Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered comparable properties and previous decisions to set the rent at £5037 per quarter, effective from 23 March 2020.
⚖️ Legal holding
The tribunal must determine the rent at which a property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent at which a willing landlord would expect to let the property on the open market. This decision considers the type of tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the existing tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account comparable properties and previous decisions. The rent was set at £5037 per quarter, effective from 23 March 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2020/0038
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], London, [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] First Floor, Citygate, St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne And Wear, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 5037.00 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 March 2020
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable 0 Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1966
6. Length of the term or rental period quarterly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises A two-bedroom 1st floor flat in a mansion block with partial central heating and no lift
[NAME] of Decision 15 July 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
LON/00BK/MNR/2020/0038
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 15 July 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 15 July 2021
DECISION
2
Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £5037.00 per quarter. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord dated 5 November 2019 proposing a rent increase from £5850 per quarter to £6350 per quarter with effect from 23 March 2020. Background 2. On 5 March 2020 Mr [APPELLANT] on behalf of the tenant, Mr [APPELLANT], made an [NAME] to this tribunal challenging the increase. Directions were originally made on 12 March 2020 setting a hearing date of 1 June 2020. Due to the Covid pandemic this date was vacated and the case was eventually relisted for hearing with the 2021 appeal.
3. The tribunal has received no representations from the landlord.
4. An inspection was not possible on this occasion and the tribunal relied on the evidence provided and the previous decision which was in evidence. There was no appearance by the landlord. In the absence of any other evidence the tribunal relies on the description of the property provided by the tenant’s expert.
The property 5. [ADDRESS] consists of approximately 150 flats in several Mansion blocks between [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] and dates from the early 1900s. There are no gardens or outside space within the flats.
6. The property is a two bedroom located on the 1st floor and there is no lift.
7. The flat is said to be in reasonable condition and the fittings are still the original dating from the time Mr [NAME] moved into the property with his parents in 1966. At that time the property was let as a shell and all furnishings carpets and white goods have been provided by the tenant.
3 8. There is partial central heating with one radiator in the hall and another in the lounge 9. the flat has an area of 793 ft.² of which 591 ft.² relates to the living room bedrooms and kitchen area. The landlord’s evidence 10. The landlord has supplied no evidence. The tenant’s evidence 11. Expert evidence on behalf of the tenant was given by Mr [APPELLANT]. Mr [APPELLANT] has appeared on behalf of the tenant at the hearings for each year from 2016 to 2019. In each of those years the market rent remained at £5850 per quarter based on a rent for the property on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy at £9000 per quarter reduced by 35% to take account of the lack of modernisation, white goods and the terms of the tenancy.
12. The Landlord has served a notice of increase proposing to raise the rent to £6350 per quarter but has provided no evidence.
13. Mr [NAME] has provided details of a number of comparable flats all within the same block. 14. [ADDRESS]
15. This flat was originally let in February 2017 at £8320 per quarter. It was renewed at the same rent in February 2018 in February 2019. In February 2020 the rent reduced to £8125 per quarter and in February 2021 to £7475 per quarter.
16. The flat has an area of 883 ft.². Mr [NAME] has devalued the quarterly rent to arrive at a rent per square foot which he then applies to the area of the subject property to arrive at an equivalent rent for the subject property of £7482 per quarter at February 2019, £7297 per quarter for February 2020 and £6713 per quarter for February 2021.
17. Mr [NAME] has adopted the same methodology for each of the comparables listed in the table below.
4 18.
flat details size rent pq 2019 per sq ft rent pq 2020 psf rent pq 2021 psf 107 App 9 883 8,320.00 £ 9.42 £ 8,125.00 £ 9.20 £ 7,475.00 £ 8.47 £ 21 App 10 893 10,335.00 £ 11.57 £ 10,335.00 £ 11.57 £ 8,775.00 £ 9.83 £ 76 App 10 1109 10,400.00 £ 9.38 £ 9,750.00 £ 8.79 £ 9,100.00 £ 8.21 £ 159 App 12 1000 8,763.00 £ 8.76 £ 8,247.00 £ 8.25 £ 7,732.00 £ 7.73 £ 152 App 13 950 9,100.00 £ 9.58 £ 8,450.00 £ 8.89 £ 7,475.00 £ 7.87 £ 25 App 14 904 9,555.00 £ 10.57 £ 9,555.00 £ 10.57 £ 8,450.00 £ 9.35 £ 127 App 15 743 7,150.00 £ 9.62 £ 7,150.00 £ 9.62 £ 6,500.00 £ 8.75 £ 130 App 16 1154 12,935.00 £ 11.21 £ 11,700.00 £ 10.14 £ 11,050.00 £ 9.58 £ 115 App 17 772 - £ - £ 8,450.00 £ 10.95 £ 6,500.00 £ 8.42 £ 148 App 18 883 - £ - £ 9,230.00 £ 10.45 £ - £ - £ 55 App 19 814 11,999.00 £ 14.74 £ 8,996.00 £ 11.05 £ - £ - £ 106 App 20 881 8,320.00 £ 9.44 £ 7,995.00 £ 9.07 £ - £ - £
19. it can be seen from the table that rents have declined in the market between 2019 and 2020. Mr [NAME] takes an average of the rates per square foot to arrive at an average equivalent rent of £7723 per quarter for 2020 and deducting 35% as in the previous tribunal decisions comes to a revised market rent for 23 March 2020 of £5020 per quarter. The Law 20. The tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
21. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
22. In so doing the tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 23. No rental evidence had been put forward by the landlord.
24. The evidence put forward on behalf of the tenant is substantiated by previous tribunal decisions and letting details of a number of flats of different sizes as shown in column 2 of the table.
5 25. The tribunal has weighed this evidence and also applied its knowledge and experience and places considerable weight on it.
26. Applying a similar methodology of reaching an average rent for the equivalent floor area the tribunal arrives at a headline figure of £7750 per quarter.
27. The tribunal then considered whether the 35% deduction adopted by previous tribunal is still appropriate as argued for by Mr [NAME]. This figure has been adopted by successive tribunals and there is no evidence before the tribunal to suggest it is no longer valid. The tribunal therefore makes a deduction of 35%.
28. This results in a net rent for the subject property of £5037 per quarter Effective date 29. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the [NAME] unless there is hardship to the tenant.
30. The tribunal received no evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is 23 March 2020.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 15 July 2021
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.
6 The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for London Studio Flat at £202.29 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Property in Bournemouth
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,000 pcm by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,300 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,685 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,750 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,800 Per Month by First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the market rent to be £5037.00 per quarter.
- The landlord's notice proposing a rent increase was challenged by the tenant.
- The tribunal relied on the tenant's expert's description of the property.
- The tribunal accepted the 35% deduction from the market rent, as adopted by previous tribunals.
- The effective date for the new rent was set as 23 March 2020.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £5037 per quarter.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable properties and previous decisions, ensuring the rent reflects the open market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the use of comparable properties to determine the market rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who challenged the proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider using comparable properties to argue their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence from comparable properties and previous decisions was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
