VadeLab

Tax

Tax judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Apr 14, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Appeal Due to Non-Compliance with Specific Requirements

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Apr 14, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Claimant's Bad Debt Deduction Appeal

AllowedTax Court of Canada·Apr 14, 2026

Tax Court Grants Motion to Strike Subparagraphs in Appeal

DismissedFederal Court of Appeal·Apr 10, 2026

Federal Court Rejects Request for Enhanced Costs in Tax Case

In a recent Federal Court of Appeal decision, the Crown requested enhanced costs for a tax case but was denied. The Court ruled that the standard tariff should apply, rejecting the Crown's request for higher costs.

AllowedTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Motion to Quash Appeals Due to Incorrect Address

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Court Denies Motion Due to Mailing Issues

Struck OutTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Court Strikes Appellant's Notice of Appeal Due to Mootness

Struck OutTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Appeal Struck Due to Mootness in Tax Court

In a tax case before the Tax Court of Canada, the judge ruled that certain parts of an appellant's legal documents were struck down because they raised issues that had already been resolved. This means the a person's appeal could not proceed on those points.

Allowed in PartTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Court Allows Appeal on GST/HST Reassessment, Vacates Penalties

In this case, the Tax Court allowed an appeal brought by a taxpayer regarding reassessment of GST/HST beyond the statutory limitation period due to misrepresentations caused by neglect or carelessness. However, penalties for gross negligence were vacated as the court found insufficient evidence of serious misconduct.

AllowedTax Court of Canada·Apr 09, 2026

Tax Court Allows Appeal, Reassessment Beyond Statutory Period

AllowedFederal Court·Apr 02, 2026

Contempt of Court Case: Respondents Fail to Comply With Orders

The Respondents were found guilty of contempt for failing to provide required documents and information to the Minister of National Revenue, as ordered by Justice Thorne. They were fined and warned of potential imprisonment if they did not comply with the order.

DismissedFederal Court·Mar 31, 2026

Federal Court Rejects Challenge to CRA's Nil Assessment Decision

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 27, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Request to Examine Maple Leafs Entity

The Tax Court of Canada dismissed a motion by the respondent seeking permission to examine a representative from a person for discovery purposes. The court ruled that the respondent did not meet the strict requirements set out in Rule 99(2) of the Tax Court Rules (General Procedure).

DismissedFederal Court·Mar 27, 2026

Federal Court Denies Taxpayer Relief Under ITA

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 27, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Motion for Third-Party Discovery in NHL Player's Tax Case

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 25, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Appeals Over Unreported Income Reassessments

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 25, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Appeal on Transfer Pricing Adjustments

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 25, 2026

Taxpayer Loses Appeal Over False Statements on Taxes

The Tax Court dismissed a a person's appeals regarding reassessments for their tax years from 2010 to 2012. The court found that the a person was liable for penalties because they knowingly or through wilful blindness made false statements about business and capital losses in their tax returns.

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 25, 2026

Tax Court Rejects Appeal Over False Statements in Tax Returns

DismissedTax Court of Canada·Mar 25, 2026

Tax Court Upholds Reassessments Using Net Worth Method

In this case, the Tax Court dismissed appeals by a corporation and its shareholder who challenged the Canada Revenue Agency’s reassessments based on net worth analysis of household expenses. The court upheld the reassessments, finding that the taxpayers did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove the Minister's assumptions or offer an alternative method for determining income.

← PreviousPage 7 · 211 judgmentsNext →