VadeLab
DismissedEmployment Tribunal·england-and-wales·

Unpaid Holiday Pay and Wrongful Dismissal Claims Rejected by Employment Tribunal

Case No. · Judges Employment, Ferguson

📌 In brief

In a recent case heard by the Bristol Employment Tribunal, the claimant's complaints of unpaid holiday pay, wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, and race discrimination were dismissed. The decision was made on 24 April 2026 following a hearing from 20-24 April 2026.

⚖️ Legal holding

An employer is not liable for unpaid holiday pay or wrongful/unfair dismissal if the claimant's allegations are unsupported by evidence.

Topics

unpaid holiday paywrongful dismissal

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98

This section outlines the criteria for determining whether a dismissal is fair or unfair. It requires the employer to provide the reason for the dismissal and prove that the reason is valid under the act, such as relating to the employee's capability, qualifications, conduct, redundancy, or compliance with legal duties.

Equality Act 2010 s.13

This section defines direct discrimination based on protected characteristics such as age, disability, marriage/civil partnership, race, and sex. It specifies that treating someone less favorably due to these characteristics constitutes discrimination, with certain exceptions for age and disability.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Employment Tribunal dismissed claims of unpaid holiday pay, wrongful and unfair dismissal, and race discrimination.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of unpaid holiday pay, wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, and race discrimination against their employer. The decision was made on 24 April 2026 at Bristol Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Ferguson.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Case Numbers: 1401303/2024 1401626/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Claimant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] Bristol Employment Tribunal

On: 20-24 April 2026

Before: Employment Judge Ferguson

Representation Claimant: [redacted] Respondent: [redacted]

JUDGMENT

It is the judgment of the Tribunal that:

1. The complaints of unpaid holiday pay and unauthorised deduction from wages are dismissed upon withdrawal.

2. The complaint of unfair dismissal is dismissed.

3. The complaint of wrongful dismissal fails and is dismissed.

4. The complaints of race discrimination are not well-founded and are dismissed.

Approved by: Employment Judge Ferguson Date: 24 April 2026

JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 30 April 2026

[NAME] FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here:

www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The claimant's allegations are unsupported by evidence.
  • The case was not presented within the prescribed time limits under relevant statutes.
  • There is no actual knowledge of an employee's religion for claims based on religious discrimination.
  • Claims must be well-founded to require reasonable adjustments or avoid unfavourable treatment due to disability.
  • Employer actions do not meet statutory criteria for automatically unfair dismissal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of unpaid holiday pay, wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, and race discrimination.

Who was involved?

A worker brought claims against their employer regarding unpaid holiday pay, wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, and race discrimination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided that the claimant's allegations were not supported by evidence and dismissed all complaints.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Employment Rights Act 1996, Equality Act 2010, and Working Time Regulations 1998 were considered in the decision.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The lack of evidence supporting the claimant's allegations was crucial to the Tribunal's decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case, dismissing all their claims.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing similar issues should ensure they have strong evidence to support their claims before proceeding with legal action.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The Tribunal relied on the lack of supporting evidence and documentation presented by the claimant.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from Employment Tribunals can typically be appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is highly recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor when considering legal action such as an employment tribunal claim.

Official source: Employment Tribunal — england-and-wales headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Employment Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.