VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £575.00 per month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, considering comparable properties in the area and ignoring any improvements made by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured periodic tenancy, as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancytribunal decision

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering comparable properties in the area. Any improvements made by the tenant that increased the property's value are disregarded when determining the rent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, considering comparable properties in the locality.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £575.00 per calendar month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account comparable properties in the locality and disregarding any improvements made by the tenant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/45UC/MNR/2022/0027

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 575.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 April 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 December 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Double bed; fridge/freezer; chest of drawers; wardrobe/mirror; bedside table; cupboard.

8. Description of premises Attic bedroom with ensuite bathroom in a 3 storey end-terraced HMO licenced for 6 occupiers. Shared kitchen facilities. Rent includes council tax, electricity, gas, water, broadband, communal cleaning, gardening.

[NAME] of Decision 13 June 2022

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : CHI/45UC/MNR/2022/0027

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted] : None

Respondent: [redacted] : [RESPONDENT] of application : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : [NAME]

[NAME] [NAME]

Mr [NAME] of decision : 13 June 2022

DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Covid-19 pandemic: Description of determination This has been a remote determination on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined remotely on papers. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in an electronic bundle, the contents of which have been noted. The order made is described below.

Decision of the Tribunal

On 13 June 2022 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £575.00 per calendar month to take effect from 4 April 2022.

Background

1. By way of an application received on the 14 March 2022, the Applicant Tenant of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the Property) referred to the Tribunal an application (the application) referring a notice of increase in rent (the Notice) by the Landlord of the property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).

2. The Notice was dated 1 March 2022 and proposed a new rent of £630.00 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £575.00 per calendar month to take effect from 4 April 2022.

3. The Tenant occupies the Property under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy dated 3 December 2020.

4. On 8 April 2022 the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. No such objections were received. The parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken.

5. The Directions required the Landlord and Tenant to submit their completed statements by 22 April 2022 (Landlord) and 6 May 2022 (Tenant). With the exception of the application form, no submissions were received from either party.

6. The Tribunal reviewed the parties’ submissions and determined that it could fairly and reasonably proceed to a decision on the papers.

7. The matter was determined having regard to the evidence contained in the application.

Law 8. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act the Tribunal are required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy.

3

9. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

10. As stated, and in accord with current Tribunal policy, the Tribunal did not inspect the property, instead relying on the parties’ evidence and viewing the property via online portals.

11. The Property is an ensuite attic bedroom within a three-storey end-terraced house of solid construction with brick faced elevations beneath a pitched and slate roof. The house had been converted into a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) with six letting rooms. Arun District Council website confirms the property is licensed by them as an HMO for 6 persons.

12. The Property is located in a predominantly residential area and within walking distance of local shops, the railway station and seafront.

13. The accommodation comprises a second floor attic bedroom with ensuite bathroom. The kitchen/diner and garden are shared with five other tenants, who each occupy a double bedroom with ensuite bathroom.

14. Included within the rent is council tax, electricity, gas, water, broadband, cleaning and gardening.

15. The Tenant refers to the Property as heated, however the source and control of same is not undisclosed.

16. Furniture, including a double bed, fridge/freezer, chest of drawers, double wardrobe/mirror, bedside table, under counter cupboard and worktop space are provided by the Landlord.

17. As no submissions were received from either party the Tribunal makes an assumption that white goods, carpets and curtains were supplied by the Landlord.

Submissions – Tenant (summarised)

18. In her application form Ms [APPELLANT] referred to:

a. Irregular cleaning; b. Failure by the Landlord to carry out gardening; c. Intermittent heating during 2020-2021; no heating 2021-2022; d. Slow broadband speed; e. Generally satisfactory utilities.

19. No further submissions were filed.

4

Submissions - Landlord

20. None.

Determination

21. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality in particular. It does not take into account the present rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the existing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal cannot take into account the personal circumstances of either the landlord or the tenant.

22. The Tribunal assesses a rent for the property as it is on the day of the determination, disregarding any improvements made by the tenant but taking into account the impact on rental value of disrepair which is not due to a failure of the tenant to comply with the terms of the tenancy.

23. In determining the rent, the Tribunal has regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rents in the wider area. In this instance, neither party submitted any comparable evidence for consideration. Therefore, as an expert Tribunal, the Tribunal relied upon its own knowledge and experience.

24. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that [ADDRESS] as a whole has a Rating of C.

25. The Tribunal noted that Arun District Council maintain a list of licensed HMO properties which is available on their website. The entry relating to the subject property describes the property as a “3 storey bedsit type HMO where cooking facilities are shared. All rooms have exclusive access to their own washing facilities.” The license commenced on 7 October 2019.

26. Having regard to the limited evidence supplied and in the absence of any comparable evidence from either party, the Tribunal, relying on its own expertise of local HMO lettings that include all utilities, determined that the market rent for the subject Property is £575.00 per calendar month.

27. The rent will take effect from 4 April 2022, that being the date specified by the Landlord in the Notice of increase.

[NAME] (Chairman) 13 June 2022

5

RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the market rent based on its own expertise of local HMO lettings, as neither party provided comparable evidence.
  • The Tribunal considered the property's features, including it being an attic bedroom with an ensuite bathroom in a licensed HMO.
  • The rent includes council tax, electricity, gas, water, broadband, cleaning, and gardening.
  • The Tribunal assumed white goods, carpets, and curtains were supplied by the Landlord due to lack of submissions.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's claims of irregular cleaning, lack of gardening, intermittent heating, and slow broadband were noted but did not alter the market rent determination.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a market rent of £575.00 per month for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable properties in the locality and disregarded any improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in the locality.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable properties in the locality when determining a fair market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents related to comparable properties in the locality mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.