
General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The court looked at whether partial disclosure of private legal discussions waives the right to keep those discussions confidential. The court ruled that just disclosing that legal advice was given, without revealing the advice itself, does not waive the right to confidentiality.
The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal that sought to reinterpret section 170 of the Police Act 1990. The court ruled that interpreting this section was irrelevant to the core issue of whether the claimant had suffered a compensable psychological injury.
In this case, the claimant sought damages for breach of a lease covenant and entitlement to machinery. The court found the claimant partially successful and ordered them to pay 60% of the respondent's costs.
The claimant tried to get a lease changed because they thought there was a mistake regarding GST inclusion. However, the court decided that just suspecting a mistake wasn't enough; there needed to be clear proof of an error. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
In this case, the court ruled that the plaintiff must pay 50% of the costs associated with discovery and document production issues because of mistakes made during the discovery process.
The plaintiff asked the court to overturn a decision on costs made by a local court magistrate and to get costs from the defendants. The court allowed the appeal to proceed but ultimately rejected it, upholding the lower court's decision on costs orders.
The claimant sued for damages after terminating a contract but failed to show that they took reasonable steps to reduce their losses. The court decided that the claimant was not entitled to any damages because they did not properly mitigate their losses.
The NSW Supreme Court decided to limit the use of a valuation report because the valuer who prepared it was unavailable for cross-examination. This decision was made to adhere to the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
The NSW Supreme Court ordered the winding up of solvent companies after finding that there was a breakdown in relations between the parties and it was just and equitable to do so, according to the Corporations Act 2001.
the address of Appeal granted leave to appeal, set aside a lower court decision and remitted the matter for trial due to issues with the respondent's awareness of personal injury and its connection to the claimant's acts or omissions. The case involved an application under s 60G of the Limitation Act 1969.
In this case, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal regarding a default judgment. The court emphasised the importance of providing a defense on the merits, meaning the defendant must show that there is a genuine defense to the claims made against them. The case involved allegations of misappropriation of funds and false documentation.