Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BD/F77/2021/0288

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] MA LLM FRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Miss M [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1125 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 8 February 2022

3. The amount for services is £16.94 Per month

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 1252.00 per month including £ 16.94 per month for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 8 February 2022

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 317.70

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 291.00

X 317.70 Minus Y 291.00 = (A) 26.70

(A) 26.70 Divided by Y 291.00 = (B) 0.084

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1340

Last registered rent* 1104.00 Multiplied by (C) = £1251.98 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1252

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services £16.94

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1252.00 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference

: LON/OOBD/F77/2021/0288

[NAME] : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Miss [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Mr [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] MA LLM FRICS

HMCTS Code : P-Paper (paper, video, audio)

Date of Decision : 8th February 2022

Date of Statement of Reasons : 8th February 2022

_______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

Background The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 8th February 2022 of the determined Fair Rent of £1125 per calendar month with effect from the same. By way of application received by Rent Officer on 11 August 2021 the landlord of the [NAME] applied for re registration of a fair rent of £1214.40 per calendar month (pcm), the rent having been previously registered on the 6 September 2019 of £1104 pcm with £16.94 for service charge. The Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £1121 pcm with £16.94 pcm service charge effective from 29 September 2021. In a letter dated 19th October 2021 the landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) ([NAME]). Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 10 November 2021 and subsequently amended 26 November 2021. In those Directions, the parties were informed that in accordance with Public Health England’s advice to avoid unnecessary travel and social interaction for the time being, the Tribunal would not hold an oral hearing, unless so requested by either or both the parties, or would it inspect the [NAME]. Neither party has requested a hearing. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the [NAME] and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. In due course, the Landlord and the Tenant filed their written submissions. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. Following the issue of the Tribunals decision which was based on the written and visual evidence submitted by the parties that was germane to the determination of a fair rent, the landlord sought extended reasons for the Tribunal’s decision. The [NAME] The [NAME] is a two bedroomed, self-contained converted flat on the first floor of a late Victorian / Edwardian house in Richmond Surrey. The accommodation comprises a kitchen/dinner, bathroom and separate WC to the rear, with 2 bedrooms and a lounge at the front. It has central heating and mains electricity, gas, water and drainage. The windows are single-glazed throughout. The tenant has use of a bin store and the front garden shared with the two other flats. Relevant Law

Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME] to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME]; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME] of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the

condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the [NAME]. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any [NAME] in [NAME] under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the [NAME]. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the [NAME] discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject [NAME]).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent.

Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord

By way of email dated 14th December 2021, the landlord notes, that there has been no receipt of any written notification of any faults in the [NAME] in the last 12 months and so assumes all is in order. The landlord also notes they have not received any copy of the tenants Reply Form submissions to the tribunal. By undated e mail, the landlord, submits that the tenant has failed by 8 December 2021 to supply copy of correspondence to the landlord, and as a consequence request that tenant’s evidence is inadmissible. Also, the landlord notes that no contact has been had from the tenant. By way of letter dated 16 November 2021, the landlord detailed the condition of the [NAME] and what repairs they had carried out. Additionally, evidence of rental levels was submitted. Finally, a letter dated 6 January 2022 detail a set of purported events which were generally not material to the determination of the fair rent but demonstrate the relationship between landlord and tenant is stained. Tenant The tenant made a number of submissions to the tribunal to extend the directions. The directions were extended, and further submissions made to extend them further. There was submission in the form of a hand written annotated letter from the landlord to the tenant dated 8 December 2021 on original letter of 1 December 2021. The letter notes the recent offer of repairs and the ill health of the tenant. There are a set of photographs showing the external of the [NAME], which shows scaffolding largely without boards and a photograph of the doorbells. There is a letter to the tribunal from the tenant, dated 24th December 2021 noting the nature and condition of the [NAME]. Additionally, a letter sent to the tribunal dated 20th December 2021 and received 29th December 2021 detailing the condition of the [NAME] and noting rental values in the area. An e mail was received from the tenant to the tribunal dated 6th February 2022 noting that the tenant supplied “white goods” for the [NAME]. It is not known if the landlord received a copy of the e mail but no further submissions were made from the landlord on this point. Notwithstanding the late receipt of the email of the 6th February its contents did not add further to the tribunal’s understanding, as this position was expressed by the landlord and also noted in the previous tribunal decision.

Reasons for Decision The tribunal considered all relevant material submitted including reference to previous decisions which are not binding on the tribunal but were considered for wider context.

Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that such a likely market rent, if a market rent is adopted would be £1875.00 per week. However, the [NAME] is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 10% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted.

Market derived rental level - £1875.00 pcm Less 10% condition Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods Less 20% for scarcity. The rent after this final adjustment was £1125.00 per month.

Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £ 1251.98 pcm . This figure is more than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments of £1125.00 per month.

Accordingly, the sum of £1125.00 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 8th February 2022, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 8th February 2022 Extended reasons : 8th February 2022.

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.