Section 1179FC — Corporation Tax Act 2009: British certification condition: provisional and final satisfaction
Text of the provision Official document
British certification condition: provisional and final satisfaction 1179FC 1 In this section, references to a certificate are to a certificate under section 1179FF .
2 A video game meets the British certification condition in a pre-completion period (see section 1179FQ ) if the production company’s company tax return for the period is accompanied by a valid interim certificate.
3 A video game meets the British certification condition in the completion period (see section 1179FQ ) and any subsequent accounting period if—
a the production company’s company tax return for the completion period is accompanied by a valid final certificate, or b the production company has abandoned production activities in relation to the video game and the production company’s company tax return for the completion period is accompanied by a valid interim certificate.
4 Subsections (2) and (3) are subject to subsections (5) and (6) .
5 If a video game does not meet the British certification condition in the completion period, it is no longer to be regarded as having done so (nor, therefore, as being a qualifying video game) in any pre-completion period.
6 If a certificate is revoked after the production company’s company tax return for a period is submitted , the video game in question is no longer to be regarded as having met the British certification condition (nor, therefore, as being a qualifying video game) in that period in reliance on that certificate.
7 Subsection (6) does not apply to the extent that a direction under section 1179FF provides that the certificate is to be treated as having effect.
8 For the purposes of this section, a certificate is valid if it has effect on the day on which the production company’s company tax return is submitted.
Official source: legislation.gov.uk
Search case law on this topic
See judgments from UK courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.
Explore case law →