VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £115/Week Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Newcastle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £115 per week for a tenant's property in Newcastle upon Tyne, ensuring it stays below the maximum allowed rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment under the Rent Act 1977, which was applied to determine a fair rent of £115.00 per week.

Topics

fair rentmaximum fair rentrent acts

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £115.00 per week for an assured tenancy, applying the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £115 per week for a property in Newcastle upon Tyne, setting it below the maximum fair rent limit of £120.50 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/F77/2020/0060

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

Mr ID Jefferson FRICS Mrs [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £115.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 16 February 2021

3. The amount for services is not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £120.50 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.

Tribunal Judge Mr ID Jefferson Date of decision 16 February 2021

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 295.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 278.1

X 295.4 Minus Y 278.1 = (A) 17.3

(A) 17.3 Divided by Y 278.1 = (B) 0.0622

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999:NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1122

Last registered rent* 108.00 Multiplied by (C) = 120.12 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 120.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services N/A

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £120.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Retail Price Index changes.
  • The tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tenant's entitlement includes consideration of relevant formulas under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their fair rent capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The maximum fair rent for a property is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 without mentioning the tenant's entitlement.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £115.00 per week for an assured tenancy in Gosforth, Newcastle.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about setting a fair rent for an assured tenancy in Gosforth, Newcastle.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the fair rent at £115.00 per week, applying the Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 to determine the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the fair rent at £115.00 per week.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent assessment under the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.