
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, ruling that the claimant did not meet the eligibility criteria for permanent residence under the Temporary Public Policy. The Court found that the claimant's work experience did not align with the eligible occupation requirements.
The Federal Court rejected a refugee claimant's attempt to challenge the Refugee Appeal Division's decision through judicial review. The Court found that the claimant had not provided sufficient evidence to question the reasonableness of the decision.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, upholding the decision to refuse a temporary resident visa due to insufficient evidence regarding the origin of the funds submitted by the applicant. The court found that the officer was justified in refusing the visa application because the applicant failed to provide adequate supporting documentation to confirm the availability of funds.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for leave and judicial review of a PRRA decision. The court found that the officer's assessment of the applicants having an available internal flight alternative and not requiring a hearing was reasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed applications seeking judicial review of decisions made by a provincial nominee program, ruling that such decisions are not subject to federal court jurisdiction under the Federal Courts Act.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, upholding a decision to deny a study permit due to misrepresentation. The court found that the officer's concerns were substantiated and the applicant was given a fair opportunity to respond.
The Federal Court granted a stay of removal for a family pending the determination of their applications for leave and judicial review. The court found that the family's applications raised serious issues and that the balance of convenience favoured the applicants, especially considering the best interests of the children involved.
The Federal Court allowed a judicial review of a spousal sponsorship application decision, stating that the Immigration Appeal Division's decision was unreasonable because it did not properly consider the factors of a conjugal relationship as outlined in Malodowich v. Penttinen.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review regarding the inadmissibility of a foreign national based on crimes against humanity committed while serving in a military organization. The Court found that the Immigration Division's decision was reasonable and supported by strong evidence.