Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy After Assessing Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, considering the property's condition and market comparables. The rent was set at £167.30 per week, effective from 13th March 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current condition and market value of the property, adjusted for relevant factors.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the condition of the property and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The rent was set at £167.30 per week, effective from 13th March 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/F77/2022/0160
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] QPM
Landlord Northumberland and [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £167.30 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 13th March 2023
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
n/a
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £183.00 per week prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 13th March 2023
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 360.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 294.3
X 360.4 Minus Y 294.3 = (A) 66.1
(A) 66.1 Divided by Y 294.3 = (B) 0.2246
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2746
Last registered rent* 143.00 Multiplied by (C) = 182.26 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 182.50
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services no
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £182.50 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference
: LON/OOAE/F77/2022/0160
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] MA LLM FRICS Mr [NAME] : On Papers (paper, video, audio)
Date of Decision : 13th March 2023
Date of Statement of Reasons: 13th March 2023
_______________________________________________
Statement of Reasons
____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
Background The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 13th March 2023 of the determined Fair Rent of £167.30 per week with effect from same date. By way of application, received by the Rent Officer on 6th July 2022, made by the landlord of the property, applied for re registration of a fair rent of £ 718.80 per month. Previously the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £143.00 per week with effect from 6th October 2020. The Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £172.50 per week with effect from 6th October 2022. In a letter dated 22nd August 2022 Mr [NAME] objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property). Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 13th September 2023. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property The property is a self-contained conversion flat, first floor, two rooms, kitchen/ diner and backs onto the railway, no central heating and bathroom/WC. The bathroom had a bath supplied by the landlord but taps by the tenant. The ceiling was damaged from an historic water leak and cracking. The basin supplied by the landlord. There was a double-glazed window supplied by landlord approximately 5 years ago. The kitchen/diner had a new gas water heater supplied by the landlord. The kitchen was installed by the tenant. The window was doubled glazed and again installed 5 years ago. The bedroom had single glazed original sash window, the ceiling of the broom was cracked, above the window the plaster was cracked and damp by the skirting board. The living room had similar single glazed sash windows, with cracked ceiling and signs of historic damp in the corner. A small storage cupboard on the stairs. No lift.
Relevant Law
Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.
(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or
any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”
Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining t2he market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).
In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Predetermination submissions Landlord
No submissions from landlord other than initial application to register a fair rent and the objection notice. Tenant The email objection dated 22nd August 2022, noting “that they “strongly object to the very large rent increase”. The Determination No hearing was requested by the parties, nor one felt proportionate, so the matter was addressed on papers. Reasons for Decision The tribunal has also inspected. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of the Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that such a likely market rent, if a market rent is adopted would be £ 1450.00 However, the Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 20% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. Market derived rental level - £1450 per month Less 20% condition Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods Less 20% for scarcity. The rent after this final adjustment was £725.00 per month or £167.30 per week. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £ 182.50 per week. This figure is higher than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £ 167.30 per week.
Accordingly, the sum of £167.30 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 13th March 2023 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 13th March 2023 Extended reasons: 13th March 2023
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and Service Char…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £1,250 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £750 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The effective date for the new fair rent is 13th March 2023.
- The property's market rent, if in usual condition for a modern letting, was estimated at £1450.00 per month.
- A 20% deduction was applied to the market rent due to the property's actual condition not being usual for a modern letting.
- A further 10% deduction was made because the tenancy terms and supplied goods differed from contemporary assured shorthold tenancies.
- A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity, as required by section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977.
- The maximum fair rent calculated under the 1999 Order was £182.50 per week, which was higher than the adjusted market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £167.30 per week for a property.
Who was involved?
The tenant objected to a proposed rent increase, leading to a determination by the Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and market comparables to determine a fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the property was not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the property's condition and market comparables was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
