Supreme Court of New South Wales case law
Judgments from the Supreme Court of New South Wales with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.
Claimant's Property Title Restored in NSW Supreme Court
Client Legal Privilege Waived Through Voluntary Disclosure
Corporate Insolvency and Winding-Up Procedures Explained
Claimant Granted Judgment for Possession of Land Despite Farm Debt Mediation Act Arguments
Supreme Court Rejects Additional Expert Evidence
The Supreme Court of New South Wales refused to accept new expert evidence after a single expert had already been appointed. This decision was based on the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules.
Will Construction and Superannuation Entitlements in NSW Supreme Court
In this case, the Court decided that superannuation entitlements are not considered 'financial accounts' under the will's clause 3(b). This decision affects how the estate is distributed among the beneficiaries.
Challenging Costs Assessments and Determinations in NSW
Reconstruction Video Rejected in Murder Case
Appeal Allowed: Agency Error in Lower Court Decision
Consent Timing Upheld in Conspiracy Charges
Mortgagee Granted Possession of Mortgaged Property in NSW Supreme Court Case
NSW Supreme Court Orders Half Costs Payment in Partially Successful Claim
Proceedings on Distribution of Proceeds from Reinsurance Agreement
NSW Supreme Court Declares Binding Agreement and Orders Specific Performance
The NSW Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff and defendant had entered into a binding agreement for the transportation of export goods. The court declared the agreement valid and ordered the defendant to fulfill the terms of the agreement.
Landlord Unreasonably Withheld Lease Assignment Consent
The court found that the landlord unreasonably refused consent to the assignment of a lease. The plaintiffs, who were tenants, wanted to assign their lease to new buyers. The court determined that the new buyers were competent and financially capable, and therefore the landlord's refusal was unreasonable.