Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £11,232 per year for a property in Sutton, Surrey. They considered the condition of the property and scarcity when making their decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the condition of the property and scarcity.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including the condition of the property and scarcity.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £11,232 per annum for a property located at 28 Grove Avenue, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 2DP, under the Rent Act 1977. The decision took into account the condition of the property and scarcity, among other factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BF/F77/2023/0206
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £11,232.00 Per annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 5 September 2023
3. The amount for services is
Per
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).
(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 13140.00 ...................... per annum ............................................................................................................. including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 5 September 2023
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 374.2
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 301.9
X 374.2 Minus Y 301.9 = (A) 72.3
(A) 72.3 Divided by Y 301.9 = (B) 0.239483
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.289483
Last registered rent* 10190 Multiplied by (C) = 13139.83 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £13140.00
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £13140.00 Per Annum
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference
: LON/00BF/F77/2023/0206
Property : 28 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mrs [APPELLANT] M [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 17 May 2023
Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 5 September 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £13,140 per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 5 September 2023, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 3. There were no written submissions from the parties.
Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1500 per calendar month (£18,000 pa). From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
The assumed dated condition of the flat occupied since 1961
5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Fair rent PCM PA Market rent 1,500.00 £ 18,000.00 £ less condition 22% 330.00 -£ 3,960.00 -£ adjusted rent 1,170.00 £ 14,040.00 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 234.00 -£ 2,808.00 -£ Fair rent 936.00 £ 11,232.00 £
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £11,232 per annum and this equates to £936 per calendar month.
Decision 8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £11232.00 per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at
£13140.00 per annum. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £11232.00 per annum is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.
Chairman: [NAME]: 5 September 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Based on RPI Changes
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Awarded £360 Weekly Rent by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Tenant Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Maximum Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £850 Per Month Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined based on the Tribunal's expert knowledge of rental values in the area.
- A further adjustment was made to the adjusted rent to account for scarcity in the housing market.
- The uncapped fair rent was determined to be £11,232.00 per annum.
- The registered fair rent is the lower of the uncapped fair rent and the maximum fair rent calculated under the 1999 Order.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £11,232 per year for a property in Sutton, Surrey.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and scarcity, among other factors.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and scarcity.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent determination based on the condition of the property and scarcity.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and scarcity were the key factors considered in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
