VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and Amenities

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £285.00 per week. They took into account the property's condition and amenities, ensuring the rent reflects current market conditions and the state of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of repair of the property.

Topics

fair rent determinationrent act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the condition and amenities of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a property considering its condition and amenities, adhering to the Rent Act 1977. The rent was set at £285.00 per week, effective from 20 June 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2024/0031

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 27 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT] JP

[APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 285.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 20 June 2024

3. The amount for services is 32.40 Per week

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

9.46 Per week

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 344.50 .......................... per week ................................................................................................................ including £ 32.40 ................................ per week ........................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 20 June 2024

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 385

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.3

X 385 Minus Y 314.3 = (A) 70.7

(A) 70.7 Divided by Y 314.3 = (B) 0.22494

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.27494

Last registered rent* 270.00 Multiplied by (C) = 344.23 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 344.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £344.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference

: LON/00BK/F77/2024/0031

Property : 27 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 20 June 2024

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Mr [NAME] JP

Date of Reasons : 20 June 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £285.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 20 June 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. The property was previously the subject of a registered rent of £270.00 per week including £34.02 services and £7.11 fuel charges registered on 9 November 2021 and effective from the same date.

2. Following an application by the landlord the rent was registered on and effective from 8 November 2023 at £306.00 per week including £32.40 services and fuel charges of £9.46 per week not counting for rent allowance.

3. Following an objection from the Tenant dated 22 November 2023 to the determination of the fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

4. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 20 June 2024.

Evidence

5. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant stating that she objected to the increase in rent because no repairs or improvements to the building or flats had been made over 10 years and not since the rent was last registered.

6. The Landlord provided details of the service charge expenditure and fuel costs applicable to the flat.

7. The tribunal considered that the flat was in a convenient location but in a block which had a tired appearance to the exterior and common parts. The flat lacks a proper kitchen with cooking facilities in what is in effect a cupboard.

8. No comparable rental evidence was provided by either party.

The Law

9. When determining a fair rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, the tribunal has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property.

10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasized that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. These rents may have to be adjusted where

necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property.

11. The rent has been previously registered, and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 therefore applies unless there are significant improvements made by the Landlord which increase the rent which would be registered by more than 15%. There are no such improvements in this case. It is clear the previous registration certificate was prepared on an incorrect basis as it refers to modernisation and central heating. However, this tribunal has no power to review the previous registration which should have been appealed at the time it was made. The registration is therefore the starting point for assessing the new rent under the Order. The Order sets out the basis for calculating the new rent which is the increase in the Retail Prices Index plus 5% where the rent has previously been registered.

Determination and Valuation

12. In the absence of comparable evidence from the parties the tribunal has relied on our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £475.00 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. No proper kitchen b. No carpets curtains or white goods

c. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity of letting property in the locality of Greater London and using its knowledge and experience made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent.

13. The full valuation is shown below:

Fair rent PW Market rent 475.00 £ less condition & terms 25% 118.75 -£ adjusted rent 356.25 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 71.25 -£ Fair rent 285.00 £

14. The Tribunal determines a rent of £285.00 per week for the purposes of s70.

Decision

15. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £285.00 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

is calculated at £344.50 per week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

16. The lower figure is to be registered as the fair rent and in this case it is the lower rent of £285.00 per week which is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 20 June 2024

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber

The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent reflecting current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the property's state of repair.
  • The tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent calculated according to the Retail Price Index.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment using the prescribed formula in the Rent Acts Order.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £285.00 per week for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, ensuring the rent reflects current market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and amenities of their property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and an inspection of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.