Respondents who oppose the [NAME] of a management order sought to rely upon documents which had not been served in accordance with the Tribunal’s Directions (“the additional documents”). They explained that they had been waiting for a response to correspondence sent to the Tribunal concerning a proposed postponement of the hearing and other matters, and that they are unfamiliar with Tribunal proceedings.

8. The Tribunal determined that it would exercise its discretion to extend time under rule 6(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 to enable the late documents to be admitted in evidence. This was on the basis that if, during the course of the hearing it became apparent that the Applicants would be prejudiced by virtue of having insufficient time to respond, the Tribunal would not place any weight on the evidence in question.

4

The Tribunal’s determinations

Service of the preliminary notice

9. Section 22 of the 1987 Act includes provision that:

22.— Preliminary notice by tenant.

(1) Before an [NAME] for an order under section 24 is made in respect of any premises to which this Part applies by a tenant of a flat contained in those premises, a notice under this section must (subject to subsection (3)) be served by the tenant on— (i) the landlord, …

10. At the commencement of the hearing, it was asserted that [NAME] [NAME] and [NAME] may be landlords. The Tribunal noted that the preliminary notice had not been served on them and invited the Mrs [NAME] to produce an official Land Registry copy of the freehold title. This established that [NAME] [NAME] and [NAME] are not landlords and that the preliminary notice had been correctly served.

Whether there are grounds for appointing a manager 11. Section 21(1) of the 1987 Act provides:

21.— Tenant's right to apply to court for appointment of manager.

(1) The tenant of a flat contained in any premises to which this Part applies may, subject to the following provisions of this Part, apply to the appropriate tribunal for an order under section 24 appointing a manager to act in relation to those premises.

12. Section 24(2) of the 1987 Act includes provision that:

24.— Appointment of manager by a tribunal. ... (2) The appropriate tribunal may only make an order under this section in the following circumstances, namely— … (ac) where the tribunal is satisfied— (i) that any relevant person has failed to comply with any relevant provision of a code of practice approved by the Secretary of State under section 87 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (codes of management practice), and (ii) that it is just and convenient to make the order in all the circumstances of the case; or

5 (b) where the tribunal is satisfied that other circumstances exist which make it just and convenient for the order to be made.

13. In the notice served pursuant to section 22 of the 1987 Act, the Applicants make numerous allegations including that the Respondents are in breach of the RICS Code of Practice (“the RICS Code”) which is approved by the Secretary of State under section 87 under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

14. The Respondents who oppose this [NAME] state that “the basics have been covered” and they have clearly been attempting to do what they can. However, they accept that they have not been managing [NAME] in accordance with the RICS Code.

15. For example, with the exception of a period of approximately one year during which managing agents were appointed, no fire risk assessments have been carried out for over 10 years and the statutory consultation process pursuant to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 has not been complied with when undertaking major works. The Respondents who oppose this [NAME] explained that they are unfamiliar with the RICS Code.

16. We are satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the RICS code has not been complied with and that grounds for appointing a manager therefore exist. Whether it is just and convenient to appoint a manager 17. The Respondents who oppose this [NAME] were not at the time of the hearing opposed to the appointment of a managing agent to manage [NAME]. They did not, however, want the Tribunal to appoint a manager. They were still hopeful that the parties would be able to instructed a managing agent by agreement and [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] explained that they wished to retain the freedom to choose whether to continue with or to dis-instruct a managing agent. [NAME] [NAME] expressed the hope that all parties would be willing to compromise.

18. The Tribunal heard evidence that the parties had difficulty in agreeing the instructions to be given to managing agents during the period when managing agents were in fact instructed. It is clear to the Tribunal that relations between the parties to these proceedings have broken down and that areas of dispute, for example concerning the payment of electricity bills, have proved impossible to amicably resolve. It is common ground that no comprehensive internal redecoration of the common areas has been carried out for around 18 years.

19. We find that it is unlikely on the balance of probabilities that, in the absence of an order appointing a manager, the parties will reach an agreement within a reasonable period of time concerning who to appoint as managing agents; concerning the instructions to be given to any

6 proposed managing agents; and concerning the period of time for which any proposed managing agents should remain instructed.

20. In our view, it is important that a property manager remains in place for a sufficient long period of time to enable the outstanding major works to be completed without putting undue financial strain on the [NAME].

21. Having regard to all of the matters set out above, the Tribunal finds that it is just and convenient to make a Management Order.

Whether the proposed manager is a suitable appointee

22. [NAME] [NAME] was carefully questioned by the Tribunal and by the parties. He stressed that he would seek to act independently and impartially and that, if appointed Manager, his overriding duty will be to the Tribunal and not any party to these proceedings. He proposed a 5 year appointment in order that the cost of the proposed major works can be spread over a number of years.

23. The Tribunal is satisfied that [NAME] [NAME] has suitable qualifications and relevant experience; that he understands what will be involved in managing [NAME]; and that he has the skills and resources to take on the role of Manager.

24. In all the circumstances, the Tribunal is satisfied that [NAME] [NAME] is a suitable appointee.

The terms of the management order

25. The terms of the Management Order set out below were considered line by line by [NAME] [NAME] together with the Tribunal and the parties. [NAME] [NAME] confirmed to the Tribunal that he would be happy to manage [NAME] in accordance with these terms.

26. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of a specimen lease. The leases of the five flats at [NAME] do not contain comprehensive service charge provisions and all parties agree that the wording of the leases is unsatisfactory. The Tribunal cannot give advice and the parties should seek independent legal advice concerning any action which may be open to them to remedy this situation.

27. Clause 3(3) of the specimen lease provides (emphasis supplied):

“3. THE Lessee with the intent to bind so far as may be the Flat and all persons who shall for the time being be the owner of any estate or interest in or the occupier of the Flat (but save as hereinafter provided not so as to be personally liable under this clause after the Lessee shall have parted with all the Lessee’s estate and interest in the Flat) hereby

7 jointly and severally covenants with the Landlords and as separate covenants with each of the [NAME] of any other Flat forming part of the building (all of whom the landlords and the said [NAME] hereinafter collectively called “the Covenantees”) for the benefit and protection of [NAME] respectively vested in the Covenantees and each and every part thereof that the lessee will from time to time and at all times hereafter:- … (4) Contribute and pay to such one or more of the Covenantees as shall incur the costs and expenses hereinafter mentioned nineteen per centum of the costs and expenses incurred in keeping in substantial order and condition pursuant to the provisions in that behalf contained or to be contained in the Leases of the other flats forming part of the building or in the hereinbefore recited Deed of Covenant such of the following parts of the building as do not form part of the Flat that is to say all roofs roof rafters chimney stacks gutters rain water pipes foundations boundaries and fences and the forecourt to the said property and such of the following as are enjoyed or used in connection with two or more of the flats forming part of the building namely gas and water pipes drains and electric cables and wires stairs and staircases entrance passages and landings…”

28. [NAME] [NAME] will be entitled to recover, as a service charge, the relevant lease percentage of any sums which each lessee would be liable to pay to the Covenantees in accordance with clause 3 of the lease (“the Clause 3 Charges”).

29. [NAME] [NAME] basic management fees are £180+ VAT per unit, increasing in line with RPI. The Tribunal is not satisfied that there is any provision in the leases requiring the [NAME] to pay managing agents’ fees. In the absence of any such provision, we are not satisfied that the management fees for each unit should be added together and then paid in accordance with the lease percentages. The time spent by the Manager in dealing with queries from [NAME] will not necessarily be referrable to the size of each flat. In the circumstances of this case, we find that the basic management fee for each flat should be paid by the lessee of each flat.

Refund of fees

30. At the end of the hearing, Mrs [NAME] applied for an order under section 13(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 requiring the Respondents to reimburse the Tribunal fees paid by the Applicants. Following some discussion, it became apparent that her proposal was that, of the £300 paid in respect of Tribunal fees, [NAME] [NAME] and each of the Respondents, including Mrs [NAME], should pay £60 each.

31. The Applicants have been successful in their [NAME] and all parties are likely to benefit from having [NAME] professionally managed. The Tribunal finds that it is fair and just to make an order in the terms

8 proposed. Accordingly, of the Tribunal fees paid by the Applicants in the sum of £300, [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME] are each ordered to reimburse the Applicants the sum of £60 (leaving the Applicants to contribute £60 each).

MANAGEMENT ORDER

1. In accordance with section 24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (“the Act”) [NAME] [APPELLANT] (Hons) [NAME] is appointed as Manager of 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] ("[NAME]’).

2. The appointment shall start on date 5 November 2021 (“the start date”) and shall end on 4 November 2026 (“the end date”).

3. The Manager shall manage [NAME] in accordance with the duties of a manager set out in the Service Charge Residential Management Code, 3rd Edition (“the RICS Code”) or such other replacement code published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and approved by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 87 Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

4. The Manager must perform his duties under this Order independently, and has an overriding duty to this Tribunal.

5. The Manager shall operate a complaints procedure in accordance with, or substantially similar to, the requirements of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.

6. During the period of the appointment the Manager must hold appropriate professional indemnity insurance cover of at least £1,000,000.

7. Within 14 days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall transfer to the Manager:

(a) all accounts, books and records relating to [NAME] including a complete record of all unpaid service charges; and

(b) all funds relating to [NAME] including uncommitted service charges and any monies standing to the credit of any reserve or sinking fund.

8. The Manager shall register this Order against the registered title to [NAME] in accordance with section 24(8) of the Act. 9. The Manager is entitled to apply to the Tribunal for further directions. 10. The Manager or any other interested person may apply to vary or discharge this Order pursuant to the provisions of section 24(9) of the Act.

9 11. [NAME] to extend or renew this Order should be made at least 3 months before the end date and must include a report of the [NAME] during the period of the appointment to the date of the [NAME]. 12. The Manager is granted the following functions and owes the following duties relating to the [NAME].

Functions and Duties

Insurance 1. The Manager must maintain appropriate building insurance for [NAME] and ensure that the Manager’s interest is noted on the insurance policy. Ground Rent and Service charge 2. The Manager shall not collect the ground rents, if any, payable under the residential leases.

3. The Manager shall collect all Clause 3 Charges (defined above) and insurance premium contributions payable under the residential leases, in accordance with the terms and mechanisms in the leases (save that the arbitration clauses shall not apply, the [NAME] having the protection of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985), and shall prepare annual service charge budget and accounts, and distribute them to [NAME].

4. To ensure that the Manager has adequate funds to manage [NAME] the Manager may 14 days from the date of this Order collect a total sum of £4,000 from the [NAME]. The [NAME] shall contribute to this sum in accordance with their lease percentages.

5. Within 14 days of receiving both copies of the relevant past electricity bills and a demand from the Manager, [NAME] shall pay the Manager her share of these past electricity bills.

6. All monies received by [NAME] in respect of [NAME] shall be held in a designated trust account.

7. The Manager has the right to enforce payment of the service charge and may instruct solicitors to recover unpaid service charges and any other monies due in respect of [NAME], including where liability arises prior to his appointment. Contracts and Litigation 8. Rights and liabilities arising under contracts to which the Manager is not a party but which are relevant to the [NAME] are to become rights and liabilities of the Manager;

9. The rights and liabilities of the parties under any contract of insurance for [NAME] or for the provision of goods or services to [NAME] shall become the rights and liabilities of [NAME] from the start date.

10 10. The Manager may place, supervise and administer contracts and check demands for payment of goods, services and equipment supplied for the benefit of [NAME]. 11. The Manager may prosecute or defend Court or Tribunal proceedings relating to the [NAME] (whether contractual or tortious) and may continue to prosecute or defend proceedings commenced during the appointment after the end date.

Repairs and maintenance 12. The Manager shall, subject to receiving sufficient prior funds, carry out all required repair and maintenance work relating to [NAME], having regard to the covenants in the residential leases, including instructing contractors to attend and rectify problems, and is entitled to recover the cost of doing so as service charge payable under the residential leases.

13. The Manager shall by 10 December 2021 draw up a planned maintenance programme for the period of the appointment allowing for the periodic re-decoration and repair of the exterior and interior common parts of [NAME] and shall send a copy to every lessee and to the respondents. Licences to assign, approvals and pre-contract enquiries

14. The Manager shall be responsible for carrying out those functions in residential leases with regard to approvals and permissions, including those for sublettings, assignments, alterations and improvements, that the lease provides should be carried out by the Respondents.

15. The Manager shall be responsible for responding to pre-contract enquiries regarding the sale of a residential flat. Remuneration 16. The residential [NAME] are responsible for payment of the Managers’ fees which are payable under the provisions of this Order.

17. The lessee(s) of each flat at [NAME] shall pay a management fee of £180+VAT per annum for the first year of the manager’s appointment quarterly in advance on or before 5 November 2021, 5 February 2022, 5 May 2022, 5 August 2022. This fee is payable per flat for performing the duties set out in paragraph 3.4 of the RICS Code (so far as applicable) and any other duties specified by [NAME] [NAME] as being within his basic management fee. In subsequent years of the Manager’s appointment, the fee will increase in line with RPI but shall remain payable quarterly in advance on the same dates of the year.

18. The basic management fee includes the following: • Produce an annual service charge budget • Produce a reserve fund forecast (updated annually) • Produce service specifications and tender services regularly

11 • Collect service charge payments • Administer all credit control & debt collection • Maintain a designated client bank account for the development • Review, authorisation and payment of all contractor and supplier invoices • Produce monthly financial reports detailing income, expenditure and credit control issues • Undertake regular site inspections and issue the client with a monthly inspection report. • Attend regular client meetings • Arrange insurances • Attend your Annual General Meeting (if any) • Manage contractors working on site • Manage Health & Safety / Fire Risk Assessments • Ensure compliance with legislation • Provide an online client portal

19. The [NAME] will also be responsible for paying any of the following additional fees incurred following the date of this order:

Item

£ Exc. VAT £ Inc. VAT Pre-Contract Enquiries - 7 day

350

420 Pre-Contract Enquiries - 24 Hour 500

600 Notice of Transfer

100

120 Deed of Covenant

100

120 Arrears Letter 1

75

90 Letter Before Action

125

150 Breach of Covenant Referral Fee 165

198 [NAME] 8%

8% Section 20 Admin Fee

350

420 Consent Letter

125

150 Tribunal / Court Attendance (Per Hour) 150

180

Reporting

20. By no later than one year from the date of this order, the Manager shall prepare and submit a brief written report for the Tribunal on the

12 progress of the [NAME] up to that date, providing a copy to the [NAME] of [NAME] and the Respondents at the same time.

End of Appointment 21. Within 28 days of the conclusion of the Management Order, the Manager shall prepare and submit a brief written report for the Tribunal, on the progress and outcome of the [NAME] up to that date, to include final closing accounts.

22. The Manager shall also serve copies of the report and accounts on the lessor and [NAME], who may raise queries on them within 14 days. The Manager shall answer such queries within a further 14 days.

23. Thereafter, the Manager shall reimburse any unexpended monies to the paying parties or, if it be the case, to any new Tribunal-appointed manager, or, in the case of dispute, as decided by the Tribunal upon [NAME] by any interested party.

Disputes

24. In the event of a dispute regarding the payability of a service charge a lessee, or the Manager, is entitled to pursue an [NAME] to this Tribunal under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

25. In the event of a dispute regarding the payability of any sum payable under this Order, rather than under a residential lease (including as to the remuneration payable to the Manager and litigation costs incurred by the Manager), a lessee, or the Manager, may apply to the Tribunal seeking a determination as to whether the sum in dispute is payable and, if so, in what amount.

Name: Judge N Hawkes Date: 22 October 2021

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.

13 The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord fails to comply with the RICS Code of Practice.
  • The tenant requests the appointment of a manager due to the landlord's failure to manage effectively.
  • The RTM company complies with the statutory requirements under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act.
  • Service charges are reasonable and supported by evidence within 18 months of being incurred.
  • The tribunal may appoint a manager if the property requires significant maintenance and the landlord is in breach of their obligations.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant tries to dictate the specific works carried out under the lease obligations.
  • A tenant is liable for service charges for necessary repairs to their property.
  • A tenant attempts to withhold payment of service charges without a valid certificate stating the amount.
  • A tenant challenges the reasonableness of service charges for major works under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal appointed a manager to oversee the management of a Victorian building converted into five flats.

Who was involved?

Tenants of the building and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to appoint a manager because the landlord had failed to comply with the RICS Code of Practice.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 and the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the landlord had failed to comply with the RICS Code of Practice.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to apply to the Tribunal for the appointment of a manager if their landlord fails to comply with the RICS Code of Practice.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Documents such as the proposed manager's schedule of charges and a statement, schedule of internal works and accounts were relied upon.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.