VadeLab
Allowed in PartCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·

Roommates Recover Part of Security Deposits in Small Claims

Case No.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord must return a tenant's security deposit minus any legitimate deductions for unpaid bills and damages.

Topics

roommate disputessecurity depositssmall claims

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 47

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The applicants proved their rooms and common areas were left reasonably clean.
  • The applicants acknowledged responsibility for their share of certain utility bills and minor breakages.
  • The tribunal found the landlord's claim against the security deposit was not extinguished due to lack of condition inspection reports.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The applicants argued the landlord should have completed a condition inspection report at the start of their tenancies.
  • The applicants claimed the landlord could not withhold funds for cleaning because the house was left reasonably clean.
  • The applicants suggested the landlord's invoices for cleaning were insufficient proof of damage.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the landlord was entitled to withhold part of the security deposits for unpaid bills and minor damages, but not the full amount claimed by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 47 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the claimants' argument that the landlord improperly withheld their security deposits without proper justification.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the claimants, who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have clear records of any payments made and any damages incurred to support their case.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents that mattered included the roommate agreements, utility bills, and invoices for cleaning and repairs.

Official source: Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Roommates recover part of security deposits | Small Claims | VadeLab