Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,180 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after a landlord proposed an increase and the tenant appealed the decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. If the tenant receives a notice of rent increase, they can also apply to the tribunal to challenge the proposed new rent. The tribunal will then decide a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,180 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, following a notice of rent increase by the landlord and subsequent appeal by the tenant under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/24UF/MNR/2023/0286
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 27 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1180.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 November 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 February 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A mid terrace two storey house. 3 bedrooms, living room, kitchen/dining room, ground floor bathroom, rear garden.
[NAME] of Decision 6 February 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/24UF/MNR/2023/0286 Property : 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] : Southernbrook Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
6th February 2024
DECISION
2
Summary of Decision 1. On the 6th February 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,180 per month to take effect from 28th December 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On the 17th November 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,180 per month in place of the existing rent of £900 per month to take effect from the 17th November 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On the 1st December 2023 the Tenant appealed to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 2oth December 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. The tenancy commenced on the 28th February 2018 at a rent of £850 per month for a term of 12 months which terminated on the 27th February 2019.
8. Both parties submitted completed Rent Appeal Statements including comparable evidence and photographs setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.
9. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on the 6th February 2024 based on the written representations received. The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on Rightmove and Google maps, the property comprises a two-storey mid terrace house located in an established residential area amongst comparable dwellings close to local amenities.
11. The accommodation comprises: living room, kitchen/dining room, three bedrooms and a bathroom/WC. There is a rear garden and roadside parking.
3 There is a gas central heating system and double-glazed windows. The landlord provided carpets, curtains and white goods at the commencement of the tenancy. Submissions 12. As previously mentioned, The tenant completed the Rent Appeal Statement and provided a schedule of photographs and stated that there are damp and mould issues, the boiler requires constant maintenance and a poorly fitted window in the dining room. In addition, the tenant provided addresses of two properties which were available for letting at £965 per month and £900 per month respectively. The Tribunal can place little weight on this evidence as no other information was provided.
13. The landlord also submitted a Rent Appeal Statement including a schedule of comparable evidence provided on Rightmove which ranges from £1,200 per month to £1,600 per month. It is stated the kitchen and bathroom are approximately 7 years old.
14. The Energy Performance Rating for the property confirms an energy rating of C. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or
4 (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation 15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
17. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Gosport area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,180 per month.
18. The Tribunal considers the property to be in a condition as would command this rent in its current condition.
19. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
5 Determination 20. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,180 per month. 21. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,180 per week should take effect from 28th December 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice.
[NAME] 6th February 2024
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
6 4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £490 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,300 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
- The rent adjustment takes into account the condition of the property.
- The case is heard and decided by a First-tier Tribunal based on written representations.
- The rent is set at a fair market rate considering the property's condition and local rental trends.
- The rent is adjusted for any deficiencies in the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No significant factors identified that consistently went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,180 per month for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The landlord proposed a rent increase, and the tenant appealed the decision to the Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal reviewed the evidence and determined that the fair market rent for the tenancy was £1,180 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The Tribunal considered the comparable rental prices in the area and the condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who wanted to challenge the proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can appeal a landlord's proposed rent increase to the Tribunal if they believe it is unfair.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, comparable rental prices, and the condition of the property were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for assistance with such cases.
