VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £16,820.50 Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and making necessary adjustments. The rent was set at £16,820.50 per annum.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal after considering comparable evidence and adjustments.

Topics

fair rent determinationcomparable evidence

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and making necessary adjustments.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and making necessary adjustments. The rent was set at £16,820.50 per annum.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: TR/LON/00AW/F77/2023/0158

Property : [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [COMPANY] (South West)

Date of Objection : 5 July 2023

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: [NAME] Valuer 079475

Date of Summary

Reasons

: 30 August 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £16280.50 per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 30 August 2023, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of £36,000 per annum. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect any tenant improvements, disrepair and obsolescence at the property. Details of the adjustments made are shown in the valuation table below.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £16,820.50 per calendar annum.

3

Decision 8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £21,600 per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £16,800.50 per annum. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £16,800.50 per annum is to be registered as the fair rent on this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 30 August 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant's entitlement to a fair rent is based on the Retail Price Index and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The Tribunal determines the fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent is adjusted based on comparable evidence and specific circumstances like improvements and disrepair.
  • The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The entitlement includes consideration of market conditions within legal limits.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The case outcome was marked as "Other," indicating a different result or exception not aligned with the typical allowed pattern.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and making necessary adjustments.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and made necessary adjustments to determine a fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence used to determine the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may benefit from having their rent determined by a tribunal based on comparable evidence.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the valuation table were important in determining the fair rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there is a point of law that the First-tier Tribunal got wrong.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.