VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·21 Apr 2005

Nominal Damages Do Not Constitute Victory for Claimant in Costs Determination

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·20 Apr 2005

Will Interpretation: Understanding the Gift Over Clause

Allowed in PartCourt of Appeal (NSW)·12 Apr 2005

Medical Negligence Case Partially Allowed by NSW Court of Appeal

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·01 Apr 2005

Transfer of Poker Machine Entitlements Requires Lessor's Consent

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·23 Mar 2005

Fourth Respondent's Application to Strike Out Rejected

In this case, the Federal Court rejected an attempt by the a person party involved in a dispute to have the legal claims against them dismissed. The court found that the claims presented enough evidence to proceed with a trial.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·22 Mar 2005

Appeal Dismissed: Unconscionable Dealings Requires Proving Special Disadvantage

The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal regarding unconscionable dealings, ruling that the claimant did not prove a special disadvantage affecting her ability to judge her best interests. The case highlights the importance of demonstrating a significant disadvantage in such claims.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·18 Mar 2005

Parking Easement Claim Rejected by NSW Supreme Court

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 Mar 2005

Order for Specific Performance Granted in Land Sale Contract Case

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·11 Mar 2005

Federal Court Sets Aside Multiple Bankruptcy Notices for Abuse of Process

In this case, a a person challenged a bankruptcy notice issued by a person, claiming it was unfair to issue multiple notices after setting aside an earlier one. The Federal Court agreed that such conduct is an abuse of process and ruled in favour of the a person.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·17 Feb 2005

Appeal Dismissed in Mortgage Dispute Involving Accessary Liability

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·15 Feb 2005

Federal Court: Omission in Bankruptcy Notice Does Not Invalidate It

In this case, a person Federal Court ruled that a bankruptcy notice can still be valid even if it does not include all required notes as long as there is no significant harm to a person person who received a person notice. This decision clarifies a person requirements for issuing a bankruptcy notice in Australia.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·09 Feb 2005

Claimant Ordered to Pay Respondent's Appeal Costs, Excluding Senior Counsel

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·29 Dec 2004

Provisional Liquidation Ordered Due to Management Breakdown

OtherSupreme Court of New South Wales·03 Dec 2004

Accounting Issues Between Former Partners Referred to Liquidator

In a dispute between former partners, the NSW Supreme Court decided to refer all remaining issues to a chartered accountant/liquidator for resolution. This includes accounting issues and disputes over fiduciary duties.

Struck OutFederal Court of Australia·29 Nov 2004

Statement of Claim Struck Out for Inadequate Pleading, Leave Given to Amend

In this case, the Federal Court struck out a statement of claim because it was not properly prepared according to legal standards. The court allowed the claimant to file an amended version by December 23, 2004, and suggested mediation as part of resolving the dispute.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·15 Nov 2004

Insurer Allowed to Join Proceedings Against Plaintiff

In this case, the insurer was allowed to join legal proceedings to argue that it had no obligation to pay compensation to the plaintiff under a CTP insurance policy. Despite the plaintiff's efforts to keep his options open, the court ruled in favour of the insurer and granted it costs.

RefusedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·10 Nov 2004

Leave to Appeal Refused in Defamation Case Involving Jury Selection

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·10 Nov 2004

Without Prejudice Documents Cannot Be Used for Forensic Purposes

In a legal case, the court decided that documents marked 'without prejudice' cannot be used for forensic purposes during trials. This ruling is based on the Supreme Court Act 1970, which protects these types of communications.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 Oct 2004

Email Maintains Legal Professional Privilege in NSW Supreme Court Case

In this case, the court decided that an email is still protected by legal professional privilege and cannot be inspected. The email was sent to collect information for a lawsuit.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·08 Oct 2004

Supreme Court Rejects Request to Invalidate Business Loan

← PreviousPage 32 · 833 judgmentsNext →
General & Other — Case law | VadeLab