VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy Considering Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy, considering the state of the property, which was found to be in only fair condition with some issues.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy set by the Tribunal, taking into account the condition of the premises.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determinationproperty condition assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the condition of the premises and disregards certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy and assessed the condition of the premises.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition of the premises, which was described as being in only fair condition with several defects.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UK/MNR/2023/0422

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Tribunal members were 24, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

J R RIMMER J FAULKNER

Landlord [RESPONDENT]

30, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £375.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22nd September 2023

*3. The amount included for services is Not applicable

4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 22nd January 2020

5. Rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs

AS PER LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

NIL

9. Description of premises Ground floor flat in large, terraced house. Accommodation comprises communal hallway, lounge, bedroom, kitchen and shower room. The property is in only fair condition with defective kitchen units, insecure electric fire and extensive brickwork and vegetation issues in yard.

Chairman J R RIMMER Date of Decision 7th March 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy set by the Tribunal.
  • The Tribunal must consider the condition of the property when setting the rent.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

They considered the condition of the premises and set the rent accordingly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was used to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the premises played a significant role in setting the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Descriptions of the property condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.