VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977. They considered the property's condition and the current market rent levels to determine the fair rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rentrent act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the property's condition and market rent levels. The decision was made by Mrs Catherine Wood on 12 February 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BU/F77/2020/0052

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 181 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £133.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 12 February 2021

3. The amount for services is Not applicable Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Not applicable Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry.

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £220 per week.

[NAME] of decision 12 February 2021

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 295.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.3

X 295.4 Minus Y 275.3 = (A) 20.1

(A) 20.1 Divided by Y 275.3 = (B) 0.0730112

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999: NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1230112

Last registered rent* £118.50 Multiplied by (C) = 133.076882 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £133.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £133.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference :

MAN/00BU/F77/2020/0052

Property : 181 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenants :

[NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord :

[NAME] of Application :

Rent Act 1977 – Section 70

Tribunal Members :

Tribunal Judge C [NAME]

[NAME] of Decision :

12 February 2021

Date of Reasons :

16 March 2021

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

1. Order

The Tribunal determines that the fair rent payable is £133.50 per week.

2. Background 2.1 The Tenants hold under a weekly tenancy governed by Part VI of the Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”). By an application dated 18 November 2019, the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £109.94 per week. The last registered rent on 27 October 2017, effective from 16 December 2017, was £118.50 per week. 2.2 On 6 January 2020, the Rent Officer registered a rent of £131.50 per week. 2.3 The Tenants objected to the rent as registered and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (“the Tribunal”), and so the fair rent to be registered in respect of the Property fell to be determined by the Tribunal. 2.4 The application was scheduled for determination on Friday 12 February 2021. The Tribunal conducted an external drive-by inspection of the Property on 11 February 2021 prior to the determination.

3. Inspection 3.1 The Property is a mid-terraced property with a small garden to the front. It is located in a residential area with access to local amenities. The accommodation comprises, on the ground floor, hall, 2 reception rooms, kitchen and utility room. On the first floor, there are 3 bedrooms and the bathroom/WC and, on the second floor, 2 further bedrooms. The Property is double-glazed and has gas central heating. There is a yard to the rear of the Property. 3.3 From its external inspection, the Tribunal noted no evidence of neglect or disrepair at the Property.

4. The Law 4.1 When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances, save for personal circumstances, including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also, as required by law, disregards the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under

the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. In this way a landlord does not benefit by way of increased rent from any tenant’s improvements and the tenant does not benefit from any defaults on his or her part that would otherwise have lowered the rental value of the property. 4.2. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised (a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).

5. Reasons 5.1 In making its determination, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence to the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in the locality. 5.2 The Tribunal noted, in particular, that the area was very popular for student accommodation with many rents reflective of houses in multiple occupation, rather than, as in the case of the Property, for occupancy by a single family/household. The Tribunal considered that such HMOs were not to be considered as comparables. 5.3 The Tribunal determined as follows: (i) that an open market rent for the Property would be £250.00 per week; (ii) this rent was then adjusted as follows: £ per week

Open market rent per week : 250.00

Less:

Lack of provision of white goods, carpets

and curtains

: 30.00

Fair Rent:

£220.00 per week

Maximum Fair Rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts

(Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999: £133.50 per week

5.4 The Tribunal does not consider that in the present day market, there is any substantial scarcity element and accordingly no further deduction is made for scarcity.

Judge C [NAME] 16 March 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tribunal considers the condition and terms of the property when determining a fair rent.
  • The tribunal takes market comparables into account for calculating a fair rent.
  • The fair rent reflects the market rent adjusted for the property's condition and terms of tenancy.
  • The maximum fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market rent levels.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the maximum fair rent using the formula provided by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the current market rent levels when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and market rent levels mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.