
Administrative judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
A person successfully challenged a decision by an authority to approve new pharmacy premises because the required distance from other pharmacies was incorrectly measured. This led to the approval being overturned and sent back for further consideration.
In this case, the Federal Court denied the claimant's request to extend time for filing an appeal from a previous decision. The judge ruled that since the earlier decision would likely have no impact on the final outcome of the case, there was no need to grant leave to appeal.
The Full Federal Court of Australia has upheld a person laws regulating betting activities, ruling they do not violate constitutional protections for a person trade. The court found the provisions were reasonably necessary to promote a a person a person without unfairly discriminating against businesses from other a person or territories.
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal denied a request for access to documents related to a specific workers' compensation claim. The denial was based on exclusions under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009.
In this case, the Federal Court allowed the claimant to use specific documents from one legal case in another related case due to special circumstances that justified it. This decision ensures fair proceedings while balancing the need for confidentiality and fairness.
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal found two solicitors guilty of professional misconduct for publishing advertisements that violated the Advertising Regulations 2005 and the Workers Compensation Regulation 2003. The solicitors were found to have breached these regulations multiple times.
In this case, an employee challenged the Commissioner of Taxation's decision regarding her termination payment not being a genuine redundancy payment. The Federal Court found that the claimant did not identify any legal errors or procedural unfairness and dismissed the appeal.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant's request to overturn an order because there was no evidence showing it was unjust and the claimant waited too long to file the application.
The Federal Court approved the payment of $1,162,684.01 as part of the 'Administration Costs' under a Settlement Distribution Scheme. The court ensured that these costs were fair and reasonable for all involved parties.