VadeLab

Supreme Court of New South Wales case law

Judgments from the Supreme Court of New South Wales with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 Oct 2006

Supreme Court Denies Access to Confidential Documents Related to National Security

In this case, the court denied access to confidential documents related to national security concerns. The decision was made to protect national security and maintain confidentiality.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·06 Oct 2006

Costs of Winding Up Partnership Decided by NSW Supreme Court

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·06 Oct 2006

Summary Judgment Motion Against Solicitor Dismissed

The Supreme Court of New South Wales dismissed a motion for summary judgment against a solicitor because the procedural defaults that were initially made had been corrected.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·22 Sept 2006

Liquidator Allowed to Adjust Asset Distribution Based on Debts Owed

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Aug 2006

Registrar's Authority to Examine Subpoena Answers

In this case, the Supreme Court clarified that a Registrar has the authority to hear examinations regarding the adequacy of answers to subpoenas for document production, ensuring proper compliance with these legal requests.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Aug 2006

Trustee Seeks Court Guidance on Protecting Brain-Damaged Minor's Estate

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·15 Aug 2006

Supreme Court Allows Amended Statement of Claim Including Pre-1996 Events

The Supreme Court of New South Wales allowed a plaintiff to amend their statement of claim to include events prior to 1996. This decision overturned a previous registrar's ruling and allows the plaintiff to argue that their employer should have been aware of their pre-existing vulnerability to psychiatric injury.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 July 2006

Spouse Receives Entire Estate Under Family Provision Act

The claimant asked for a share of the deceased's estate under the Family Provision Act 1982. The NSW Supreme Court ruled that the claimant should receive the entire estate because the deceased did not make adequate provision for the claimant's needs.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·06 July 2006

Limitation Period Extended for Psychological Injury Claim

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 June 2006

Claimant Awarded $20,000 From Step-Mother’s Estate Under Family Provision Act

Associate Justice McLaughlin awarded the claimant $20,000 from his late stepmother's estate under the Family Provision Act 1982, ruling that the claimant had not been adequately provided for.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 June 2006

Injunction Ensures Compliance with Drag Racing Rules

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·24 May 2006

License Suspension Not Considered 'Closure' Under Insurance Policy

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·22 May 2006

Supreme Court Dismisses Abuse of Process Claim in Family Law Proceedings

The Supreme Court dismissed an application to transfer proceedings from the District Court to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that starting new proceedings in the Supreme Court covering the same subject matter as existing District Court proceedings is an abuse of process. The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 May 2006

Winding Up Terminated After Creditors' Trust Established

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 May 2006

Request for Estate Provision Under Family Provision Act Rejected

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·03 May 2006

Claimant Granted Provision from Estate Under Family Provision Act

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 Apr 2006

Adjournment Granted for Plaintiff to Review Extensive Evidence

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·30 Mar 2006

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand Rejected Due to Insufficient Quantification

The court rejected an application to cancel a statutory demand because the applicant did not provide enough detail about the disputed amount. The case highlights the importance of providing a clear and quantifiable offsetting claim when challenging a statutory demand.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·30 Mar 2006

Contract Interpretation in Commercial Agreements

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Mar 2006

Proprietary Estoppel Upheld in Family Provision Case

← PreviousPage 29 · 724 judgmentsNext →
Supreme Court of New South Wales case law | VadeLab