Tribunal sets £852/month rent for assured tenancy in London
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £852.00 per lunar month. This decision was made according to the Rent Act 1977, ensuring the rent is fair and reasonable.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, specifically setting the fair rent at £852.00 per lunar month.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £852.00 per lunar month, excluding certain charges but including others.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £852.00 per lunar month for a property under the Rent Act 1977, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges. The calculation adheres to the formula outlined in the Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/F77/2021/0208
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £852.00 Per Lunar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 27 July 2021
3. The amount for services is N/A Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply. 7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the below the maximum fair rent of £895.00 per month including services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
Chairman Ms [NAME] [NAME]- [NAME] of decision 27 July 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 304
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 258.5
X 304 Minus Y 258.5 = (A) 45.5
(A) 45.5 Divided by Y 285.5 = (B) 0.15937
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.20937
Last registered rent* 740.00 Multiplied by (C) = 894.93 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 895.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £895.00 Per Lunar Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £17,280 Annual Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Northumberlan…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £103 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £880/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £16,584/year Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Ealing
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £1790/month Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £808.43/Month Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Northumberland
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £177.23/week Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £17,304 Per Annum Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £122/week fair rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £212/week Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £840 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4162264
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the fair rent for an assured tenancy at £852.00 per lunar month.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was over the fair rent for an assured tenancy, specifically whether it should be set below the maximum fair rent threshold.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to set the fair rent at £852.00 per lunar month because it was below the maximum fair rent threshold of £895.00 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied to determine the fair rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the calculation showing that the proposed fair rent was below the maximum fair rent threshold.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the fair rent was set below the maximum fair rent threshold.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, the decision means that their fair rent could also be set below the maximum fair rent threshold if the calculations support it.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the calculation of the maximum fair rent and the application of the Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11.
