Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Adjusting for Tenant Improvements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and the tenant's improvements. The rent was set at £155 per week, effective from 31 January 2022.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment for property conditions and tenant-provided fixtures.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for tenant-provided fixtures and damp issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, considering the age, location, and state of repair of the property, and adjusting for tenant-provided fixtures and property conditions. The fair rent was set at £155 per week, effective from 31 January 2022.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 99 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [APPELLANT]
Landlord Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £155.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 31 January 2022
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £155.76 per Week.
[NAME] of decision 31 January 2022
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 317.7
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 291.0
X 317.7 Minus Y 291.0 = (A) 26.7
(A) 26.7 Divided by Y 291.0 = (B) 0.0918
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1418
Last registered rent* £135.50 Multiplied by (C) = 154.71 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £155.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £155.00 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056 Property : 99 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Joint landlords : Mr [COUNSEL] & Mrs [COUNSEL] :
None
Tenant : Miss [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] D [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 31st January 2022
DECISION
CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056
2 Summary of Decision
On 31st January 2022 the Tribunal determined a fair rent of £155 per week with effect from 31st January 2022.
Background 1. On 10th September 2021 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £190 per week for the above property. This would equate to £823.33 per month.
2. The rent was previously registered on the 10th September 2019 at £135.50 per week following a determination by the Tribunal. This equates to £587.17 per calendar month.
3. Following a consultation by telephone the rent was registered by the Rent Officer on the 26th October 2021 at a figure of £150 per week with effect from the 26th October 2021. This equates to £650 per month.
4. By a letter dated received by the Rent Officer on 29th September 2021 the Tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and of Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.
7. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal might also consider information about the property available on the internet and the parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished. Representations were made which were copied to both parties.
The Property 8. The property is described within the papers as a self-contained ground floor flat within a two-storey purpose-built building comprising a Lounge, Dining Room, Kitchen, two Bedrooms. Bathroom, Conservatory and has a Garden.
9. The property is built of a form of reconstructed stone elevations all beneath a tiled roof. It is situated on a busy but wide road about 500 metres from a beach and 1 ½ miles from the centre of Weymouth. There are local shops within reach of the property and a good range of retail and educational facilities within Weymouth.
CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056
3
10. The accommodation has the benefit of gas-fired central heating.
11. During the telephone consultation with the Rent Officer the Tenant said that the rent is too high, the front door is ill-fitting, there is some damp in the Lounge and main Bedroom, the windows are ill fitting, and she has replaced the gas fire in the Lounge with an electric fire.
Evidence and representations 12. The Tenant maintains that the rent is too high.
13. White goods, curtains and carpets are all provided by the Tenant, the Kitchen is unmodernised and the Tenant is obliged to keep the internal decorations in reasonable order.
14. The Tribunal had regard to the observations and comments by the parties and also relied on its own knowledge and experience of local rental values in determining the rent.
The Law 15. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
16. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
17. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is
CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056
4 below the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.
Consideration and decision 18. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
19. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels around Weymouth and south Dorset.
20. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £845 per calendar month.
21. However, the property is not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £845 per calendar month particularly to reflect the fact that the carpets, curtains and white goods were all provided by the Tenant which would not be the case for an open market assured shorthold tenancy. Further adjustments should be made to reflect the unmodernised Kitchen and internal dampness.
22. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £170 per month made up as follows:
Provision of carpets £35 Provision of curtains £25 Provision of white goods £40 Damp issues and mould £20 Unmodernised Kitchen £50
____ TOTAL £170
23. The Tribunal did not consider that it should make any further reductions in respect of the windows, door and replacement fire.
24. The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element in the area of Weymouth and south Dorset.
Decision 25. Having made the adjustments indicated above the fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £675 per calendar month equating to £155.76 per week.
CHI/19UJ/F77/2021/0056
5 26. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Committee is above the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly we determine that the lower sum of £155 per week is registered as the fair rent with effect from 31st January 2022.
Accordingly, the sum of £155 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from the 31st January 2022 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £830 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for tenant's property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Brighton Property at £231 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant providing carpets led to a £35 per month deduction from the market rent.
- The tenant providing curtains led to a £25 per month deduction from the market rent.
- The tenant providing white goods led to a £40 per month deduction from the market rent.
- Damp issues and mould in the property led to a £20 per month deduction from the market rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's arguments regarding ill-fitting windows did not lead to a further rent reduction.
- The tenant's arguments regarding an ill-fitting door did not lead to a further rent reduction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £155 per week for the property, effective from 31 January 2022.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and the tenant's improvements, adjusting the rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need to adjust the rent for the tenant's improvements and the property's condition.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that accounted for the property's condition and the tenant's improvements.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any improvements they've made when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the tenant's improvements were key pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over rent.
