
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In a recent Federal Court decision, an application for mandamus was struck out because the applicant failed to show a legal basis for the requested relief, including the disclosure of financial records and prohibition of withdrawals.
The Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Commissioner can still use section 11 orders to gather information even after starting proceedings before the Tribunal. This decision clarifies the Commissioner's investigative powers and their continuation despite ongoing Tribunal cases.
In a small claims case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for a bicycle and a transit pass. The claimant failed to provide enough evidence to prove the respondent's responsibility for the bicycle's loss and the value of the bicycle.
The claimant asked for a refund of $1,408.40 for horse boarding services, claiming the respondent did not provide the service as agreed. The Tribunal ruled that the respondent did not fundamentally breach the contract, denying the claimant's request for a refund.
The claimant asked for payment for chimney products from the respondent. However, the Tribunal ruled that the claimant did not provide sufficient proof of a valid contract and delivery of the products, dismissing the claim.
In a recent decision, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's interpretation of the term 'high electric field' in a patent infringement case involving French fry production technology. The Court determined that a skilled person in the relevant field would interpret the term as referring to electric fields within a specific voltage range.
The Canada Industrial Relations Board updated a certification order after an employer changed its name. This ensures the bargaining unit accurately reflects the current workforce structure.
The Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board partially allowed a claim alleging arbitrary representation by a bargaining agent in refusing to file a grievance based on race and colour. The Board found the claimant's arguments valid regarding the arbitrary nature of the refusal but dismissed other aspects of the complaint.
An employer tried to get back money they mistakenly paid to a former employee after she quit. The tribunal said the employer was right to ask for the money back, but only for part of it, plus interest and costs.
In a recent Federal Court case, the claimant successfully proved passing off under paragraph 7(b) of the Trademarks Act against multiple respondents over the use of a trademark associated with multicultural events and restaurant promotions. The respondents were ordered to stop using the trademark and were required to pay damages and costs to the claimant.
In a recent Small Claims case, the claimant tried to get compensation from an insurance company after a car accident. The claimant argued the insurance company wrongly assessed his responsibility for the accident. However, the tribunal found the claimant did not provide enough evidence to support his claim and dismissed it.