Roommate Must Give One Month's Notice Before Leaving - Civil Resolution Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
In a small claims case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled that a roommate must give one month's notice before leaving the rental property. The respondent failed to provide such notice and claimed misrepresentation by the applicant, but the court found that the applicant did not mislead the respondent about the room's size or furnishings.
⚖️ Legal holding
Roommates must give reasonable notice before leaving, typically one month, unless otherwise agreed.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The roommate was required to give a month's notice of her intention to leave.
- The roommate knew the room was too small for a queen bed and other furniture.
- The roommate accepted that the room was partially furnished despite initial ads suggesting otherwise.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The roommate claimed the applicant misrepresented the size of the room through misleading photos.
- The roommate argued she was entitled to terminate the agreement with no notice due to misrepresentation.
- The roommate claimed she was owed a late fee as specified in the lease agreement with the landlord.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision ruled that the roommate must give one month's notice before leaving the rental property.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the roommate owed rent after leaving without giving proper notice.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the roommate breached the agreement by not giving a month's notice, finding that the roommate knew the room was too small for a queen bed and accepted the room was partially furnished.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were cited in the decision.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the roommate knew the room was too small for a queen bed and accepted the room was partially furnished, thus breaching the agreement by not giving proper notice.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, it means that roommates should always provide reasonable notice before leaving, typically one month, to avoid breaching the agreement.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence that mattered included text messages, discussions about the room's size and furnishings, and the roommate's knowledge of the room's condition.