VadeLab
AllowedFederal Court of Australia·

Federal Court Allows Trustee to Wind Up Bankrupt Shareholder’s Company

Case No. [2015] FCA 947 · Justice Wigney

📌 In brief

In this case, a trustee sought to become officially recognised as the holder of shares in a company after those shares were transferred due to bankruptcy proceedings. The court agreed that the trustee should be registered as the shareholder and granted permission for the company to be wound up on just and equitable grounds.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under s 1072C of the Corporations Act, a trustee of a bankrupt's estate is entitled to be registered as the holder of shares that have vested in them under s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act.

📖 What the law says

Bankruptcy Act 1966 s.58

When a debtor becomes bankrupt, their property, excluding after-acquired property, immediately vests in the Official Trustee or a registered trustee if appointed under section 156A. After-acquired property also vests in the trustee as soon as it is acquired by or devolves on the bankrupt.

Corporations Act 2001 s.175

A company or a person aggrieved can apply to the Court to correct a register kept by the company. If the Court orders the correction, it may also order compensation for any loss or damage suffered by the applicant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a legal practitioner.

📖 Technical summary

A trustee sought to be registered as the holder of shares in a company to wind it up, overcoming issues due to missing records and non-appearance of parties.

📜 Headnote Official document

A trustee sought orders that shares in a company vested due to bankruptcy would be registered under their name and the company wound up on just and equitable grounds. The Court declared the shares had vested in the trustee, ordered correction of the register of members, and allowed winding up.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

[NAME] (Trustee), in the matter of [NAME] v [COMPANY] ([NAME]) (No 2) [2015] FCA 947 Citation: [NAME] (Trustee), in the matter of [NAME] v [COMPANY] ([NAME]) (No 2) [2015] FCA 947

Parties: [NAME] AS TRUSTEE OF THE [NAME] OF [NAME] v [COMPANY] ([NAME]) (ACN [PHONE]) AND ANOR

File number: NSD 316 of 2014

Judge: WIGNEY J

Date of judgment: 27 August 2015

Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where shares in a company vests in the trustee pursuant to s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – rights of a trustee of the estate of a [NAME] – rights of a trustee of the estate of a [NAME] – right of a trustee to become registered as shareholder of the company – correction or rectification of the register of members – standing of trustee in bankruptcy of [NAME] to apply to wind up the company on just and equitable terms

Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 58(1)(b), 121 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 175, 461(1)(k), 462(2), 1072C(1), 1072C(2)

Cases cited: [NAME] v [COMPANY] (NSW) [COMPANY] (2009) 76 ACSR 13; [2009] FCA 1364 [NAME] v [COMPANY] (1950) 82 CLR 1 [COMPANY] v [COMPANY] (1996) 20 ACSR 553; (1996) 14 ACLC 1089 Re [COMPANY] [1956] Ch 577 Re [COMPANY] [2012] NSWSC 1639 [NAME] (Trustee), in the matter of [NAME] v [COMPANY] ([NAME]) [2015] FCA 517

Date of hearing: 15 July 2015 and 19 August 2015

Place: [APPELLANT]: GENERAL DIVISION

Category: Catchwords

Number of paragraphs: 24

Counsel for the Applicant: [redacted]

Solicitor for the Applicant: [redacted]

Counsel for the Respondents: [redacted]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA [APPELLANT] 316 of 2014

IN THE MATTER OF THE [NAME] OF [NAME] [NAME]: [NAME] AS TRUSTEE OF THE [NAME] OF [NAME]

Applicant

AND: [COMPANY] ([NAME]) (ACN [PHONE]) AND ANOR

Respondents

[APPELLANT] OF ORDER: 27 AUGUST 2015 [APPELLANT]

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

1. Pursuant to s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the 100 ordinary shares in [COMPANY] have vested in [NAME] as trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME].

2. Pursuant to s 1072C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), [NAME] as trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME] is entitled to be registered as the holder of 100 ordinary shares in [COMPANY]. THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Pursuant to s 175 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the register of members of [COMPANY] be corrected to record that the shares presently registered in the name of [NAME] be registered in the name of [NAME] as trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME], such order to take effect nunc pro tunc. 2. [COMPANY] [PHONE] be wound up pursuant to s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). 3. [NAME] of [NAME] be appointed [NAME] of [APPELLANT].

4. The applicant's costs of this application be taxed and paid out of the assets of [COMPANY]. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA [APPELLANT] 316 of 2014

IN THE MATTER OF THE [NAME] OF [NAME]: [NAME] AS TRUSTEE OF THE [NAME] OF [NAME]

Applicant

AND: [COMPANY] ([NAME]) (ACN [PHONE]) AND ANOR

Respondents

JUDGE: WIGNEY J DATE: 27 AUGUST 2015 PLACE: [APPELLANT] FOR

JUDGMENT 1 Mr [APPELLANT] (the Trustee) is the trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME]. As a result of orders made by the Court on 13 April 2015, 100 shares in a company, [COMPANY] ([NAME]), were transferred to Mr [NAME]. Those shares then vested in the Trustee pursuant to s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The Trustee now seeks orders, the effect of which will be that he will become the registered holder of the shares in [NAME] and will therefore have standing to apply, and will apply, to have [NAME] wound up. The Trustee's ultimate objective is to realise the assets of [NAME] for the benefit of its creditors (if any) and the creditors of Mr [NAME] as [NAME] shareholder of [NAME]. 2 The route that the Trustee must take through the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to achieve his objective is, unfortunately and surprisingly, somewhat tortuous. The complicating fact is that both Mr [NAME] and his former wife, Ms [NAME], who is the [NAME] director and secretary of [NAME], have gone to ground. There does not appear to be any books and records of the company and, most significantly, no register of shareholders has been able to be located. In these circumstances, how is the Trustee to become registered as the holder of the shares with standing to apply to wind up the company? 3 For the reasons that follow, despite the complexities, the Trustee is entitled to the relief that he seeks, including an order that the register of members be corrected and, ultimately, an order that [NAME] be wound up.

Background 4 The relevant factual background is detailed in the judgment pursuant to which Ms [NAME] was ordered to transfer 100 shares in [NAME] to Mr [NAME]: [NAME] (Trustee), in the matter of [NAME] v [COMPANY] ([NAME]) [2015] FCA 517. It is unnecessary to rehearse those background facts here. It is sufficient to note the following. 5 First, the order that Ms [NAME] transfer the shares to Mr [NAME] was consequent upon a declaration that an earlier transfer of the shares by Mr [NAME] to Ms [NAME] was void against the Trustee by reason of s 121 of the Bankruptcy Act. 6 Second, whilst Ms [NAME] initially defended the Trustee's application to have the shares transferred to Mr [NAME], ultimately neither she nor Mr [NAME] appeared in opposition to the declaration and order sought by the Trustee. Nor have they appeared in respect of the Trustee's current application, despite the considerable efforts that have been made by the Trustee to serve them with the relevant documentation. 7 Third, [NAME] has an asset, namely monies that have been paid into the Supreme Court of New South Wales by receivers that had been appointed to [NAME] by a secured creditor. The monies represent the balance of monies received by the receivers following the sale of real estate previously owned by [NAME] after the payment of the secured debt. [NAME] otherwise appears to be dormant. Its [NAME] shareholder, Mr [NAME], is [NAME] and its [NAME] director and secretary, Ms [NAME], appears to reside overseas and to have no ongoing role in the management of the company.

the trUstee's standing to wind up [NAME] 8 The Trustee applies for an order that [NAME] be wound up on just and equitable grounds pursuant to s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act. The difficulty is that, without further order, the Trustee does not have standing to apply for [NAME] to be wound up on that basis. 9 Section 462(2) of the Corporations Act contains a list of persons who may apply for an order to wind up a company. The list includes a "contributory". A "contributory" in relation to a company is defined in s 9 of the Corporations Act as including, relevantly, a holder of fully paid shares in the company. 10 Upon the transfer of the shares back to Mr [NAME] (a transfer that has now been recorded by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission), the shares vested in the Trustee pursuant to s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act. That does not mean that the Trustee is the holder of the shares with standing to apply for the winding up of the company. To achieve that position, he must become the registered holder of the shares: Re [COMPANY] [1956] Ch 577. 11 But how does the Trustee become the registered holder of the shares?

Correction of the register 12 Section 1072C of the Corporations Act sets out the rights of a trustee of the estate of a [NAME]. Subsections 1072C(1) and (2) relevantly provide as follows: (1) If: (a) because of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, a share in a company, being part of the property of a [NAME], vests in the trustee of the [NAME]'s estate; and (b) the [NAME] is the registered holder of that share; this section applies whether or not the trustee has been registered as the holder of the share. (2) On producing such information as the company's directors properly require, the trustee is entitled to: (a) the same dividends and other benefits; and (b) the same rights, for example, but without limitation, rights in relation to: (i) meetings of the company; or (ii) documents, including notices of such meetings; or (iii) voting; or (iv) inspection of the company's records; as the [NAME] would be entitled to if he or she were not a [NAME]. 13 It follows that the Trustee is entitled to the same rights as Mr [NAME] would be entitled to if he was not a [NAME]. Those rights would include the right to be registered as the holder of the 100 shares transferred to him following the orders of the Court made on 13 April 2015. 14 The Trustee has led evidence that he has sought to be registered as the holder of the 100 shares by writing to Ms [NAME], as [NAME] [NAME] director and company secretary, at each of her known addresses. The Trustee's efforts have been to no avail. Ms [NAME] has apparently refused or neglected to take any steps to register the Trustee as the holder of the 100 shares. 15 The Trustee has also endeavoured to locate [NAME]'s register of members, again to no avail. 16 Section 175(1) of the Corporations Act relevantly provides that "… a person aggrieved may apply to the Court to have a register kept by the company … under this Part [Part 2C.1] corrected." One of the registers to be kept under Part 2C.1 of the Corporations Act is a register of members: Corporations Act, s 169. The Trustee is a "person aggrieved" because he is entitled to be recorded in the register of members of [NAME] as the holder of the 100 shares by reason of Mr [NAME] bankruptcy, s 58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act, and s 1072C(2) of the Corporations Act: [NAME] v [COMPANY] (NSW) [COMPANY] (2009) 76 ACSR 13; [2009] FCA 1364 ([NAME] v [NAME]) at [17]. That is all the more so given that the director and the company secretary of [NAME] is either refusing or neglecting to register the Trustee as the holder of those shares. 17 The difficulty here is that no register has been located. How then can it be corrected? There is some authority that the Court can create a register so as to correct it. In [COMPANY] [2012] NSWSC 1639 at [7], [NAME] noted that whilst s 175(1) of the Corporations Act does not confer a power to create a register, it assumes that the Court already has such a power at general law. His Honour referred, in that context, to [COMPANY] v [COMPANY] (1996) 20 ACSR 553; (1996) 14 ACLC 1089 at 1094 and [NAME] v [COMPANY] (1950) 82 CLR 1 at 51, and the general law power to rectify a register. 18 [NAME] reference to these authorities and the general law power to rectify is a bit puzzling as these authorities do not appear to involve the creation of a register. Nor does it appear to have been necessary for his Honour, in the case he was deciding, to order that a register be created. Nevertheless, the power in s 175 of the Corporations Act, considered against the background of the general law power to rectify a register, would appear to be sufficiently broad to enable a register to be created where the original has been destroyed or cannot be located. Section 175 is plainly a beneficial provision and should be construed broadly. 19 In any event, an order that the register be corrected pursuant to s 175 of the Corporations Act to record the shares presently registered in the name of Mr [NAME] be registered in the name of the Trustee would be sufficient to give the Trustee standing to apply to have [NAME] wound up. That was the position taken by [NAME] in [NAME] v [NAME], where his Honour ordered that the register be corrected nunc pro tunc to record the trustee in bankruptcy as the holder of shares in the relevant company, and also ordered that the company be wound up on the application of the trustee in bankruptcy, who as a result of the correction to the register had standing. In those circumstances, it is unnecessary for the Court to order that a register of members be created for the Trustee to have standing. If necessary, the physical creation (and correction) of the register can in due course be carried out by the [NAME] on behalf of the company. That would appear to be the preferable course to take. 20 In the present circumstances, it is appropriate to make an order pursuant to s 175 of the Corporations Act to correct [NAME]'s register of members to record that the 100 shares presently registered in the name of the [NAME], [NAME], be registered in the name of [NAME] as trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME], such order to take effect nunc pro tunc.

Winding up on just AND equitable grounds 21 For the reasons already given, the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that [NAME] be wound up. The [NAME] director and secretary appears now to reside overseas, and to have no involvement in the management or control of the company. The company appears to be carrying on no business and appears not to have any books and records. The Trustee is now the [NAME] shareholder of [NAME]. The Trustee's application to wind up [NAME] has already been advertised. Mr [NAME] of [NAME] has consented to act as [NAME].

Accordingly, it is appropriate for the Court to order that [NAME] be wound up and Mr [NAME] be appointed as [NAME].

Disposition and orders [ADDRESS] makes the following declarations and orders. [ADDRESS] declares that:

2. Pursuant to s 1072C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), [NAME] as trustee of the [NAME] estate of [NAME] is entitled to be registered as the holder of 100 ordinary shares in [COMPANY]. [ADDRESS] orders that:

4. The applicant's costs of this application be taxed and paid out of the assets of [COMPANY]. I certify that the preceding twenty four (24) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Wigney.

Associate: Dated: 27 August 2015

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The trustee has jurisdiction over shares that have vested due to bankruptcy.
  • A court may extend adjournment periods if it benefits creditors and compliance.
  • An administrator can dispose of company property under the Corporations Act when conditions are met.
  • A creditor retains rights to wind up a debtor company despite an appeal against judgment.
  • A disposition by a bankrupt is void without valuable consideration or good faith from the trustee.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The court dismissed cases where jurisdiction was questioned outside primary areas.
  • An applicant must show significant doubt for Full Court reconsideration.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Court allowed a trustee to become officially recognised as the holder of shares in a company after bankruptcy proceedings, and permitted winding up of the company.

Who was involved?

A trustee acting on behalf of a bankrupt person's estate against a dormant company with no active management.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Court ruled in favour of the trustee based on provisions allowing trustees to be registered as shareholders under bankruptcy law.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 58(1)(b), 121 and Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 175, 461(1)(k), 462(2), 1072C(1), 1072C(2).

What was the argument that mattered most?

The trustee argued they should be registered as a shareholder to wind up the company on just and equitable grounds.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the person who brought the case, the trustee.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar position may seek to become officially recognised as a shareholder and wind up a company on just and equitable grounds.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of bankruptcy proceedings and transfer of shares were key.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions can typically be appealed under certain conditions.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for legal advice in such matters.

Official source: Federal Court of Australia headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Federal Court of Australia and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.