Tribunal Sets £510/Month Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Liverpool

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BY/F77/2019/0021

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 77 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £ 510.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10 April 2019

3. The amount for services is 0.00 Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

0.00 Per

not applicable

5. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

6. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

7. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the below the maximum fair rent of £545.50 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.

[ADDRESS] of decision 10 April 2019

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 285

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 269.30

X 285 Minus Y 269.30 = (A) 15.70

(A) 15.70 Divided by Y 269.30 = (B) 0.0583

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1083

Last registered rent* 492 Multiplied by (C) = 545.28 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 545.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £ 545.50 Per calendar month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : MAN/00BY/F77/2019/0021

[NAME] : 77 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord : [COMPANY]

Tenant : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a fair rent under Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : [ADDRESS] (chairman) and [NAME] and venue of hearing

: Determination on the papers following an inspection of the [NAME] on 10 April 2019

Date of Decision : 10 April 2019

REASONS FOR DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

2

DECISION A fair rent of £510 00 per calendar month was determined by the Tribunal on 10 April 2019 with effect from the same date

REASONS Preliminary 1. On 7 December 2018, an application for registration of a fair rent for [ADDRESS] (“the [NAME]”) was received by the Rent Officer from [COMPANY] (“the Agent”) on behalf of [NAME] ([RESPONDENT] (“the Landlord”). The [NAME] is tenanted by [APPELLANT] (“the Tenant”). There is no service charge.

2. A rent of £518.00 per calendar month was determined by the Rent Officer on 21 January 2019 with effect from 6 March 2019.

3. On 18 February 2019, the Agent objected to the registered fair rent and requested the Rent Officer to refer the matter to the Tribunal. Inspection 4. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] internally and externally on 10 April 2019. The [NAME] is a semi-detached house comprising two ground floor living rooms and a kitchen and three bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor, with gardens front and rear. There is PVC double-glazing but no central heating. The letting is unfurnished.

5. The Tribunal noted the following items of landlord’s disrepair: the external drains at the front of the [NAME], and damp on the bedroom windows, front and rear. Necessary improvements consist of the installation of a central heating throughout and updating the roof. Tenant’s improvements consist of new fires and surrounds, kitchen units, garage, shed, garden fencing and ceiling repairs.

3

Evidence 6. The Tribunal received written representations from the Agent which provided details as to the location of the [NAME], that they considered the Landlord to be responsible but recognised that the [NAME] was not to modern day standards. Also included were details of three other properties, all three-bedroom semi-detached houses in Childwall, available for letting together with the asking rents: at [ADDRESS], at £895.00 pcm, [ADDRESS] at £850.00 pcm, and [NAME] at £795.00 pcm. Written representations were received from the Tenant by a letter dated 6 March, commenting on the comparables, pointing out that they had central heating, and detailing works of improvement that had been carried out, and the need for a new roof. Neither party requested a hearing when oral representations could have been made. The Tribunal therefore re-convened following the inspection to consider its decision. Law 7. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, Section 70: 7.1. Has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the [NAME]; 7.2. Disregards the effect on the rental value of the [NAME] of (a) any relevant tenant improvements and (b) any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy; 7.3. Assumes (as required by s70(2) that, whatever might be the case, the demand for similar rented properties in the locality does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent. In other

4

words that the effect of such 'scarcity' on rental values is not reflected in the fair rent of the subject [NAME].

8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that section 70 means: 8.1. that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the subject [NAME] discounted for “scarcity”, and 8.2. that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between these comparables and the subject [NAME])

9. Thus, once the market rent for the [NAME] has been determined by the exercise above, that rent must be adjusted, where necessary, for any scarcity.

10. The Tribunal must consider the application of the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 by calculating the maximum fair rent applicable to the [NAME] in accordance with the formula contained in the Order. Valuation and Fair Rent

11. The Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the [NAME] in the open market if it were let now in the condition that is considered fit and usual for such an open market letting.

5

12. The Tribunal carefully reviewed the comparables provided and it was considered that the [NAME] fell within the range of rents provided, but the Tribunal also had regard to the presence of central heating and the fact that these were asking rather than actual rents, and that the [NAME] has a much larger garden area than is usual for properties in the locality. The Tribunal considered that in the light of the evidence and its general knowledge of rents in the locality the market rent for the [NAME] in the condition referred to in paragraph 11 above would be £700 00 per calendar month including white goods and some furnishings.

13. Having regard to the condition of the [NAME] from its inspection and relying on its own and general experience in the region the Tribunal concluded that the [NAME] is below the condition considered fit and usual for a modern letting at such a market rent. Therefore, it was considered appropriate to make some adjustment and allow for the condition of the [NAME] as seen and commented upon by the Tribunal.

14.

Accordingly, the assessment of the fair rent is as follows: Market rent in good condition 700 00 per calendar month White goods and furnishings (70.00) Landlord’s neglect (10.00) Necessary improvements (100.00) Tenant’s improvements (10.00)

(190.00)

6

Occupational rent 00 per calendar month 510.00 15. The Tribunal does not consider that in the present-day market, there is any substantial scarcity element and accordingly no further deduction is made for scarcity 16. The rent is however, subject to the capping provisions of the 1999 order. After effecting the appropriate calculation, the Tribunal determined that the fair rent assessed above was below the maximum fair rent for the [NAME], which was calculated to be £545.50 per calendar month. Signed: [ADDRESS]: 02 May 2019