Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Objection
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £6,480 per year for a tenant after the landlord disagreed with the previously registered rent. This decision was made considering the property's condition and similar rental prices in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal after an objection to a previously registered rent.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property following an objection to a previously registered rent.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £6,480 per annum for a property after the landlord objected to a previously registered rent. The decision was based on comparable evidence and the Tribunal's assessment of the property's condition and amenities.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR27 2088First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/23UD/F77/2025/0613
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] Judge Percival
Landlord Projects by [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £6480.00 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 7 May 2025
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £6938.50 per Annum prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 7 May 2025
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 395.30
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 358.30
X 395.30 Minus Y 377.30 = (A) 37.00
(A) 37.00 Divided by Y 358.30 = (B) 0.1033
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1533
Last registered rent* £6016.00 Multiplied by (C) = £6938.25 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £6938.50
Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £6938.50 Per Annum
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/23UD/F77/2025/0613 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] :
None
Landlord : Projects by [RESPONDENT] : [NAME] of Application :
Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge R Percival Date of Objection : 29th January 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :
7th May 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £6,480 per annum with effect from 7th May 2025.
HAV/23UD/2025/0613 2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 15th October 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.
2. The rent was previously registered on 10th November 2022 at £6,016 per annum, equating to £501.33 per month, following a determination by the Rent Officer.
3. On 2nd December 2024 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £6,713.20 per annum, equating to £559.42 per month, for the property to take effect from the 2nd December 2024.
4. On 29th January 2025 the Landlord’s Agent objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
6. There were no additional written submissions from either party. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £800 per month. Residential rents are normally quoted as a monthly figure.
8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.
9. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration, unmodernised kitchen and bathroom and lack of central heating.
10. The Tribunal noted the numbers of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.
11. The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘E’.
HAV/23UD/2025/0613 3 12. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £800 Less deductions for:- Unmodernised kitchen
£100 Tenant’s provision of white goods
£30 Lack of central heating
£80 Unmodernised bathroom
£50
____
Total deduction per month
£260 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£540
13. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £540 per calendar month which equates to £6,480 per annum.
14. This rent takes effect from 7th May 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
15. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below or equal to the maximum fair rent of £6,938.50 permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly we determine that the limit set by the Order does not apply in this case.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for listed rural cottage
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £1,025 for Kent Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Property Under the Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Controlled Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £840 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Retail Price Index.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's current state and market conditions.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £6,480 per year for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument about the property's condition and comparable rental prices was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might benefit from having their rent reviewed by a tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
