NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Appeal Panel) case law
Judgments from the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Appeal Panel) with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.
Appeal Allowed: Tribunal's Order Amendment Reversed Due to Procedural Unfairness
Appeal Upheld Due to Inadequate Reasons and Significant New Evidence
NSW Appeal Panel Allows Appeal Due to Insufficient Reasoning on Statutory Guarantees
The a person allowed an appeal because the lower Tribunal did not provide sufficient reasons when deciding on a claim involving defective goods sold without statutory guarantees under the a person. This led to the case being remanded for re-determination by another panel.
Tribunal Allows Appeal on Site Fee Increase Formula
Consumer Claim Rejected: Services Failed to Achieve Intended Outcome
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed an appeal, confirming the original ruling that a service provider was not entitled to payment for services that did not improve a bore's performance due to undisclosed risks.
Tenant Entitled to Mental Distress and Aggravated Damages Due to Breach of Contract
Privacy Complaint Appeal Dismissed by NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Travel Agent Not Liable for Refunds Due to Frustration
NSW Appeal Dismissed: Delay and Lack of New Evidence
Tribunal dismisses appeal over summonses legitimacy
Tenant's Appeal Against Consent Orders Dismissed
Holiday Accommodation Lease Subject to Residential Tenancies Act
Partial Success in Appeal Results in Cost Allocation
The claimant appealed certain decisions and won some parts of the appeal but lost others. As a result, the court ordered the respondent to pay the claimant 20% of her costs associated with the appeal.
Tenant Loses Appeal Over Rent Arrears in NSW Tribunal
Tribunal Rejects Appeal on Child Protection Decisions
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed an appeal brought by the claimant regarding decisions on child protection, including the removal of a child and the cancellation of an authorisation. The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to review these decisions and that the claims were frivolous.