VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·18 Nov 2003

Directors win defamation case over property sale lies

RefusedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 Nov 2003

Discharge Application Denied in Defamation and False Imprisonment Case

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 Nov 2003

Contract Not Frustrated Due to Temporary Inability

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·24 Oct 2003

Statutory Demand Set Aside Due to Genuine Disputes in Plumbing Contract Case

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 Sept 2003

Compensation Awarded for Paraplegia Caused by Workplace Accident

Allowed in PartSupreme Court of New South Wales·01 Sept 2003

Increase in Legal Expenses Allowed, Specific Fund Access Denied

OtherSupreme Court of New South Wales·21 Aug 2003

Security for Costs Ordered for Plaintiff Residing Outside State

In a defamation case, the NSW Supreme Court ordered the plaintiff to provide security for the defendant's costs in the amount of $40,000. The plaintiff resided outside the state, leading to the court's decision to require security for costs.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·01 Aug 2003

Legal Professional Privilege in Subpoena Cases

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·01 Aug 2003

Federal Court Decision on Legal Professional Privilege

This case involves a dispute about whether certain documents are protected by legal professional privilege. The Federal Court of Australia ruled that the party seeking to maintain this privilege was entitled to do so if the communications were made for obtaining legal advice or preparing for legal proceedings.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·24 July 2003

Appeal Dismissed: Legal Representation Not Found Negligent

A self-represented litigant appealed a decision claiming negligence in legal representation. The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's ruling that the solicitor's actions were not negligent.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·23 July 2003

NSW Court of Appeal Rejects Extension of Limitation Period for Hearing Loss Claim

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·01 July 2003

Federal Court Orders Shareholder and Optionholder Meetings

The Federal Court ordered an online retailer to hold meetings for its shareholders and optionholders. These meetings are part of a plan to move the company's headquarters from Australia to the USA, affecting how shares and options are managed.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·18 June 2003

Federal Court Upholds Legal Professional Privilege Over Compelled Documents

In this case, the Federal Court ruled in favour of a company's claim to a person over certain documents it had been compelled by law to produce. This decision confirms that companies can maintain confidentiality for privileged communications even when forced to hand them over under statutory requirements.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·05 June 2003

NSW Court of Appeal Upholds Decision Against Road Authority Over Hazardous Barrier

The NSW Court of Appeal ruled that a local council was negligent for not removing a dangerous barrier on a public footpath. The barrier, a low crossbar, caused a pedestrian to fall and sustain injuries.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 June 2003

Notice of Rescission Must Be Clear and Timely

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·23 May 2003

Appellant's Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissed

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·23 May 2003

Federal Court Upholds Customer Authorisation for Casino to Appropriate Funds

The Federal Court of Australia decided that a customer's authorisation for a casino to appropriate funds towards reducing an outstanding credit facility is valid if given in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The court dismissed the claimant's arguments regarding the validity of the listing as a defaulter.

OtherCourt of Appeal (NSW)·22 May 2003

Costs of Appeal Ordered on Indemnity Basis Due to Offer of Compromise

The Court of Appeal ruled that the appellant must pay the costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis because the respondent's offer of compromise was significantly lower than the final verdict obtained at trial. The decision was influenced by the principles governing indemnity costs in appeals and the impact of offers of compromise made during the trial.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·29 Apr 2003

Appeal Allowed: Injury Not Caused By Vehicle Defect

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·13 Mar 2003

Claimant Establishes Constructive Trust Over Matrimonial Home in Bankruptcy Case

In this case, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that a spouse can establish a constructive trust over their matrimonial home if they made substantial financial and non-financial contributions. This prevents the property from being divided among creditors in bankruptcy proceedings.

← PreviousPage 34 · 833 judgmentsNext →