
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a visa refusal for a citizen of Iran. The court found the visa officer's decision reasonable because the claimant did not provide enough information about her trip to Canada.
The Federal Court dismissed a challenge to an immigration officer's decision regarding the genuineness of a marriage. The officer determined that the marriage was not genuine and was entered into primarily for obtaining permanent residency. The Court upheld the officer's decision, finding it reasonable and procedurally fair.
In a recent Federal Court decision, the court upheld an immigration officer's decision that a marriage was not genuine and was entered primarily for the purpose of obtaining permanent residency in Canada. The court found the officer's decision to be reasonable and made in a fair manner.
The Federal Court decided that an immigration officer's refusal of a humanitarian and compassionate application was unreasonable because the officer did not properly consider the applicant's learning disability and failed to assess all relevant factors comprehensively.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, supporting an officer's decision that a marriage was not genuine and was entered into primarily for the purpose of obtaining permanent residence in Canada. The officer's decision was based on the applicant's own evidence and known relationships, without relying on outside information.
The Federal Court overturned a visa officer's decision to deny a work permit application because the officer's reasons were not clear enough. The court highlighted the importance of providing adequate explanations in administrative decisions.
The Federal Court allowed an application for judicial review, finding that the decision-maker's analysis was unreasonable for failing to consider the totality of the circumstances when evaluating whether an individual had a well-founded fear of persecution or faced a risk under section 97 of the IRPA.