VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £650/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £650 per month and became effective on 1 April 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, which was applied in this case to determine the monthly rent.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original, except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £650 per month, effective from April 2024.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £650 per month, effective from 1 April 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/47UF/MNR/2024/0045

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT]

[RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £650 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable £30.11 Per Month

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic - Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 – LTA 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord -

9. Description of premises 2 Bed first floor flat with living room, kitchen, bathroom. Communal areas.

[NAME] of Decision 23 May 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal set the rent for the property at £650 per month.
  • The decision on the rent took effect from April 1, 2024.
  • An amount of £30.11 per month was included for services.
  • The tenancy was a periodic monthly agreement.
  • The landlord was liable for repairs under Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £650 per month, effective from April 2024.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £650 per month, following the provisions of the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.