Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Water Ingress
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to carry out urgent repairs without consulting tenants. The repairs were needed to fix water leakage issues in a multi-flat building.
⚖️ Legal holding
An applicant may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements under urgent circumstances.
📖 What the law says
The tribunal can grant an exemption from consultation requirements if it finds it reasonable to do so. Consultation requirements refer to obligations set by regulations for landlords to consult tenants before making changes or entering into long-term agreements.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for the applicant to carry out urgent repairs to a building suffering from water ingress. The repairs were deemed necessary to address immediate safety concerns.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BG/LDC/2022/0199 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : P: PAPERREMOTE Property : 40 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : D&[COUNSEL] [NAME] (Property Manager) Respondents : [redacted] Representative : N/A Type of [NAME] : For the dispensation of consultation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal members : Judge Tagliavini Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 13 February 2023
DECISION
2
Summary decision of the tribunal (1) The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the 1985 Act for the carrying out of the works as set out in the quote of; (i) [COMPANY]. date 17 October 2022 in the sum of £9,732.66 (plus VAT) and the invoice of (ii) [COMPANY] dated 22 October 2022 in the sum of £2,220.00 (including VAT). _________________________________________________ The [NAME]
1. The Applicant seeks a determination pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’ due to urgent works being required to remedy water ingress into the building situate at 40 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the Property’) and include works to the scupper chute/gulley and downpipe.
2. The Property comprises four flats in a mid-terrace conversion on the basement, ground, first and second floors. The hearing 3. The applicants provided two bundles of 26 and 32 pages respectively which included a copy of the relevant lease together with the [NAME] and details of the works required to the Property. None of the respondents provided any objection or response to the [NAME] although the tribunal was satisfied they had been notified of the applicant’s request for dispensation as set out in the applicant’s email of confirmation dated 14 December 2022.
4. Consequently, the tribunal reached its determination by solely relying on the documents provided by the applicant. The tribunal’s decision and reasons 5. The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the 1985 Act for the carrying out of the works as set out in the quote of; (i) [COMPANY]. date 17 October 2022 in the sum of £9,732.66 (plus VAT) and the invoice of (ii) [COMPANY] dated 22 October 2022 in the sum of £2,220.00 (including VAT).
3 6. The tribunal finds that the applicant’s intention to carry out these works was notified to the lessees in writing or around 4 November 2022 as well having this [NAME] dated 14 October 2022 being brough to their attention. In the absence of any objections to this [NAME] from any of the lessees, the urgent nature of the works and the absence of any prejudice likely to be caused to the lessees by the [NAME], the tribunal considers it reasonable to grant the dispensation sought; [COMPANY] v [NAME] & Others [2013] UKSC 14.
7. In conclusion, the tribunal grants the dispensation sought.
Name: Judge Tagliavini Date:
13 February 2023
Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Found in Breach of Multiple Lease Covenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation Without Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Claimant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Dry Rot
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Ground Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Listed Farmhouse
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works or actions are deemed urgent and necessary.
- The applicant complies with the relevant sections of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- The property's condition and market comparables support the claimant's request.
- The claimant adheres to the prescribed procedures under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
- The claimant is entitled to a fair rent or rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tribunal decides not to exercise its discretion to order reimbursement of fees.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal allowed the landlord to carry out urgent repairs without consulting the tenants.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants of a multi-flat building were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the landlord could proceed with the repairs because the situation was urgent and there was no likely prejudice to the tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of the repairs and the lack of any likely prejudice to the tenants were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get permission to carry out urgent repairs without consulting tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Quotes and invoices for the repair work were presented as evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
