VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £100 Per Week for Nottingham Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has decided that the fair rent for a property in Nottingham should be £100 per week, starting from 17th January 2024, following the guidelines set by the Rent Act 1977.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal according to the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreementrent regulation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £100 per week, effective from 17th January 2024, for a property in Nottingham.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £100 per week for a property in Nottingham, effective from 17th January 2024, under the Rent Act 1977.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/37UD/F77/2023/0057

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £100.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 17th January 2024

3. The amount for services is Included Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £136 per week including services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 17/01/2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 283.00

X 377.3 Minus Y 283.00 = (A) 94.3 (A) 94.3 Divided by Y 283.00 = (B) 0.3332

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.3832

Last registered rent* £98.00 Multiplied by (C) = £135.53 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £136.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services Included

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £136.00 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal according to the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent is determined by considering the property's condition and market conditions.
  • The maximum fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The rent is capped at the lower of the market-adjusted rent or the maximum fair rent as prescribed by law.
  • The fair rent calculation takes into account the Retail Price Index and relevant regulations.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property in Nottingham was set at £100 per week, effective from 17th January 2024.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and a tenant regarding a property in Nottingham.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977, ensuring the rent is fair and reasonable.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied to determine the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument focused on setting a fair rent that complies with the Rent Act 1977.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents related to the property and the current rental agreement were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for advice on such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.