Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction Over Rent Increase Application Due to Lack of Valid Notice
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that it could not decide on a rent increase a person because the landlord failed to provide a proper notice as required by law. The decision was made by Tribunal Judge Brandler on 2nd July 2019.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord must serve a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988 before the tribunal can determine a rent increase a person.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice in a prescribed form to propose an increase in rent, which must specify a new period of the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served.
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal lacks jurisdiction due to the landlord's failure to serve a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to determine a rent increase application due to the landlord's failure to serve a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision was made by Tribunal Judge Brandler on 2nd July 2019.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2019/0068 Property : 90 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : - Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Tribunal Judge [NAME] and venue of hearing : 28th June 2019 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 2nd July 2019
DECISION
2
Decision of the tribunal The tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this [NAME] for the reasons stated below. The [NAME]
1. On 13th May 2019 the Tribunal received an [NAME] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The landlord’s notice of rent increase was not included with the [NAME].
2. By a letter from the London Residential First-tier Tribunal dated 22nd May 2019, the deficiency in the [NAME] was brought to the applicant’s attention.
3. In response, on 30th May 2019 the applicant’s letter confirmed that the only notification he had received from the respondent was in the body of an email dated 1st May 2019.
4. The applicant requested an oral hearing.
5. The respondents played no part in these proceedings, Mr [NAME] contacting the Tribunal only on 27th June 2019 to say that he would not be attending the hearing. Background 6. The applicant has been a tenant at [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“The Property”) since 2005. The applicant had an arrangement with the previous landlord to carry out management duties in the landlords absence, and the applicant benefited by receiving a reduction in rent charged. In March 2015 the respondents purchased the property.
7. Since purchasing the property, the parties have agreed two further fixed term tenancy contracts. Upon the expiry of the last fixed term, in or around the end of April 2019, the respondent offered the applicant a new fixed term tenancy agreement for 6 months at an increase in rent which the applicant has refused. The applicant at that stage referred the matter to the Tribunal on the basis that his tenancy had become a statutory periodic tenancy.
8. The respondent has not served a s.13 Notice of Increase of rent on the applicant.
3
Hearing 9. Mr [APPELLANT], the applicant, appeared in person. The respondents took no part in these proceedings. The Law 10. S. 13 of the Housing Act 1988 sets out the requirements when increasing rent under an assured periodic tenancy. 11. S. 14 of the Housing Act 1988 requires a s.13 notice to have been served before the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the rent. Reasons for the decision:
12. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider the applicant’s appeal because the respondent has not served a s.13 notice of increase of rent.
D. Brandler
Name: Tribunal Judge Brandler Date: 2nd July 2019
4
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
5
THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and
6 (b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect. ] (4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
7 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. [ (3A) In [NAME] a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before [NAME] their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed
8 as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Application Due to Defective Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Defective Notice of Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Service Charge Challenge Due to Uncontested Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Defective Notice Proposing New Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Cannot Determine Market Rent After Withdrawn Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Application to Vary Lease Terms
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Wasted Costs Claim Rejected by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Market Rent Claim Due to Tenancy Clause
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant successfully challenged a defective notice of rent increase.
- The tribunal partially allowed the tenant's entitlement to a rent determination reflecting the property's condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord failed to serve a valid notice under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The landlord did not specify a new period of the tenancy for the proposed rent increase.
- The tenant's challenge was dismissed when the landlord withdrew the rent increase notice.
- The tenant was not entitled to challenge a service charge increase if the rent was not contested.
- The tenant was not entitled to have the market rent determined by the tribunal if the tenancy agreement specified a different method for rent increases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal decided it lacked jurisdiction to determine the rent increase application.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided it lacked jurisdiction because the landlord did not serve a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the landlord did not serve a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that the landlord serves a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988 before bringing an application to the tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The lack of a valid notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988 was the critical piece of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
