VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Caps Tenant's Fair Rent at £238 Weekly

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for the tenant but capped it at £238 weekly due to statutory limits. This means the tenant cannot pay more than this amount unless there are changes in the law or circumstances.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent, subject to statutory caps.

Topics

fair rentcapping provisionsmaximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent but capped it under the Maximum Fair Rents Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £288 weekly for the tenant but capped it at £238 weekly under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AE/F77/2024/0262

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge I [NAME] [NAME] (EST MAN) [COMPANY]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £238.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 22 October 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £288.00 per week.

Chairman Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of decision 22 October 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 388.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 340.0

X 388.6 Minus Y 340.0 = (A) 48.6

(A) 48.6 Divided by Y 340.0 = (B) 0.1429411

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1929411

Last registered rent* 199.50 Multiplied by (C) = 237.99 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 238.00

Variable service charge YxxES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £238.00 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’ s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference:

TR/LON/00AE/F77/2024/0262

Property:

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant: `

[APPELLANT]

Landlord:

[COMPANY] of Objection:

July 2024

Type of Application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal:

Judge I [NAME]

[NAME] (EST MAN) FRICS

Date of Extended Reasons

: 22 October 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £238 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 October 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT EXTENDED REASONS

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 Background 1. Following an objection from the tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the documentary evidence only.

Evidence 3. No written submissions were received from either party.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area of Brent, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £450 per week.

5. From this level of rent we have made global adjustments in relation to:

For the the dated kitchen and bathroom, tenant’s floor coverings, curtains, white goods, the tenant’s internal decoration obligation under the terms of the tenancy.

6. After deducting the amount for services, the Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

7. The full valuation is shown below:

per week Market Rent

£450

Less

Deductions above

)

) 20%

£90 )

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£72

£288

8. The Tribunal determines a fair rent of £288 per week.

Decision 9. However, the rent is capped under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 at £238 per week, as it is above MFR.

Tribunal Judge: [NAME]: 22 October 2024

3 APPEAL PROVISIONS

These extended reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. Any application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal considering the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The fair rent reflects the market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
  • The fair rent is adjusted for the condition of the property and service charges, subject to the maximum fair rent cap under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition and market comparables, adjusted for any relevant differences.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The fair rent does not exceed the statutory maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent reflects the market conditions and the state of repair of the property but was dismissed due to exceeding the statutory cap.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent but capped it at £238 weekly.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the statutory cap on the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant as the rent was capped.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also face a cap on their fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the latest RPI figures and the previous registered rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rents.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.