VadeLab

Federal Court of Australia case law

Judgments from the Federal Court of Australia with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·03 Aug 1995

Claimant Wins Copyright Case Over Building Designs

In this case, the Federal Court ruled that the claimant had proven ownership of copyright for specific building designs and structures. As a result, the court found that the respondents had infringed upon these rights by reproducing elements of those designs in their own buildings. The decision entitles the claimant to an account of any profits made from such infringements.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·28 July 1988

Successful Misleading Conduct Claim Under Trade Practices Act

A property seller was accused of making false claims about a a person's capabilities during sales negotiations. The buyer claimed these statements were misleading and violated trade practices laws. The Federal Court agreed with the buyer, finding the seller guilty of misleading conduct in trade and commerce.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·20 Feb 1987

Property Transfer Voided in Bankruptcy Case

The Federal Court ruled that a property transfer made by a a person person was invalid because it lacked genuine intentions and aimed to hide assets from creditors. This decision protects the rights of creditors and ensures fair bankruptcy proceedings.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·10 Apr 1986

Federal Court Sets Aside Default Judgments in Civil Litigation Case

In this case, an appellant successfully appealed against default judgments obtained by respondents due to significant delays in filing defences. The Federal Court found that despite the delay, there were valid reasons for setting aside the judgments as no prejudice was shown and a defence existed on the merits.

Struck OutFederal Court of Australia·15 Mar 1985

Federal Court Dismisses Cross-Claim Against Solicitors for Lack of Jurisdiction

In this case, the Federal Court dismissed a cross-claim filed by one party against their solicitors. The court ruled that it lacked the authority to hear such claims unless they directly relate to disputes between existing parties in the main proceeding.

Allowed in PartFederal Court of Australia·08 Feb 1985

Federal Court Rules on Joinder and Amended Pleadings

In this case, the Federal Court addressed whether a party improperly joined in proceedings could be dismissed from them. The court reviewed the rules governing joinder and amendments to pleadings.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·22 Nov 1983

Federal Court Rejects Claimant’s Judicial Review of Broadcasting Tribunal

In this case, a company applied to have decisions made by the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal reviewed in court. However, their request was denied because the court determined that even if an application is submitted late, it can still comply with legal requirements.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·24 May 1983

Federal Court Rejects Debtor’s Bankruptcy Opposition Due to Procedural Issues

In this case, a a person tried to stop a a person from declaring them bankrupt but was unsuccessful because they did not follow the correct procedures or provide enough proof. This highlights the importance of adhering to legal rules when opposing bankruptcy petitions.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·05 May 1981

Federal Court Allows Joinder of Additional Defendants and Amendment

In this case, the Federal Court allowed the claimant to add a person to the lawsuit and make changes to their legal claims. This decision was based on the need to fully resolve the issues at hand under relevant court rules.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·28 Mar 1980

Court Rejects Injunction to Block Dealership Termination

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·20 Dec 1979

Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Union Election Irregularities

← PreviousPage 22 · 431 judgments
Federal Court of Australia case law | VadeLab