Tribunal sets fair rent for property after considering condition and market comparables
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £594 per month for a property, effective from 9th October 2020, after considering the property's condition and market comparables, subject to statutory caps under the Rent Act 1977.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market comparables, subject to statutory caps.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering various factors including the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £594 per month for a property, effective from 9th October 2020, after considering the property's condition and market comparables, subject to statutory caps under the Rent Act 1977.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BD/F77/2020/0088
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 102 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
[APPELLANT]
Tenant [NAME]([APPELLANT])
1. The fair rent is £594.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 09 October 2020
3. The amount for services is Nil Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Nil Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £640.50 per month.
[NAME] D [NAME] of decision 09 October 2020
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 293.3
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 278.3
X 293.3 Minus Y 278.3 = (A) 15
(A) 15 Divided by Y 278.3 = (B) 0.053899
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.103899
Last registered rent* 580 Multiplied by (C) = 640.26 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 640.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £640.50 Per Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BD/F77/2020/0088 Property : 102 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : [COMPANY] of application : Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Decision
£594.00 per month is to be registered as the fair rent for the above property with effect from 9th October 2020 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
The reasons for this decision are set out below.
Reasons
Background
On 7th January 2020 [RESPONDENT] on behalf of the landlord, applied to the Valuation Office Agency (Rent Officer) for registration of a fair rent of £696 per month for the property.
The rent payable at the time of the application was £580 per month, effective from 16h March 2018 It was noted a rent of £600 had been registered by the Rent Officer and the rent of £580 per month was a First Tier Tribunal decision.
On 26th. February 2020 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £620 per month. The Rent Officer commented in the Remarks section of the Rent Register that this was a former protected tenant of the same landlord. The increase imposed by the Rent Officer had not been “capped” or limited by the operation of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 ( the Order).
By letter dated 2nd February 2020 the tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to this Tribunal.
The law
When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant, on the rental value of the property.
Section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 imposes on the Tribunal an assumption that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling house in the locality on the terms ( other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms. This is commonly called ‘scarcity’.
[COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester Council (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] Tribunal [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 places a “cap” on the permissible amount of the increase of a fair rent between one registration and the next, by reference to the amount of the increase in the United Kingdom Index of Retail Prices between the dates of the two registrations. Where the cap applies the Rent Officer and the Tribunal is prevented from increasing the amount of the fair rent that it registers beyond the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Order and the mathematical formula set out in the Order. By article 2(7) of the 1999 Order the capping provisions do not apply “in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling-house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a [NAME], the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.” Facts found including Inspection
In view of the current restrictions the Tribunal did not inspect the property and relied on information provided by the parties together with its expert knowledge. The property is a Victorian mid terrace house located in an established residential area amongst properties of a comparable type and age convenient to local amenities and station..
The accommodation comprises: five rooms kitchen.outside WC and garden.
There is no central heating system and no internal bathroom or lavatory.This seems completely incredulous in this day and age.and it must be appropriate for the landlord to take immediate steps to provide reasonable sanitary provisons.
Terms of the tenancy
It is understood that this tenancy began in 1963. It is agreed that the landlord is responsible for structural repairs and external decoration; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The property is let unfurnished.
Tenant's improvements
The tenant has not provided any information regarding improvements made to the property.
Evidence
The Tribunal had copies of the Valuation Office Agency correspondence including the rent registers effective 9th November 2017 and 16th March 2020.
Valuation
In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
We consider that the subject property, if finished to a reasonable standard would be likely to attract a rent let on an assured shorthold tenancy, for around £1650 per month
Next, we need to adjust that hypothetical rent of £1650 per month to allow for the differences between the terms of this tenancy, the lack of internal washing facilities, lavatory, central heating and general dilapidated condition.
Using our own expertise we considered that a significant deduction of 55% should applied in order to take into account the terms of the tenancy, no internal washing facilities, no internal lavatory, no central heating and a general dilapidation to the fabric of the property This provides a deduction of £908 from the hypothetical rent
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant. Scarcity
Thirdly, the tribunal then went on to consider whether a deduction falls to be made to reflect scarcity within the meaning of section 70(2) of the 1977 Act. The tribunal followed the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] v [NAME], in which it was held that scarcity over a wide area should be considered rather than scarcity in relation to a particular locality. Greater London is considered to be an appropriate area to use as a yardstick for measuring scarcity and it is clear that there is a substantial measure of scarcity in Greater London.
We therefore made a further deduction of approximately 20% (£148) from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element to produce a figure of £594 per month.
Conclusion
If we apply the capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order. The capped fair rent in accordance with the calculations is £640.50.
Therefore, the fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 and a rent of £594 per month is effective from the 9th October 2020 being the date of the Committee’s decision.
Detailed calculations are provided on the back of the Tribunals decision form already issued and dated 9th October 2020).
[NAME] 7th December 2020
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for Harrow property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent of £325 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The effective date for the new fair rent was set as 09 October 2020.
- The property's lack of central heating, internal bathroom, and lavatory required a significant deduction from the hypothetical market rent.
- A deduction of approximately 20% was made for scarcity in Greater London, as there is a substantial shortage of similar properties.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The argument that the capping provisions of the 1999 Order did not apply due to repairs or improvements was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £594 per month for a property, effective from 9th October 2020.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, subject to statutory caps.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the market comparables.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when seeking a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Information provided by the parties and the expert knowledge of the Tribunal mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
