VadeLab
DismissedSocial Security Tribunal of Canada (Employment Insurance)·

Appeal Dismissed for Being Out of Time - Social Security Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Social Security Tribunal dismissed an appeal because it was filed more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to the appellant. The appeal was dismissed based on the time limit set by the Department of Employment and Social Development Act.

⚖️ Legal holding

An appeal must be brought within one year of the reconsideration decision being communicated to the appellant.

Topics

employment insuranceappeals processtime limits

Provisions

Department of Employment and Social Development Act, s. 52(2)

📖 Technical summary

The appeal was dismissed as untimely under the Department of Employment and Social Development Act.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Social Security Tribunal dismissed an appeal as untimely under the Department of Employment and Social Development Act, s. 52(2), which requires appeals to be brought within one year of the reconsideration decision being communicated to the appellant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

Citation: JB  v  Canada Employment Insurance Commission , 2026  SST  65 Tribunal File Number: GE-26-167 BETWEEN: J. B. Appellant and Canada Employment Insurance Commission Respondent SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL

DECISION General Division – Employment Insurance Section

DECISION BY: [NAME] OF

DECISION: January 16, 2026 On this page Overview Analysis Conclusion Reasons and decision Overview [ 1 ] The Appellant applied for employment insurance ( EI ) benefits on June 14, 2024. [ 2 ] In a decision letter dated July 12, 2024, the Canada Employment Insurance Commission (Commission) said the Appellant wasn’t entitled to EI benefits because he lost his job due to his misconduct. [ 3 ] The Appellant submitted a request for reconsideration dated July 19, 2024, that was received by the Commission on July 22, 2024. [ 4 ] On October 2, 2024, the Commission issued its reconsideration decision under section 112 of the Employment Insurance Act (Act). The Appellant appealed that decision to the General Division of the Social Security Tribunal (Tribunal) on January 14, 2026. [ 5 ] Under subsection 52(2) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act ( DESD Act), in no case may an appeal be brought to the General Division of the Tribunal more than one year after the day on which the Commission’s reconsideration decision was communicated to the Appellant. [ 6 ] I must decide whether the appeal was brought in time. Analysis [ 7 ] I find that the Commission’s reconsideration decision was communicated to the Appellant on October 2, 2024. [ 8 ] In a September 27, 2024, phone call record, a Commission officer wrote that she advised the Appellant that the Commission’s initial decision regarding misconduct was maintained on reconsideration. She wrote that she advised him of his right to appeal the reconsideration decision. [ 9 ] The Commission issued a Notice of Decision letter on October 2, 2024, maintaining its initial decision. [ 10 ] In his Notice of Appeal to the Tribunal, The Appellant said that he received the Commission’s reconsideration decision on October 2, 2024. [ 11 ] I find that the Commission’s reconsideration decision was communicated to the Appellant on October 2, 2024. This is the date the Appellant said he received the reconsideration decision. I see no evidence to contradict this. [ 12 ] I find that the Appellant brought the appeal to the General Division of the Tribunal on January 14, 2026. This is the date when he emailed the Notice of Appeal to the Tribunal. [ 13 ] Since the Appellant was made aware of the outcome of the Commission’s reconsideration decision on October 4, 2024, and only filed his Notice of Appeal on January 14, 2026, I find that the appeal was brought more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to him. [ 14 ] The Tribunal must apply subsection 52(2) of the DESD Act, which clearly states that in no case may an appeal be brought more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to the Appellant. [ 15 ] So, the appeal was not brought in time, and the General Division of the Tribunal cannot proceed to hear the Appellant’s appeal. Conclusion [ 16 ] The appeal to the General Division of the Tribunal was not brought in time and therefore will not proceed.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The appeal was dismissed because it was filed more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to the appellant.
  • The Tribunal followed the clear time limit set by subsection 52(2) of the DESD Act.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The appellant claimed he received the reconsideration decision on October 2, 2024, but the appeal was still considered untimely as it was filed on January 14, 2026.
  • The appellant did not bring the appeal within the required one-year period from the date of communication of the reconsideration decision.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The appeal was dismissed as untimely.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the appeal was timely given the one-year limitation period.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the appeal was untimely because it was filed more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to the appellant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Department of Employment and Social Development Act, s. 52(2) was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the appeal was filed more than one year after the reconsideration decision was communicated to the appellant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their appeal is filed within one year of receiving the reconsideration decision.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The dates of communication and filing of the appeal were critical to the decision.

Official source: Social Security Tribunal of Canada (Employment Insurance) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Social Security Tribunal of Canada (Employment Insurance). It is a reproduction of an official work published by the Government of Canada, and the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Government of Canada. It is not an official version.
Appeal Dismissed for Being Out of Time - Social Security | VadeLab