VadeLab
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £66/week fair rent for assured tenancy in Lancaster

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £66.00 per week for a property in Lancaster after considering its age, character, location, and condition. The rent excludes any scarcity element or improvements made by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A fair rent for a property must be assessed according to its age, character, locality, and state of repair, excluding any scarcity element or improvements made by the tenant.

Topics

fair rentproperty assessmenttenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a fair rent for a property considering various factors including age, character, locality, and state of repair.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property located in Lancaster, considering its age, character, locality, and state of repair, excluding any scarcity element or improvements made by the tenant. The fair rent was set at £66.00 per week, effective from 31 May 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UH/F77/2019/0022

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord Mr [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £66.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 31 May 2019

3. The amount for services is not applicable Per not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

not applicable Per not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £78.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of decision 31 May 2019

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 285.1

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 192.2

X 285.1 Minus Y 192.2 = (A) 92.9

(A) 92.9 Divided by Y 192.2 = (B) 0.4833506

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 : NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.5333506

Last registered rent* 51.00 Multiplied by (C) = 78.20 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 78.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £78.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

MAN/30UH/F77/2019/0022

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Mr [APPELLANT] of Application : Application requesting reasons for the determination of a Fair Rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 31st May 2019

Date of Reasons : 15th July 2019

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

2

Decision

The fair rent for the property at Flat 4, 3, Croftlands, [ADDRESS], Lancaster is determined at £66.00 per week with effect from 31st May 2019

Reasons for Decision

1 These are the reasons for the decision of the First-tier Property Tribunal appointed to set a fair rent for Flat 4, 3, Croftlands, [ADDRESS], Lancaster. The landlord of the property is Mr [APPELLANT] and the tenant is Mrs [APPELLANT].

2 Application was originally made for a fair rent on the appropriate Form 5 by the landlord and dated 21st November 2018. At that time the passing rent was stated as being £51.00 per week, registered by the Rent Officer on 4th July 2005 and effective from that date. This is not a property in respect of which any further charge is made for the provision of services.

3 Within the current application the landlord suggested a new fair rent of £79.00 per week. He subsequently provided submissions to the Rent Officer in support of his application by letter dated 21st November 2018, together with a copy of a structural inspection carried out by a Chartered Structural Engineer. There were also representations from the tenant submitted by letter dated 15th December 2018 and both parties made further submissions to the Tribunal. The Rent Officer also held a consultation at the property on 14th January 2019.

4 The Rent Officer and the Tribunal were also provided by copies of correspondence between the parties relating to the current condition of 3, Croftlands and also a report form a local estate agent as to the rental value of the subject property and advertised rents for lettings in the locality.

5 After consideration of this current application the Rent Officer set a new fair rent of £66.oo per week on 28th January 2019 to be effective from that date. This is below the level of the rent that would be the maximum rent permissible under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 and the amount of £66.00 per week was registered accordingly.

6 Following the decision of the Rent Officer the landlord objected to the registration and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal.

3

7 Accordingly, on the morning of 31st May 2019 the Tribunal comprising [NAME] (Judge) and [NAME] (valuer) inspected Flat 4 and found it to be a first floor flat within a 3 storey property which is divided into a number of separate dwelling units. The building is understood to date from about 1860 and is of stone construction, under a slate roof. The building is currently undergoing extensive renovation which would appear to require considerable time to complete. Work has already been carried out in relation to fire safety requirements, fabric repairs and the demolition of a former garage. The ground floor of the premises is now the subject of redevelopment. The roof over the entrance to the building appears to be in poor condition.

8 The flat itself consists of one reception room and one bedroom together with kitchen and bathroom/wc. A metal fire escape from the bedroom appears to be in poor condition. The flat itself is spacious for the nature of the accommodation and reflects the room sizes of the original building. The bathroom is dated and the kitchen would be very basic, but for improvements carried out by the tenant, who has also provided the only form of heating, which is electric. Double glazing is absent. There would appear to be some continuing problem with relatively minor, but constant, damp/water penetration and the aluminium window frames are also dated. Externally, the front pathway/yard is currently in a state of renovation. The property is situated within easy walking distance of the local amenities of Lancaster City Centre and from where public transport is available to destinations further afield.

9 In the absence of a request for a hearing by either party the Tribunal reconvened later the same day to consider what it had seen on its inspection and read in the extensive submissions that had been received.

10 The primary duty upon a Tribunal is to assess a fair rent in accordance with S70 Rent Act 1977: that is to assess a market rent for the property having regard to its age, character, locality, state of repair and any other relevant circumstances, but disregarding any increase in that rent attributable to the “scarcity element”, that being the amount by which the market rent is increased by there being a greater demand for than availability of similar properties to let in the locality, and also discounting any improvements made by the tenant outside the tenancy agreement or any disrepair attributable to the tenant in breach of the agreement. (Given what is set out below the committee determined in due course that no such “scarcity element” existed). Personal circumstances of the parties are also to be disregarded.

4

11 So far as an appropriate fair rent is concerned there has been well established guidance for the benefit of Tribunals handed down by the High Court and the Court of Appeal as to how they fulfil their obligations with regard to assessing the rent and properly taking into account the above factors e.g [COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester and Lancashire Rent Assessment Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92

12 The clearest starting point is to consider any similar property, if such exists, in the locality let at a market rent under the Housing Act 1988, using that rent as the basis for a fair rent but then making the appropriate deductions. Direct evidence was given to the Tribunal, within the landlord’s submission, of rents being sought for properties in the locality considered to be comparable. The Tribunal may then also use its own experience and skill gained from setting both fair and market rents over the whole of North West England generally, and Lancashire in particular, in order to assess the appropriate fair rents for the property and the strength of the evidence submitted.

13 the Tribunal was not convinced by the evidence provided by [NAME], given the nature of the spartan information about the comparable properties and what appeared to be the more modern nature of most of them. It also appeared that there had been no direct attendance by them to the subject property to bolster the view that a rent of £575.00 to £600.00 per month might be attainable (particularly as the majority appear to have been advertised, and not necessarily let, at £550.00 per month).

14 The Tribunal considered a more likely achievable market rent for a property such as Flat 4, would be in the region of £475.00 per month, or its weekly equivalent of £110.00, given that the rent has been registered historically on a weekly basis. This would better reflect the age and corresponding characteristics of the building and the current state of ongoing renovations. Modern lettings also tend to reflect the provision of carpets, curtains and white goods, not present here and for the lack of those items a deduction of £11.00 per week should be made from that starting point. The Tribunal then considered further discounts of £6.00 and £7.00 appropriate to reflect the lack of double glazing and central heating respectively. Given the nature of the contents of the thumbnail photographs of the suggested comparables, those properties reflect far more modern kitchen and bathroom facilities than those at the subject property. A further allowance of £20.00 per week should be made for their dated condition. These amounts reduce the net rent to £66.00 per week.

5

15 This amount is below the maximum fair rent allowable under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 of £78.50 per week at the time of the Tribunal’s determination. The Tribunal accordingly determines the fair rent for Flat 4, 3, Croftlands, [ADDRESS], Lancaster to be £66.00 per week, with effect from 31st May 2019, that being the date of the determination.

[NAME] (Judge)

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's age and character were considered in determining the fair rent.
  • The current state of repair, including ongoing renovations, was factored into the assessment.
  • The lack of modern amenities like double glazing and central heating justified a reduction in the proposed rent.
  • The dated condition of the bathroom and kitchen led to further deductions from the initial market rent estimate.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Evidence provided by the landlord regarding comparable properties was not convincing due to their more modern nature.
  • The suggested market rent of £575.00 to £600.00 per month for similar properties was deemed unrealistic without direct inspection and verification.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £66.00 per week for an assured tenancy.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the fair rent for an assured tenancy in Lancaster.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set a fair rent of £66.00 per week, considering the property's age, character, locality, and state of repair.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to consider the property's age and condition when setting the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent of £66.00 per week.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair rent assessment that takes into account the property's age and condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the property's age, character, locality, and state of repair.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.